1.Clinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales
Heekang CHOI ; Daewon KIM ; Mijung KWON ; Jung-Hyun BYUN ; Bonghwan JIN ; Ki-Ho HONG ; Hyukmin LEE ; Dongeun YONG
Annals of Clinical Microbiology 2022;25(4):115-125
Background:
Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for the appropriate treatment of bloodstream infections. The QMAC-dRAST system (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) can directly perform RAST using positive blood culture samples with microscopic imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QMAC-dRAST system for AmpCβ-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
Methods:
Eighty isolates (20 Morganella morganii, 20 Serratia marcescens, 10 Klebsiella aerogenes, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, and 20 Citrobacter freundii) and 14 antimicrobial agents were included in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The performance of the QMAC-dRAST system was evaluated by simulating the clinical blood culturing process. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems (bioMérieux Inc., France). Broth microdilution tests were performed as the reference method to resolve any discrepancies in the AST results between the two systems.
Results:
For 20 M. morganii and 20 S. marcescens, the categorical agreement (CA) between the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems increased from 55.4% to 83.8% after AST algorithm optimization. Moreover, the discrepancy rates decreased as follows: from 19.1% to 5.4% very major errors (VME), from 38.3% to 4.3% major errors (ME), and from 14.6% to 12.1% minor errors (mE) for the QMAC-dRAST system compared to the Vitek 2 system. For all 80 tested isolates, the QMAC-dRAST system showed 93.0% CA, 1.7% VME, 2.3% ME, and 4.9% mE.
Conclusion
The QMAC-dRAST system was comparable to the Vitek 2 system after AST algorithm optimization for AmpC β-lactamase-producers, which are major pathogens and require time to express the enzyme. However, further modifications of the AST algorithm are still warranted.
2.Correction: Clinical Evaluation of QMAC-dRAST for Direct and Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test with Gram-Positive Cocci from Positive Blood Culture Bottles.
Hyunjung KIM ; Hyun Yong JEONG ; Sangkwon HAN ; Shinhun HAN ; Jungil CHOI ; Bonghwan JIN ; Taegeun LIM ; Eun Geun KIM ; Dong Young KIM ; Sang Hoon SONG ; Taek Soo KIM ; Sunghoon KWON
Annals of Clinical Microbiology 2018;21(2):45-45
There was an error in the article, the names of manufacturers and countries of equipments in the Korean abstract were reversed.
3.Clinical Evaluation of QMAC-dRAST for Direct and Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test with Gram-Positive Cocci from Positive Blood Culture Bottles.
Hyunjung KIM ; Hyun Yong JEONG ; Sangkwon HAN ; Shinhun HAN ; Jungil CHOI ; Bonghwan JIN ; Taegeun LIM ; Eun Geun KIM ; Dong Young KIM ; Sang Hoon SONG ; Taek Soo KIM ; Sunghoon KWON
Annals of Clinical Microbiology 2018;21(1):12-19
BACKGROUND: Timely intervention in the treatment of bloodstream infection is important for prescription of appropriate antimicrobials. With prompt determination of the antimicrobial susceptibility of a causative agent, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) can help select the appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This clinical study is for evaluation of the clinical performance of the QMAC-dRAST for rapid AST directly from positive blood culture (PBC)s with Gram-positive cocci. METHODS: A total of 115 PBC samples with Gram-positive organisms (76 Staphylococcus spp. and 39 Enterococcus spp.) were evaluated by the QMAC-dRAST system, and their pure culture isolates were evaluated by the MicroScan WalkAway (Beckman Coulter, USA) as the comparative AST system. Thirteen antimicrobial agents were included, and the agreement and discrepancy rates of the QMAC-dRAST system (Quantamatrix Inc., Republic of Korea) compared to the MicroScan WalkAway were calculated. To resolve discrepancies, the broth microdilution method was performed. RESULTS: The QMAC-dRAST system exhibited a categorical agreement rate of 94.9% (1,126/1,187) and an essential agreement rate of 98.3% (1,167/1,187). The QMAC-dRAST system yielded very major (false-susceptible) errors at 1.0% (5/485), major (false-resistant) errors at 1.3% (9/693), and minor errors at 4.0% (47/1,187) compared to the MicroScan WalkAway. The QMAC-dRAST system significantly eliminated 30 hours of total turnaround time by combination of direct inoculation of PBC and an image-based approach. CONCLUSION: The results of the QMAC-dRAST system were highly accurate. Thereby, the QMAC-dRAST may provide essential information to accelerate therapeutic decisions for earlier and adequate antibiotic treatment and patient management in clinical settings.
Anti-Infective Agents
;
Bacteremia
;
Bioengineering
;
Clinical Study
;
Drug Resistance, Microbial
;
Enterococcus
;
Gram-Positive Cocci*
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
;
Prescriptions
;
Staphylococcus