1.Bronchial Provocation Test.
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2004;57(3):221-225
No abstract available.
Bronchial Provocation Tests*
2.Use of Peak Flow Meter and Bronchial Challenge Test.
Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 2000;10(4):263-267
No abstract available.
Bronchial Provocation Tests*
3.Elk dander-induced occupational asthma.
Sang Woo OH ; Mi Kyeong KIM ; Jae Hong CHOI ; Sang Moo JUNG ; Byung Kyu NAH ; Jih Yun LEE
Korean Journal of Allergy 1997;17(1):78-83
We experienced two cases of occupational asthma induced by Elk dander in Elk-feeders and confirmed these cases by the bronchial provocation test with Elk dander. Both of them showed dual asthmatic response. They also showed positive reaction to the skin prick test with EIK dander. Now one of them has no asthmatic symptoms at all after complete avoidnce of EIK dander.
Asthma, Occupational*
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Dander
;
Skin
4.Comparative Study of Nebulizer Output and Particle Size for Standardization of Inhalation Provocation Test.
Eun Kyoung HWANG ; Hhyun Jung KIM ; Kyae Sung KIM ; Wook JANG ; Man Yong HAN ; Sun Hi MOON
Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 2003;13(1):47-54
PURPOSE: It is very important to compare the particle size and total output from inhalation devices for standardization of bronchial provocation test. METHODS: Total output (mass output, salt output) from 4 nebulizer/compressor combination (LC plus/Pari-boy, Long life/Pari-boy, Pulmoaid/Pulmoaid, DeVilbiss/DeVilbiss) which were charged with 2 mL of 0.9% normal saline was measured. Aerosol particle size was measured directly using laser diffraction by Marvern Master Sizer and by evaluating Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD). RESULTS: The LC plus nebulizer had the highest output rate and delivered the largest particles. The Maximal output rates of the 3 nebulizer/compressor combination was half that LC plus /Pari-boy combination. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that it might be different in mass output and particle size by inhalation devices. These differences can influence to the results of bronchial provocation test such as FEV1. We emphasizes that it is necessary to standardize the total output and particle size from each inhalation devices to perform and interpretate the results of bronchial provocation test.
Bronchial Provocation Tests*
;
Inhalation*
;
Nebulizers and Vaporizers*
;
Particle Size*
5.Relationship between bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the peripheral obstruction in stable asthmatic children.
Ju YIN ; Kun-ling SHEN ; Shi-ying LIU ; Li XIANG ; Qi ZHANG ; Zhen LI
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2004;42(2):87-89
OBJECTIVEAsthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease of children. The association between asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) has been well-demonstrated. The objective of the study was to investigate relationship between the bronchial responsiveness and the peripheral obstruction in stable asthmatic children.
METHODSThirty-nine children with stable asthma, 28 boys and 11 girls with a mean age of 128 (77 - 197) months, received the bronchial provocation test by the maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curve measurement. The children were divided into two groups: one with maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) < 80% (n = 15) and the other with MMEF >/= 80% (n = 24). Positive rates of bronchial provocation test were compared between groups of MMEF < 80% and >/= 80% and between the children whose relief duration was = 12 months (n = 26) and > 12 months (n = 13). Statistical analysis was performed by using Chi-square, rank sum test or t test (SPSS10.0), P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTSIn the 39 stable asthmatic children, 15 (38%) were detected MMEF < 80% and 28 (72%) had BHR. There was no significant difference in BHR between the children with MMEF < 80% and those with MMEF >/= 80% (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in BHR between the children whose relief duration was = 12 months and > 12 months (P > 0.05), either.
CONCLUSIONSThe stable asthmatic children still had peripheral obstruction and BHR, which indicated the presence of airway inflammation. There was no significant difference in BHR between the children whose relief duration was = 12 months and > 12 months.
Asthma ; physiopathology ; Bronchial Hyperreactivity ; physiopathology ; Bronchial Provocation Tests ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate
6.The Relation between Early Allergic Response and Nasobronchial Relationship and the Associated Factors of Bronchial Hyperreactivity in Allergic Rhinitis Patients.
Myung Keun CHANG ; Sung Wan KIM ; Joong Saeng CHO ; Chang Il CHA
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2006;49(8):795-801
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are evidences that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuity of disease. It is known that bronchial hyperreactivity is a most contributing factor for asthma, yet it remains controversial whether there is a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the upper and lower airway. This study was performed to evaluate a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the two diseases by using early allergic responses and to define the clinical factors for predicting bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic rhinitis patients. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Seventy three patients with allergic rhinitis and 36 patients without allergic rhinitis were included in this study, where exclusion criteria were diagnosed asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, nasal polyp and chronic paranasal sinusitis. Nasal provocation tests with allergen were applied to 29 allergic rhinitis patients. After 30 minutes, we investigated lower airway using symptom scores, bronchial provocation test with methacholine and pulmonary function test. Bronchial provocation test with methacholine was applied to 44 allergic rhinitis patients and 36 non-allergic rhinitis patient. We checked nasal symptom scores and the change of nasal volume by VAS and acoustic rhinometry, respectively. We also investigated the incidence and the predictive factors of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic rhinitis patients. RESULTS: The early allergic response provocated at nasal cavity had little effect on bronchus. Bronchial stimuli with methacholine did not affect nasal cavity. The incidence of bronchial hyperreactivity is significantly higher in allergic rhinitis patients than in non-allergic rhinitis patients. Type of allergic rhinitis (especially persistent, moderate-severe group) and the disease-durations are valuable predictive factors of the bronchial hyperreactivity. CONCLUSION: Although early allergic response has little effect on the nasobronchial relationship, there may be a significant correlation between allergic rhinitis and bronchial hyperreactivity. The correlation is more significant in the persistent, moderate-severe group of allergic rhinitis with long disease duration.
Asthma
;
Bronchi
;
Bronchial Hyperreactivity*
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Lung Diseases, Obstructive
;
Methacholine Chloride
;
Nasal Cavity
;
Nasal Polyps
;
Nasal Provocation Tests
;
Respiratory Function Tests
;
Rhinitis*
;
Rhinometry, Acoustic
;
Sinusitis
7.Shell-Grinder's Asthma.
Won Ho KIM ; Soo Kon LEE ; Hyean Chul LEE ; Chein Soo HONG ; Kap Bum HUH ; Won Young LEE ; Sang Yong LEE
Yonsei Medical Journal 1982;23(2):123-130
We surveyed 26 employees of a shell-handling factory on whom skin tests with 12 common allergens and shell powder extract were done. Specific bronchial Provocation tests with shell powder extract were performed on the subjects who had respiratory symptoms. Positive skin responders to shell powder extract were 8 among the 26 subjects (30.8%), and subjects who were positive responders to any one of 12 common allergens showed a higher positive rate than negative responders. Among the 8 subjects who had a positive skin response, four had respiratory symptoms. Three subjects were positive bronchial responders to bronchial provocation tests.
Adult
;
Asthma/epidemiology*
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Human
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Occupational Diseases/epidemiology*
;
Shellfish*
;
Skin Tests
8.Bronchial challenge responses in asthmatic patients sensitized to Artemisia spp. pollen.
Hae Sim PARK ; Mi Kyung LEE ; Chein Soo HONG
Yonsei Medical Journal 1989;30(2):173-179
To characterize the patients whose asthma may be caused by Artemisia pollen extracts, we studied the bronchoprovocation test with Korean Artemisia pollen extracts (1:20 w/v), methacholine bronchial challenge test and wormwood-RAST in 32 asthmatic patients sensitized to Artemisia pollen. Twenty-six(81%) developed a 15% or greater decrease in FEVI after the inhalation of Artemisia pollen extracts and 13 patients showed early responses, 8 dual, and 5 late only. Thirteen(50%) out of 26 positive responders complained of seasonal aggravation of their asthmatic symptoms. Seven(53.8%) of the 13 seasonal type patients, 10(76.9%) of the 13 perennial type and 5(100%) of the 5 negative responders showed concurrent positive responses in the house dust bronchoprovocation test. The bronchial responsiveness to allergen(PD15) was more dependent upon the specific IgE level(bound radioactivity on wormwood-RAST) and multiple regression analysis revealed that the specific IgE level and methacholine PC20 may be contributory to allergen PD15. These results suggested that specific IgE to Artemisia pollen appears to be the major contributor to susceptibility to Artemisia bronchial challenges and this pollen may be considered as one of the important allergenic etiologies of atopic asthma in this country.
Allergens
;
Asthma/diagnosis/*etiology
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Human
;
*Pollen
;
Radioallergosorbent Test
;
Skin Tests
10.The Lung Function Impairment in Non-Atopic Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Its Correlation Analysis.
Linghao ZHANG ; Lu ZHANG ; Chun Hong ZHANG ; Xiao Bi FANG ; Zhen Xiao HUANG ; Qing Yuan SHI ; Li Ping WU ; Peng WU ; Zhen Zhen WANG ; Zhi Su LIAO
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2016;9(4):339-345
OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common disease in otorhinolaryngology and will lead to lower airway abnormality. However, the only lung function in CRS patients and associated factors have not been much studied. METHODS: One hundred patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP group), 40 patients with CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP group), and 100 patients without CRS were enrolled. The difference in lung function was compared. Meanwhile, CRSwNP and CRSsNP group were required to undergo a bronchial provocation or dilation test. Additionally, subjective and objective outcomes were measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20), Lund-Mackay score, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score. The correlation and regression methods were used to analyze the relationship between their lung function and the above parameters. RESULTS: The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75) of CRSwNP group were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.05). On peak expiratory flow, there was no difference between three groups. In CRSwNP group, FEV1 was negatively correlated with peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) and duration of disease (r=–0.348, P=0.013 and r=–0.344, P=0.014, respectively), FEF25-75 negatively with VAS, SNOT-20 (r=–0.490, P=0.028 and r=–0.478, P=0.033, respectively) in CRSsNP group. The incidence of positive bronchial provocation and dilation test was lower in CRSwNP group (10% and 0%, respectively), with both 0% in CRSsNP group. The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that change ratio of FEV1 before and after bronchial provocation or dilation test were correlated with PBEC in CRSwNP group (β=0.403, P=0.006). CONCLUSION: CRS leading to impaired maximum ventilation and small airway is associated with the existence of nasal polyp. Lung function impairments can be reflected by PBEC, duration, VAS, and SNOT-20. In CRSwNP patients, PBEC is independent predictor of FEV₁ change ratio.
Bronchial Hyperreactivity
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Eosinophils
;
Forced Expiratory Volume
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Linear Models
;
Lung*
;
Nasal Polyps
;
Otolaryngology
;
Ventilation
;
Vital Capacity