1.Characteristics and prognostic factors of postoperative chemotherapy for female breast cancer patients under 30 years of age: a report of 129 patients.
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2005;27(2):111-113
OBJECTIVETo analyze the clinical characteristics, survival and prognosis of breast cancer patients under 30 years of age.
METHODS129 breast cancer patients under 30 years treated from Jan 1980 to May 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features, survival and prognostic factors were analyzed by SPSS 10.0 statistic software.
RESULTSBreast cancer patients under 30 years accounted for 2.6% of all breast cancers in our hospital. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 61.5% and 46.7%, respectively. For patients with tumor < or = 3 cm or > 3 cm, the 10-year survival rates were 65.5% and 27.4% (P < 0.01). For those with number of positive axillary lymph nodes 0, 1-3, or > or = 4, the 10-year survival rates were 79.5%, 40.9% or 31.4% (P < 0.01). For patients who had been treated with or without tamoxifen, the 10-year survival rates were 63.7% and 45% (P < 0.01). For those complicated with pregnancy and lactation which was found in 24.8% of such patients, the 10-year survival rate was 44.3%. In the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors that might improve the overall survival were tumor size, axillary metastatic status and tamoxifen treatment.
CONCLUSIONBreast cancer patients aged 30 years and younger may have good prognosis if multimodality treatment is given. Tumor size, axillary metastatic status and tamoxifen treatment are independent prognostic factors. Prognosis of patients, either complicated with pregnancy and lactation or not, is quite similar if the clinical stage is the same and if being treated by the combined therapy.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms ; secondary ; Breast Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast ; mortality ; secondary ; therapy ; Carcinoma, Medullary ; mortality ; secondary ; therapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lactation ; Lung Neoplasms ; secondary ; Mastectomy ; methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic ; pathology ; therapy ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Tamoxifen ; administration & dosage
2.Comparison of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for bone metastasis of breast cancer.
Min YAN ; San-Tai SONG ; Ze-Fei JIANG ; Shao-Hua ZHANG ; Xiao-Qing LIU ; Jian-Ming XU ; Tao WANG ; Wei-Dong LUO
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2004;26(3):177-180
OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of endocrine therapy with chemotherapy for bone metastasis of breast cancer.
METHODSA total of 138 breast cancer patients with bone metastasis, but without visceral metastasis as retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTSThe response rates of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy as the first-line therapy were 35.4% and 31.7% (P = 0.687), and the total response rates were 27.1% and 25.0% (P = 0.690). The clinical benefit rates of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy as first-line were 43.9% and 36.6% (P = 0.437), as second-line were 47.8% and 24.2% (P = 0.033), in total treatments were 47.5% and 27.7% (P = 0.001). The median interval to treatment failure (TTF) was 5 months and 2 months (P < 0.001), and that to progression (TTP) was 5 and 2.5 months (P < 0.001) in endocrine therapy and chemotherapy group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONEndocrine therapy is superior to chemotherapy for bone metastasis of breast cancer.
Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms ; secondary ; therapy ; Breast Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Failure
3.Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a follow-up study of the patients' survival time.
Shi-Ge ZHANG ; Jiu-Lin WANG ; Ye WU ; Ning SHAO ; Di QIAO ; Yi DING
National Journal of Andrology 2013;19(12):1103-1106
OBJECTIVETo explore the long-term survival and prognosis of prostate cancer patients after treated by androgen deprivation therapy.
METHODSWe conducted a follow-up study of 124 patients with prostate cancer treated by androgen deprivation therapy, and compared the survival times of the patients with different pathological grades and clinical characteristics using Kaplan-Meiers survival curves.
RESULTSThe mean survival time of the 124 patients after androgen deprivation therapy was 5. 912 years, with the median survival time of 7.81 years. The patients with bone metastases showed a shorter survival time than those with non-bone metastasis (P = 0.04). Pathological grades and PSA levels were not prognostic factors. No significant differences were found in the mean survival time between those died of prostate cancer (n = 35) and those from other factors (n = 23) (P = 0.50).
CONCLUSIONBone metastasis is an important prognostic factor in advanced prostate cancer following androgen deprivation therapy, which is more significantly correlated with the survival time of the patients than tumor grades and clinical classification.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgen Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms ; secondary ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; mortality ; therapy
4.Prognostic Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Bone-Only Metastasis after Therapy.
Tianzhu LU ; Qiaojuan GUO ; Xiaofei CUI ; Zhuhong CHEN ; Shaojun LIN ; Luying XU ; Jin LIN ; Jingfeng ZONG ; Jianji PAN
Yonsei Medical Journal 2016;57(4):840-845
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who developed bone-only metastasis after primary treatment and the stratification of these patients into different risk groups based on independent prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty NPC patients who developed bone-only metastasis after definitive radiotherapy from October 2005 to December 2010 were enrolled. All these patients received palliative treatment for bone metastasis, including chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Clinical features, treatment modality, and laboratory parameters were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 15.5 months (range, 2-67 months) for the whole cohort. The median overall metastatic survival (OMS) time and the 2-year estimate OMS rate were 26.5 months and 52%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with short metastases-free interval, multiple bone metastases sites, high serum lactic dehydrogenase levels, and treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone had significantly worse outcomes. Patients were stratified into three different risk groups based on the number of adverse factors present. The OMS curves of the three groups were all significantly different (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Severl prognostic factors were found to be associated with worse outcomes. According to the number of adverse factors present, bone-only metastasis patients can be stratified into three risk groups with significantly different prognoses. Such grouping may help in improving the design of clinical trials and in guiding individualized treatment for NPC patients with bone-only metastasis.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Bone Neoplasms/mortality/*secondary/therapy
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality/*pathology/therapy
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survival Rate
;
Young Adult
5.A prediction model of survival for patients with bone metastasis from uterine cervical cancer.
Hiroko MATSUMIYA ; Yukiharu TODO ; Kazuhira OKAMOTO ; Sho TAKESHITA ; Hiroyuki YAMAZAKI ; Katsushige YAMASHIRO ; Hidenori KATO
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2016;27(6):e55-
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to establish a predictive model of survival period after bone metastasis from cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with bone metastasis from cervical cancer were included in the study. Data at the time of bone metastasis diagnosis, which included presence of extraskeletal metastasis, performance status, history of any previous radiation or chemotherapy, the number of bone metastases, onset period, and treatment were collected. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median survival period after diagnosis of bone metastasis was 22 weeks (5 months). The 26- and 52-week survival rates after bone metastasis were 36.5% and 15.4%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that extraskeletal metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 6.1; 95% CI, 2.2 to 16.6), performance status of 3 to 4 (HR, 7.8; 95% CI, 3.3 to 18.2), previous radiation or chemotherapy (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.8), multiple bone metastases (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.5), and a bone metastasis-free interval of <12 months (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.3) were significantly and independently related to poor survival. A prognostic score was calculated by adding the number of each significant factor. The 26-week survival rates after diagnosis of bone metastasis were 70.1% in the group with a score ≤2, 46.7% in the group with a score of 3, and 12.5% in the group with a score ≥4 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This scoring system provided useful prognostic information on survival of patients with bone metastasis of cervical cancer.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Bone Neoplasms/*mortality/*secondary/therapy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Survival Rate
;
United States/epidemiology
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*pathology/therapy