No abstract available.
Budesonide* ; Humans

The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between acute exacerbation and Forced Expiratory Volume 1 second (FEV1) improvement after treatment with combined long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 137 COPD patients were classified as responders or nonresponders according to FEV1 improvement after 3 months of LABA/ICS treatment in fourteen referral hospitals in Korea. Exacerbation occurrence in these two subgroups was compared over a period of 1 yr. Eighty of the 137 COPD patients (58.4%) were classified as responders and 57 (41.6%) as nonresponders. Acute exacerbations occurred in 25 patients (31.3%) in the responder group and in 26 patients (45.6%) in the nonresponder group (P=0.086). FEV1 improvement after LABA/ICS treatment was a significant prognostic factor for fewer acute exacerbations in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, sex, FEV1, smoking history, 6 min walk distance, body mass index, exacerbation history in the previous year, and dyspnea scale.Three-month treatment response to LABA/ICS might be a prognostic factor for the occurrence of acute exacerbation in COPD patients.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/*therapeutic use ; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/*therapeutic use ; Bronchodilator Agents/*therapeutic use ; Budesonide/therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fluticasone/therapeutic use ; Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects/*physiology ; Formoterol Fumarate/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Recurrence ; Republic of Korea ; Salmeterol Xinafoate/therapeutic use ; Smoking ; Spirometry ; Treatment Outcome

No abstract available.
Beclomethasone* ; Budesonide* ; Hydrocortisone*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect f nebulized budensonide and intramuscular dexamethasone in relieving laryngeal obstruction of croup. METHODS: Forty patients with moderate croup (croup scores of 3 to 7 out of 17) were randomly assigned to budesonide group [1 mg(2 ml) of nebulized budesonide, N=15], dexamethasone group [intramuscular dexamethasone(0.5 mg/kg) and nebulized saline, N=10] and control group(2 ml of nebulized saline, N=15). The changes of croup scores, heart rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2) were observed at post-treatment of 2, 24, 36 and 48 hours. The duration of admission and the rates of improvement to the croup score of < or = 1 at the post-treatments were compared. RESULTS: Croup scores at 12, 24 and 36 hours post treatments were 1.7+/-0.8, 1.1+/-0.7 and 0.8+/-0.7 in budensonide group and 2.2+/-0.7, 1.2+/-0.8 and 1.0+/-0.5 in dexamethasone group respectively, which were significantly lower rate, and SaO2 were not significantly different among the three groups. Improved rates to croup score of <1 in budesonide group at post-treatments of 12, 24, and 36 jpirs were 53%, 73% and 87%, which were significantly higher than 0%, 13%, and 47% in control group (p<0.05). Improved rate to croup score of < or = 1 in dexamethasone group was 60^ which was significantly hgier than 13% in control group only at post-treatment of 24 hours (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Nebulized budesonide and intramusculan dexamethasone are both effective in reducing obstructive symptoms in patients with moderate croup. The effect of nebulized budesonide was more rapid than that of intramuscular dexamethasone.
Budesonide* ; Croup ; Dexamethasone* ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Oxygen ; Respiratory Rate

PURPOSE: Cough-variant asthma (CVA) is a common cause of chronic cough in young children. Some children who have CVA eventually develop classic asthma. We evaluated the effect of inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene receptor antagonist in young children who are suspected of having CVA. METHODS: Thirty-seven cough-variant asthma patients younger than 5-years-old were enrolled in this study. Fifteen were treated with pulmicort nebulization (500 micorgram, bid) for 4 weeks (Group A). Fourteen were treated with leukotriene receptor antagonist (Singulair, 4 mg) for 4 weeks (Group B). Eleven were treated with intermittent short-acting beta2-agonist nebulization (Group C). We evaluated the mean change of symptom score in night cough and sleep disturbance. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, sex, total IgE, total eosinophil count or duration of cough among the three groups. Group A and B showed significant improvement of night cough and sleep disturbance after treatment. (P< 0.05) In Group A and B, night cough was significantly improved after treatment more than in control. (P< 0.05) But improvements in sleep disturbance didn't have any signigicant differences between the three groups. (P= 1.0) CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene receptor antagonist are effective to control chronic cough in CVA children younger than 5-years-old.
Asthma* ; Budesonide ; Child ; Cough ; Eosinophils ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin E ; Receptors, Leukotriene*

The aims of this study are to compare the efficacy and side effects of intranasal budesonide as a dry powder and as a freonpropelled pressurized aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis and to assess the difference in compliance with the powder and aerosol. The study design was a randomized, double-blind crossover between two treatment groups over a six-week period. Twelve patients with symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis received 400 microgram of intranasal budesonide administered daily as two puffs/nostril/day of the drug delivered by a freon-propelled aerosol for the first three weeks and as one inhalation/nostril/day of the pure drug powder for the next three weeks. Fourteen adults with allergic rhinitis received the drug in the reverse sequence. Patients recorded daily symptoms on diaries, and, at each clinic visit, adverse effects were recorded. Compliance with the powder and with the aerosol was also evaluated. During the six weeks, there were significant improvements in symptoms in both treatment groups, and the differences in efficacy and compliance with the medication between the two groups were not significant. Adverse effects included headaches, epistaxis, and nasal dryness ; however, they were not serious and equally distributed in the two groups. We conclude that powder and aerosolized budesonide improve the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis significantly with little difference in efficacy, side effects, and preference.
Adult ; Ambulatory Care ; Budesonide* ; Compliance ; Epistaxis ; Headache ; Humans ; Rhinitis*

