OBJECTIVES: Deficit schizophrenia (DS) constitutes a disease separate from non-deficit schizophrenia (NDS). The aim of the current study was to compare the quantitative EEG and low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) imaging between DS and NDS. METHODS: This study was performed by 32 channels EEG for 42 schizophrenia patients who we categorized into DS and NDS using proxy instrument deficit syndrome (PDS). We performed the absolute power spectral analyses for delta, theta, alpha, low beta and high beta activities. We compared power spectrum between two groups using Independent t-test. Partial correlation test was performed with clinical parameters. Standardized LORETA (sLORETA) was used for comparison of cortical activity, and statistical nonparametric mapping (SnPM) was applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: DS showed significantly increased delta and theta absolute power in fontal and parietal region compared with NDS (p<0.05). Power spectrum showed significant correlation with 'anergia' and 'hostility/suspiciousness' subscale of brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS)(p<0.05). sLORETA found out the source region (anterior cingulate cortex/limbic part) that delta activity was significantly increased in DS (p=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: DS showed different cortical activity compared with NDS. Our results may suggest QEEG and LORETA could be the marker in differentiating between DS and NDS.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Electroencephalography ; Humans ; Magnets ; Naphthalenesulfonates ; Proxy ; Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) has recently been developed to improve measurement of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. We performed a multi-center study to validate the Korean version of the CAINS (CAINS-K) and explore potential cultural variation. METHODS: One hundred eighty schizophrenia patients diverse in demographic and illness profile were recruited from four centers in Korea. Along with the CAINS-K, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), a self-report measure of behavioral inhibition and activation (BIS/BAS) and neurocognitive tasks were administered to verify external validities. RESULTS: The CAINS-K showed high internal-consistency (0.92) and inter-rater reliability (0.77). Exploratory Factor Analysis replicated a two-factor structure of the original scale including motivation/pleasure and expression deficits dimensions. Korean patients tended to report lower pleasure compared to American patients in the prior study. The CAINS-K showed an adequate convergent validity with the SANS, negative symptoms of the BPRS, and BAS. A divergent validity was supported as the CAINS-K showed zero or only weak correlations with other symptoms of the BPRS, depression from the CDSS, and neurocognitive tasks. CONCLUSION: The CAINS-K demonstrated high internal consistency and adequate external validities, and is expected to promote studies on negative symptoms in Korean patients with schizophrenia.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Depression ; Humans ; Korea ; Pleasure ; Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychopathological features such as depression and anxiety in schizophrenics with obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) as well as the severity of OCS according to duration of schizophrenia. METHODS: We randomly selected sixty four inpatients with schizophrenia. We classified the patients into two groups (OCS group, non-OCS group) according to the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Clinical and demographic features were evaluated. To assess OCS, Y-BOCS were performed. The Korean version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(K-PANSS), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Korean version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (K-CDSS), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) were conducted. Independent t-test and chi-square test were conducted to compare the two groups. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the duration of schizophrenia and the Y-BOCS score. RESULTS: The Y-BOCS, K-CDSS, and BAI scores were higher in the OCS group. There was a significant correlation between the duration of schizophrenia and the Y-BOCS score. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression symptoms were severe in the OCS group. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the longer duration of schizophrenia, the more severe the OCS. Therefore, the evaluation of OCS in schizophrenics should be accompanied by treatment intervention.
Anxiety ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Depression ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Schizophrenia*

OBJECTIVETo assess the efficacy of family intervention in management of schizophrenic patients in China.

METHODSChinese databases CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, CBM and English databases OVID Medline, Science Direct, Web of science, EBSCO were searched systematically from inception to January 2015. Quantitative and empirical studies on the outcomes of social disability screening scale (SDSS), brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) and positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) of family intervention for Chinese schizophrenic patients were selected. The effect size was derived from the standardized mean difference (SMD), and meta-analysis was conducted to compare effects of family intervention by intervention types, time of intervention, durations of illness and severity of schizophrenia.

RESULTSThe study included 57 articles that met inclusion criteria. SDSS and PANSS scores revealed that the effect was positively associated with the length of intervention time (P<0.0001, P=0.0025); the effect of single family intervention was better than that of combined single and multiple family intervention (P<0.0001, P=0.0131); the effect was better for patients with severe conditions than those with less severe conditions (P<0.0001, P=0.0280). The SDSS showed that the effect was better for patients with shorter disease duration (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that the long single family intervention would benefit to schizophrenic patients, particularly for severe patients with short disease duration.

