3.The Association between Carotid Atherosclerosis and Glucose.
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2011;35(5):466-468
No abstract available.
Carotid Artery Diseases
;
Glucose
6.Epidemiology of Peripheral Arterial Diseases in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus
Journal of Korean Diabetes 2019;20(1):10-16
Epidemiologic studies have revealed diabetes mellitus is an important determining factor not only for the presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) but also for the severity of PAD. As PAD is closely related to mortality and morbidity in individuals with diabetes as well as the general population, the primary prevention for PAD is very important. Age, disease duration, the level of hyperglycemia, blood pressure, and smoking status are independent risk factors for development of PAD in diabetic patients, and management of those risk factors might be an effective tool for reducing PAD burden.
Blood Pressure
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Epidemiologic Studies
;
Epidemiology
;
Humans
;
Hyperglycemia
;
Mortality
;
Peripheral Arterial Disease
;
Primary Prevention
;
Risk Factors
;
Smoke
;
Smoking
7.Response: Effects of Aerobic Exercise Intensity on Insulin Resistance in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Korean Diabetes J 33:(5)401-411, 2009).
Yun Hyi KU ; Bo Kyung KOO ; Kyung Wan MIN
Korean Diabetes Journal 2009;33(6):549-550
No abstract available.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Exercise
;
Humans
;
Insulin
;
Insulin Resistance
8.The Effects of Low-Calorie Diets on Abdominal Visceral Fat, Muscle Mass, and Dietary Quality in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Subjects.
Hee Jung AHN ; Youn Ok CHO ; Hwi Ryun KWON ; Yun Hyi KU ; Bo Kyung KOO ; Kyung Ah HAN ; Kyung Wan MIN
Korean Diabetes Journal 2009;33(6):526-536
BACKGROUND: Weight loss through low-calorie diets (LCDs) decreases visceral fat (VF). However, the effects on muscle mass, changes of dietary quality, and insulin sensitivity are unknown for Korean obese type 2 diabetic subjects. Therefore, this study examined such effects of LCDs. METHODS: A total of 30 obese type 2 diabetic subjects (body mass index, 27.0 +/- 2.2 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to an LCD or control group. Subjects on LCDs took 500~1,000 kcal fewer energy than their usual dietary intake (1,000~1,500 kcal/day) over the course of 12 weeks. The abdominal VF and femoral muscle mass were evaluated by computed tomography, and insulin sensitivity was assessed using an insulin tolerance test (Kitt; rate constant for plasma glucose disappearance, %/min). Dietary nutrient intake consumed by subjects was assessed by 3-day food records. RESULTS: The percent VF reduction was -23.4 +/- 17.2% in the LCD group and -9.8 +/- 11.8% in the control group after 12 weeks (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). However, significant decrease in femoral mass or proportional change of marcronutrient intake and mean adequacy ratio were not found in the LCD group, as compared to the control group. Insulin sensitivity improved in the LCD group, as compared to the control group (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: LCD effectively improved insulin sensitivity and reduced abdominal VF without reduction of femoral muscle and dietary quality in obese type 2 diabetic subjects.
Caloric Restriction
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Glucose
;
Insulin
;
Insulin Resistance
;
Intra-Abdominal Fat
;
Muscles
;
Plasma
;
Weight Loss
9.Relationship of Maximal Muscle Strength with Body Mass Index and Aerobics Capacity in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.
Hwi Ryun KWON ; Kyung Ah HAN ; Yun Hyi KU ; Hee Jung AHN ; Bo Kyung KOO ; Kyung Wan MIN
Korean Diabetes Journal 2009;33(6):511-517
BACKGROUND: Combination fitness regimens (including aerobic and resistance exercises) are effective for improving cardio-respiratory fitness, reducing visceral fat and increasing insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients. The combination exercise intensity that a patient is capable of is limited by his or her aerobic capacity and one repetition maximum (1RM). We investigated the relationships between 1RM, aerobic exercise capacity and body mass index in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 177 (men: 85, women: 92) diabetic subjects with HbA1c < or = 10% were enrolled. Muscle strength and 1RM were assessed bychest press (upper body) and leg press (lower body). We assessed aerobic capacity by VO2max and muscle mass by bioimpedance analysis. RESULTS: There was no correlation between 1RM and VO2max in type 2 diabetic patients (upper: P = 0.122, lower: P = 0.138 for men, and upper: P = 0.952, lower: P = 0.570 for women). However, 1RM was significantly correlated with muscle mass both in men and women (upper: r = 0.493, P < 0.001, r = 0.315, P = 0.002 lower: r = 0.437 P < 0.001, r = 0.307, P =0.003, respectively). There was also a significant correlation between 1RM and BMI. In obese male subjects with BMI > or = 25 kg/m2, we observed a significant correlation between muscle mass and BMI (r = 0.374, P = 0.032), but this correlation was not observed in women. CONCLUSION: Clinicians treating Korean type 2 diabetic subjects should recommend resistance exercise to their patients. In particular, obese women with diabetes may receive greater benefits by increasing muscle mass through resistance exercises.
Body Mass Index
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Exercise
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Insulin Resistance
;
Intra-Abdominal Fat
;
Leg
;
Male
;
Muscle Strength
;
Muscles
;
Resistance Training
10.The Effects of Resistance Training on Muscle and Body Fat Mass and Muscle Strength in Type 2 Diabetic Women.
Hwi Ryun KWON ; Kyung Ah HAN ; Yun Hyi KU ; Hee Jung AHN ; Bo Kyung KOO ; Ho Chul KIM ; Kyung Wan MIN
Korean Diabetes Journal 2010;34(2):101-110
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to investigate the effects of low intensity resistance training on body fat, muscle mass and strength, cardiovascular fitness, and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-eight overweight women with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to a resistance training group (RG, n = 13) or a control group (CG, n = 15). RG performed resistance training using elastic bands, of which strength was equal to 40 to 50% of one repetition maximum (1RM), for three days per week. Each exercise consisted of three sets for 60 minutes. We assessed abdominal fat using computed tomography, muscle mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and muscle strength using Keiser's chest and leg press. Insulin sensitivity was measured using the insulin tolerance test, and aerobic capacity was expressed as oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (AT-VO2) before and after the 12-week exercise program. RESULTS: The age of participants was 56.4 +/- 7.1 years, duration of diabetes was 5.9 +/- 5.5 years, and BMI was 27.4 +/- 2.5 kg/m2, without significant differences between two groups. During intervention, a greater increase in muscle mass and greater decreases in both total fat mass and abdominal fat were observed in RG compared to those of CG (P = 0.015, P = 0.011, P = 0.010, respectively). Increase in 1RM of upper and lower extremities was observed in the RG (P = 0.004, P = 0.040, respectively), without changes in AT-VO2 and insulin resistance in either group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the low intensity resistance training was effective in increasing muscle mass and strength and reducing total fat mass without change of insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients.
Abdominal Fat
;
Absorptiometry, Photon
;
Adipose Tissue
;
Anaerobic Threshold
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Insulin
;
Insulin Resistance
;
Leg
;
Lower Extremity
;
Muscle Strength
;
Muscles
;
Overweight
;
Oxygen
;
Resistance Training
;
Thorax