The aims of this study are to compare the efficacy and side effects of intranasal budesonide as a dry powder and as a freonpropelled pressurized aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis and to assess the difference in compliance with the powder and aerosol. The study design was a randomized, double-blind crossover between two treatment groups over a six-week period. Twelve patients with symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis received 400 microgram of intranasal budesonide administered daily as two puffs/nostril/day of the drug delivered by a freon-propelled aerosol for the first three weeks and as one inhalation/nostril/day of the pure drug powder for the next three weeks. Fourteen adults with allergic rhinitis received the drug in the reverse sequence. Patients recorded daily symptoms on diaries, and, at each clinic visit, adverse effects were recorded. Compliance with the powder and with the aerosol was also evaluated. During the six weeks, there were significant improvements in symptoms in both treatment groups, and the differences in efficacy and compliance with the medication between the two groups were not significant. Adverse effects included headaches, epistaxis, and nasal dryness ; however, they were not serious and equally distributed in the two groups. We conclude that powder and aerosolized budesonide improve the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis significantly with little difference in efficacy, side effects, and preference.
Adult ; Ambulatory Care ; Budesonide* ; Compliance ; Epistaxis ; Headache ; Humans ; Rhinitis*

PURPOSE: There have been few reports regarding the efficacy of antiasthmatics in older patients. To compare the efficacy of the addition of montelukast to low-dose inhaled budesonide (MON-400BUD) versus increasing the dose of inhaled steroid (800BUD) on asthma control in older asthmatics. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel-designed trial was conducted for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients who reached "well-controlled asthma status" after the 12-week treatment period. Additionally, asthma exacerbations, sputum inflammatory cells, asthma control test (ACT) and physical functioning scale (PFS), and adverse reactions were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-four (36.9%) and 22 (34.9%) subjects in the MON-400BUD (n=65) and 800BUD (n=63) groups had well-controlled asthma at the end of the study, respectively. The numbers of asthma exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroid treatment (20 vs 9, respectively, P=0.036) and the development of sore throat (22 vs 11, respectively, P=0.045) were significantly higher in the 800BUD group than in the MON-400BUD group. Body mass index and changes in ACT, FEV1%, 6-min walk distance and PFS from baseline were all significant determinants for distinguishing subjects with well-controlled and partly controlled asthma from those with uncontrolled asthma (P<0.05) at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 12-week treatment with MON-400BUD in older asthmatics was comparable to that of 800BUD on asthma control but associated with reduced frequency of asthma exacerbations requiring oral steroids and sore throat events. Changes in ACT and PFS can be useful predictors of asthma control status in older patients.
Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; Asthma ; Body Mass Index ; Budesonide ; Humans ; Motor Activity ; Pharyngitis ; Sputum ; Steroids

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common symptomatic primary antibody deficiency syndrome and has a high prevalence of gastrointestinal complications. We report the case of a 36-year-old male with CVID who presented with chronic intractable diarrhea and malabsorption. A comprehensive evaluation revealed no secondary causes of his symptoms. He was treated symptomatically without improvement. After receiving systemic steroid treatment, his symptoms improved, but returned soon after tapering the steroid. When he was subsequently administered oral budesonide, his symptoms and quality of life improved; this effect lasted for 20 months without unacceptable side effects.
Adult ; Budesonide* ; Common Variable Immunodeficiency* ; Diarrhea* ; Humans ; Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes ; Male ; Prevalence ; Quality of Life

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the protective effect of antiasthmatic activity of inhaled heparin, cromolyn sodium, budesonide, furosemide in exercise-induced asthma(EIA). The other important considerable point of this study was the mechanism of bronchoconstriction on EIA. METHOD: Eight subjects with a history of EIA were studied on 5 different experiment days. After obtaining baseline FEV(1) and FVC, subjects performed a standardized exercise challenge. EIA was assessed by measurement of FEV(1) before and after exercise. On experiment day 4, the exercise challengs was performed after the subjects inhaled either heparin (1,000 units/kg/day for 5 days), furosemide (1 mg/kg for 5 days), cromolyn(4 mg/kg for 5 days), or budesonide (400 micrograms/day for 5 days). On experiment day 5, the methacholine brochial provocation test was performed. On experiment day 3, activated partial thromboplastine time(aPTT) was checked. RESULTS: Maximum decrements of FEV(1)(mean+/-SE) among o to 120 minutes after exerise were as follows : heparin was 83.1+/-4.81% (p=0.010), furosemide was 80.5+/-6.87% (p=0.071), cromolyn was 86.8+/-6.53% (p=0.340), and budesonide was 79.4+/-7.31% (p=0.095). Above medications were copmpared to the control value (72.5+/-18.2%) by paired t-test. No medications had effect on PD of methacholine bronchial provocation test. The results were control (1.58+/-0.49 mumol), heparin(4.17+/-1.96 mumol), forosemide (1.85+/-0.86 mumol), cromolyn (2.19+/-0.89 mumol) and budesonide (3.38+/-1.77 mumol), respectively(p>0.05). The inhaled heparin had no effect of anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that inhaled heparin has a protective effect on EIA. The effect of inhaled cromolyn was statisitically absent with manufacture's recommended dosage on EIA. So, the dosage of cromolyn should be carefully evaluated in future. Although inhalation of budesonide and furosemide have no statistical significance compared to control, these drugs also have some protective effects on EIA.
Asthma, Exercise-Induced* ; Bronchial Provocation Tests ; Bronchoconstriction ; Budesonide* ; Cromolyn Sodium* ; Furosemide* ; Heparin* ; Inhalation ; Methacholine Chloride ; Thromboplastin