OBJECTIVE: Weight gain is a commonly encountered problem associated with atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine. To investigate the weight reducing effect of amantadine, we conducted an prospective open label study. METHODS: We started amantadine treatment in outpatients who had gained weight during olanzapine treatment (mean dose of 11.94 mg/day, mean weight gain of 6.33 kg). Data were collected at St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea. The add-on treatment of amantadine was given at a mean dose of 161.9 mg/day with mean duration of administration for 110.2 day. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Extrapyramidal Symptom Scale were checked to evaluate the tolerability of amantadine. RESULTS: Before administration of amantadine, the mean dose of olanzapine was 11.94+/-4.58 mg and mean duration of administration was 123.1+/-174.6 days. Body weight and BMI during this period was significantly increased mean 6.33+/-4.45 kg (Z=-3.839, p<0.001), 4.94+/-0.75 (Z=-3.724, p<0.001) respectively. Amantadine was administered mean dose of 161.90+/-58.96 mg for mean 110.2+/-78.7 days. Body weight and BMI was decreased mean 0.96+/-3.44 kg, 0.71+/-2.7, respectively. There was no deterioration in psychiatric symptoms, as shown in BPRS score decrement and no adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: The present data suggests that amantadine does not significantly decrease weight gain experienced by some patients during olanzapine treatment and does not worse psychotic symptoms. Randomized placebo-controlled trial should be needed to confirm these findings.
Amantadine* ; Antipsychotic Agents ; Body Weight ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Humans ; Korea ; Outpatients ; Prospective Studies ; Weight Gain*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between serotonin-related gene polymorphisms and bipolar disorder in the Korean population. In addition, we sought to explore the relationship between the clinical characteristics of bipolar patients and serotonin-related gene polymorphisms. METHODS: Inpatients with bipolar disorder (n=103) and control subjects (n=86) were genotyped for 5HT2A 1438A/G, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) 218 A/C, and TPH2 703G/T. We divided patients with bipolar disorder into two groups according to the presence of psychotic symptoms. The severity of their symptoms was measured using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the genotype distributions or allelic frequencies in the three serotonergic polymorphisms between patients with bipolar disorder and normal controls. There were significant differences in genotype distributions and allele frequencies of the 5-HT2A -1438A/G polymorphism between the psychotic mania group and the non-psychotic mania group (genotype: chi-square=7.50, p=0.024; allele: chi-square=5.92, p=0.015). However, after Bonferroni correction this signifact difference disappeared. We did not find significant differences in the genotype distributions or allelic frequencies in the TPH1 218 A/C and TPH2 703G/T polymorphisms between the psychotic mania group and non-psychotic mania group. CONCLUSION: We failed to found the statistically significant association between three polymorphisms and bipolar disorder. However, there was a trend towards association between 5-HT2A -1438A/G polymorphism and psychotic symptom in bipolar disorder. Future research should seek to clarify this association.
Bipolar Disorder ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Gene Frequency ; Genotype ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Serotonin ; Tryptophan Hydroxylase

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the psychotic depression assessment scale (PDAS), which includes the six-item melancholia subscale from the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD-6) and the five-item psychosis subscale from the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS-5). Data from the Clinical Research Center for Depression (CRESCEND) study, which is a 52-week naturalistic trial, were analyzed. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with psychotic depression from the CRESCEND study met our inclusion criteria. The patients underwent the following psychometric assessments: the PDAS, including HAMD-6 and BPRS-5, the clinical global impression scales, the HAMD, the positive symptom subscale, and the negative symptom subscale. Assessments were performed at the baseline and then at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52. Spearman correlation analyses were used to assess the clinical validity and responsiveness of the PDAS. RESULTS: The clinical validity and responsiveness of the PDAS, including HAMD-6 and BPRS-5, were acceptable, with the exception of the clinical responsiveness of the PDAS for positive symptoms and the clinical responsiveness of BPRS-5 for negative symptoms. CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of the PDAS has been confirmed and this clinical validation will enhance its clinical utility and availability.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Depression* ; Depressive Disorder ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Psychotic Disorders ; Weights and Measures

