In order to develop an anti-human TNF-alpha mAb, mice were immunized with recombinant human TNF-alpha. A murine mAb, TSK114, which showed the highest binding activity for human TNF-alpha was selected and characterized. TSK114 specifically bound to human TNF-alpha without cross-reactivity with the homologous murine TNF-alpha and human TNF-beta TSK114 was found to be of IgG1 isotype with kappa light chain. The nucleotide sequences of the variable regions of TSK114 heavy and light chains were determined and analyzed for the usage of gene families for the variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) segments. Kinetic analysis of TSK114 binding to human TNF-alpha by surface plasmon resonance technique revealed a binding affinity (KD) of ~5.3 pM, which is about 1,000- and 100-fold higher than those of clinically relevant infliximab (Remicade) and adalimumab (Humira) mAbs, respectively. TSK114 neutralized human TNF-alpha-mediated cytotoxicity in proportion to the concentration, exhibiting about 4-fold greater efficiency than those of infliximab and adalimumab in WEHI 164 cells used as an in vitro model system. These results suggest that TSK114 has the potential to be developed into a therapeutic TNF-alpha-neutralizing antibody with picomolar affinity.
Amino Acid Sequence ; Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/chemistry/genetics/*immunology ; Antibody Affinity/*immunology ; Antibody Specificity ; Base Sequence ; Blotting, Western ; Cell Line ; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin Variable Region/genetics ; Kinetics ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Neutralization Tests ; Sequence Analysis, Protein ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/*immunology

Background/Aims: Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors and effectively control nocturnal acid breakthrough. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan versus dexlansoprazole regarding nocturnal acid breakthrough in healthy subjects. Methods: In a randomized, open-label, single-dose, balanced incomplete block crossover study, 24 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive oral tegoprazan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or dexlansoprazole (60 mg) during each of two administration periods, separated by a 7- to 10-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic parameter analysis; gastric monitoring was performed for pharmacodynamic parameter evaluation. Results: All 24 subjects completed the study. Average maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve, and mean time with gastric pH >4 and pH >6 for tegoprazan demonstrated dose-dependent incremental increases. All the tegoprazan groups reached mean pH ≥4 within 2 hours, whereas the dexlansoprazole group required 7 hours after drug administration. Based on pharmacodynamic parameters up to 12 hours after evening dosing, 50, 100, and 200 mg of tegoprazan presented a stronger acid-suppressive effect than 60 mg of dexlansoprazole. Moreover, the dexlansoprazole group presented a comparable acid-suppressive effect with the tegoprazan groups 12 hours after dosing. Conclusions All the tegoprazan groups demonstrated a significantly faster onset of gastric pH increase and longer holding times above pH >4 and pH >6 up to 12 hours after evening dosing than the dexlansoprazole group.

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that treats gastric acid-related diseases. Clarithromycin was widely used as one of various regimens for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of tegoprazan and clarithromycin between combination therapy and monotherapy to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction. An open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. According to the assigned sequence, the subject was administered the assigned treatment during 5 days in each period. PK parameters of tegoprazan and clarithromycin administered in combination were compared with those of the respective monotherapies. The co-administration of tegoprazan with clarithromycin increased maximum steady-state plasma concentration (C ss,max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in dosing interval at steady-state (AUC ss,tau ) of tegoprazan (1.6-fold in C ss,max and 2.5-fold in AUC ss,tau ) and M1 (2.0-fold in C ss,max , 2.5-fold in AUC ss,tau ) than tegoprazan alone. The C ss,max and AUC sss,tau of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin increased 1.8- and 2.0-fold in co-administration, respectively. The AUC ss.tau of clarithromycin was slightly increased in co-administration, but C ss,max was not changed. Combination of tegoprazan and clarithromycin and those of the respective monotherapies were tolerated in 24 healthy subjects. There may exist drug interaction that lead to reciprocal increase in plasma drug concentrations when tegoprazan and clarithromycin were administrated in combination and no safety concerns were raised. It is suggested that an in-depth analysis of the concentrationresponse relationship is necessary to determine whether these concentration changes warrant clinical action.