Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is the most common cause of liver disease, and its burden on health systems worldwide continues to rise at an alarming rate. MASLD is a complex disease in which the interactions between susceptible genes and the environment influence the disease phenotype and severity. Advances in human genetics over the past few decades have provided new opportunities to improve our understanding of the multiple pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MASLD. Notably, the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7 and HSD17B13 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be robustly associated with MASLD development and disease progression. These genetic variants play crucial roles in lipid droplet remodeling, secretion of hepatic very low-density lipoprotein and lipogenesis, and understanding the biology has brought new insights to this field. This review discusses the current body of knowledge regarding these genetic drivers and how they can lead to development of MASLD, the complex interplay with metabolic factors such as obesity, and how this information has translated clinically into the development of risk prediction models and possible treatment targets.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is the most common cause of liver disease, and its burden on health systems worldwide continues to rise at an alarming rate. MASLD is a complex disease in which the interactions between susceptible genes and the environment influence the disease phenotype and severity. Advances in human genetics over the past few decades have provided new opportunities to improve our understanding of the multiple pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MASLD. Notably, the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7 and HSD17B13 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be robustly associated with MASLD development and disease progression. These genetic variants play crucial roles in lipid droplet remodeling, secretion of hepatic very low-density lipoprotein and lipogenesis, and understanding the biology has brought new insights to this field. This review discusses the current body of knowledge regarding these genetic drivers and how they can lead to development of MASLD, the complex interplay with metabolic factors such as obesity, and how this information has translated clinically into the development of risk prediction models and possible treatment targets.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is the most common cause of liver disease, and its burden on health systems worldwide continues to rise at an alarming rate. MASLD is a complex disease in which the interactions between susceptible genes and the environment influence the disease phenotype and severity. Advances in human genetics over the past few decades have provided new opportunities to improve our understanding of the multiple pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MASLD. Notably, the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7 and HSD17B13 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be robustly associated with MASLD development and disease progression. These genetic variants play crucial roles in lipid droplet remodeling, secretion of hepatic very low-density lipoprotein and lipogenesis, and understanding the biology has brought new insights to this field. This review discusses the current body of knowledge regarding these genetic drivers and how they can lead to development of MASLD, the complex interplay with metabolic factors such as obesity, and how this information has translated clinically into the development of risk prediction models and possible treatment targets.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is the most common cause of liver disease, and its burden on health systems worldwide continues to rise at an alarming rate. MASLD is a complex disease in which the interactions between susceptible genes and the environment influence the disease phenotype and severity. Advances in human genetics over the past few decades have provided new opportunities to improve our understanding of the multiple pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MASLD. Notably, the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7 and HSD17B13 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been demonstrated to be robustly associated with MASLD development and disease progression. These genetic variants play crucial roles in lipid droplet remodeling, secretion of hepatic very low-density lipoprotein and lipogenesis, and understanding the biology has brought new insights to this field. This review discusses the current body of knowledge regarding these genetic drivers and how they can lead to development of MASLD, the complex interplay with metabolic factors such as obesity, and how this information has translated clinically into the development of risk prediction models and possible treatment targets.

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing rapidly with the obesity and diabetes mellitus epidemics. It is rapidly becoming the most common cause of liver disease worldwide. NAFLD can progress to serious complications such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Therefore, it is important to recognise this condition so that early intervention can be implemented. Lifestyle modifications and strict control of metabolic risk factors are the mainstay of treatment. As disease progression is slow in the majority of NAFLD patients, most can be managed well by primary care physicians. NAFLD patients with advanced liver fibrosis should be referred to specialist care for further assessment.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; pathology ; Diet ; Disease Progression ; Humans ; Life Style ; Liver ; pathology ; Liver Cirrhosis ; pathology ; Liver Neoplasms ; pathology ; Metabolic Syndrome ; complications ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Obesity ; complications ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology* ; Humans ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology* ; Risk Factors

Background/Aims: Non-alcoholic liver disease and alcoholic liver disease begin as simple steatosis that may progress to steatohepatitis and ensuing liver-related complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored differences in characteristics between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and alcoholic steatohepatitisrelated (ASH) HCC. Methods: NASH and ASH patients were identified from our department’s prospective HCC database. A total of 54 and 45 patients met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for the NASH-HCC and ASH-HCC groups, respectively. Clinical, biochemical and tumor characteristics were studied. Results: NASH-HCC patients were older compared to ASH-HCC patients (72±9 vs. 66±9 years, P<0.001) and less male predominant (65% vs. 98%, P<0.001). Prevalence of diabetes mellitus (78% vs. 36%, P<0.001) and hypertension (80% vs. 58%, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the NASH-HCC group. Liver function tests and Child-Pugh scores were similar. There were no differences in alpha-fetoprotein level, lesions found at diagnosis (unifocal/multifocal) or prevalence of portal vein invasion. In both groups, almost half of the patients were in TNM stage 4 at the time of diagnosis and more than 50% of patients were not suitable for any therapy. Median survival in the NASH-HCC and ASH-HCC groups were 13 and 7 months respectively (P=0.113). Conclusions Despite significant differences in demography of the NASH-HCC and ASH-HCC groups, liver and tumor characteristics were comparable. Most patients were diagnosed late and were not amenable to curative or locoregional therapies. Better characterization of patients with NASH and ASH at risk of HCC is necessary to optimize screening, surveillance, and management strategies.

INTRODUCTION: The cost-effectiveness of screening asymptomatic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients remains debatable, with current studies assuming lifelong benefits of NAFLD screening while neglecting cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, and to establish a price threshold for NAFLD treatment, when it becomes available. METHOD: A Markov model was constructed comparing 4 screening strategies (versus no screening) to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis among T2DM patients: fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), FIB-4 and VCTE (simultaneous), and FIB-4 and VCTE (sequential). Sensitivity analyses and price threshold analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainties in the results. RESULTS: VCTE was the most cost-effective NAFLD screening strategy (USD24,727/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), followed by FIB-4 (USD36,800/QALY), when compared to no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a higher degree of certainty for VCTE as a cost-effective strategy compared to FIB-4 (90.7% versus 73.2%). The duration of expected screening benefit is the most influential variable based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio tornado analysis. The minimum duration of screening benefit for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective was at least 2.6 years. The annual cost of NAFLD treatment should be less than USD751 for NAFLD screening to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION Both VCTE and FIB-4 are cost-effective NAFLD screening strategies among T2DM patients in Singapore. However, given the lack of access to VCTE at primacy care and potential budget constraints, FIB-4 can also be considered for NAFLD screening among T2DM patients in Singapore.
Humans ; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis* ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis* ; Research ; Fibrosis

Cost of Illness ; Financial Stress ; Hepatitis B, Chronic ; Humans ; Perception ; Self Report