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy, tolerability and safety of quetiapine in schizophrenia patients diagnosed by the diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual 4th edition was studied in psychiatric department of 4 hospital in Korea. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (male 31, female 33;age 34.2+/-10.4 years; illness duration 8.1+/-8.3 years) who showed acute exacerbation, partial response, or intolerable adverse event to previous antipsychotic drugs were recruited. Doses of quetiapine were adjusted to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability and safety were assessed by reports of adverse events, clinically significant abnormal laboratory values and changes from the baseline to week 8 in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and Simpson-Angus total score as index of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). RESULTS: Fiftythree patients completed the 8 weeks trial. The clinical symptoms indexed by BPRS were significantly improved (baseline score=37.9+/-13.0, score at the end=24.3+/-13.6;F=41.5, d.f.=2.4, p=0.000). The CGI score of severity of illness was also significantly reduced (baseline score=4.7+/-1.1, score at the end= 3.6+/-1.2;F=27.6, d.f.=2.2, p=0.000). The frequencies of the worsening of AIMS and Simpson-Angus scores at the end of study were 7.5% and 4.2%, respectively. The most common adverse events of at least moderate intensity were EPS (9.3%), constipation (6.3%), and sedation (4.7%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that quetiapine is effective, may have a favorable EPS, and has overall safe tolerability in the patients with schizophrenia, and schizophreniform disorder.
Antipsychotic Agents ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Constipation ; Dyskinesias ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Psychotic Disorders ; Schizophrenia* ; Quetiapine Fumarate

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy, tolerability and safety of quetiapine in schizophrenia patients diagnosed by the diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual 4th edition was studied in psychiatric department of 4 hospital in Korea. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (male 31, female 33;age 34.2+/-10.4 years; illness duration 8.1+/-8.3 years) who showed acute exacerbation, partial response, or intolerable adverse event to previous antipsychotic drugs were recruited. Doses of quetiapine were adjusted to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse events. Efficacy was assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability and safety were assessed by reports of adverse events, clinically significant abnormal laboratory values and changes from the baseline to week 8 in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and Simpson-Angus total score as index of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). RESULTS: Fiftythree patients completed the 8 weeks trial. The clinical symptoms indexed by BPRS were significantly improved (baseline score=37.9+/-13.0, score at the end=24.3+/-13.6;F=41.5, d.f.=2.4, p=0.000). The CGI score of severity of illness was also significantly reduced (baseline score=4.7+/-1.1, score at the end= 3.6+/-1.2;F=27.6, d.f.=2.2, p=0.000). The frequencies of the worsening of AIMS and Simpson-Angus scores at the end of study were 7.5% and 4.2%, respectively. The most common adverse events of at least moderate intensity were EPS (9.3%), constipation (6.3%), and sedation (4.7%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that quetiapine is effective, may have a favorable EPS, and has overall safe tolerability in the patients with schizophrenia, and schizophreniform disorder.
Antipsychotic Agents ; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Constipation ; Dyskinesias ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Psychotic Disorders ; Schizophrenia* ; Quetiapine Fumarate

The assessment of patient status in palliative medicine is essential for determining treatments and for clinical outcomes. The objective of assessment tools is to raise the quality of care for individual patients and their families. There are a number of tools available to assess pain, non-pain symptoms and quality of life. The tools are either uni-dimensional or multi-dimensional measures. Unfortunately, however, no single tool is recommended to be a superior to others in symptoms or quality of life assessment. Therefore, to select an appropriate assessment tool, one should consider the time frame and unique characteristics of tools depending on purpose and setting. The combination of prognostic index is highly recommended in prognostication, and web-based prognostic tools are available. Recently, a new objective prognostic score has been constructed through multicenter study in Korea. It does not include clinicalestimates of survival, but includes new objective prognostic factors, therefore, anyone can easily use it. For beginners in palliative medicine, relatively easy-to-use tools would be convenient. We recommend Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status to assess functional status, numeric rating scale for pain assessment and the Korean version of brief pain inventory for initial pain assessment. Asking directly with numeric rating scale or the Korean version of MD Anderson Symptom Inventory would be desirable to assess various symptoms together. We think that European Organization Research and Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care is good to assess the quality of life, while Objective Prognostic Score is convenient as prognostic index for beginners.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ; Humans ; Korea ; Pain Measurement ; Palliative Care ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires