PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiologic findings of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) using mammography and ultrasonography, and to correlate the radiologic and histopathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four pathologically proven lesions in 64 patients who were examined between March 2000 and March 2003 were the subject of this study. Mammography was performed in all 64 cases, and ultrasonography in 30. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated the radiologic findings, classifying them as one of four types: mass, microcalcification, other finding, and no detected lesion. At mammography, masses were classified according to their shape, margin, and density and microcalcifications according to their shape and distribution. At ultrasonography, masses were evaluated in terms of their shape, margin, internal and posterior echotexture, ductal extension, and parallelism to skin. Geographic correlation between the radiologic and histopathologic findings was classified as direct, near direct, or remote correlation. RESULTS: Mammography demonstrated 37 cases of microcalcification (57.8%), 14 in which masses were present (21.9%), two in which there were other findings (3.1%), and 11 in which lesions were not detected (17.2%). The "other finding" was ductectasia. Microcalcifications were round in 19 cases, pleomorphic heterogeneous in 16, and branching linear in one. The most common distribution of microcalcification was clustered (29 cases; 78.4%). Masses were oval or round in nine cases and irregular in three, and in seven cases their margin was ill-defined. In 13 cases, the density of the masses was equal to that of breast tissue. Ultrasonography showed that the masses were round or oval in 15 cases and irregular in 14, and that the margin was ill-defined in 16 cases and circumscribed in ten. In 19 cases, the echotexture of the masses was low, and in 20 cases, heterogeneous. Parallel orientation was seen in 25 cases, and ductal extension in 22. Category 4 was the most common final assessed BI-RADS category, found in 75% of cases. Radiologic-histopathologic correlation was direct in 44 cases, near direct in 13, and remote in seven. Clinically, self or clinical examination of the breast revealed no abnormality in 47 cases, a palpable mass in seven, nipple discharge in seven, and breast pain in three. CONCLUSION: At mammography, the most common finding of ADH was clustered round or pleomorphic heterogeneous microcalcifications, and at ultrasonography, illdefined, round or oval, or irregular-shaped, hypoechoic masses with parallel orientation and ductal extension. Clinically, most ADH was incidentally discovered at radiologic examination. In this study, 17.2% of ADH cases were not demonstrated by mammography but were detected at ultrasonography, and for the detection of ADH, the use of this latter modality, alongside mammography, is thus feasible.
Breast Neoplasms ; Breast* ; Humans ; Hyperplasia* ; Mammography ; Mastodynia ; Nipples ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin ; Ultrasonography

We report a case of old gravel aspiration in a 57-year-old man who had been accidentally buried in a field of construction for ten hours, three years prior. A chest radiograph showed peribronchial pneumonic infiltrates in the right lower lobe, with a proximal ovoid radiopaque endobronchial density at the trunchus basalis. These findings were more clearly visualized on the 64-channel multidetector CT (MDCT). Moreover, the patient recovered from his condition, following a bronchoscopic retrieval. However, the patient had persistent bronchiectasis of the right lower lobe on a subsequent follow-up chest radiograph, one month later.
Adult ; Bronchiectasis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Foreign Bodies ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Thorax ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

PURPOSE: The subareolar area is often difficult to evaluate ultrasonographically due to tissue shadowing, which obscures visualization of ducts and parenchymal tissue. The purpose of this study is to determine if real-time compound imaging improves evaluation of normal subareolar tissue and solid nodules in subareolar area compared to conventional ultrasonography. METHODS: 190 images of the subareolar area were obtained from 135 patients from March 2001 to July 2002. Thirty-three of 190 images showed solid nodules, extraductal nodules in 30 and intraductal nodules in three. We scanned both conventional and compound imaging with a stationary probe, to maintain an identical projection and tissue pressure. We used two compound techniques; survey mode (S) is made by 3 coplanar images and target mode (T) by 9 coplanar images. The evaluating points were 1) reduction in the density of shadowing, 2) resolution of duct wall, 3) resolution of duct lumen, 4) margin of nodule, and 5) internal echoes of nodule. In a blinded fashion, three radiologists graded the quality of images on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: For reviewer 1/2/3, S showed grade improvements in 1) reduction in the density of shadowing (0.4+/-0.6/1.1 0.6/0.5+/-0.5), 2) resolution of duct wall (0.9+/-0.2/1.5+/-0.6/1.0+/-0.5), 3) resolution of duct lumen (0.9+/-0.2/1.6 +/-0.6/0.7+/-0.6), 4) margin of nodule (1.0+/-0.3/1.5+/-0.5/1.2+/-0.5), and 5) internal echoes of nodule (1.1+/-0.3/1.5+/- 0.5/1.2+/-0.4) and T showed grade improvements in 1) reduction in the density of shadowing (0.4+/-0.6/1.2+/-0.6/0.7+/-0.7), 2) resolution of duct wall (1.0+/-0.3/1.5+/-0.6/1.1+/-0.5), 3) resolution of duct lumen (0.9+/-0.3/1.6+/-0.6/0.8+/-0.6), 4) margin of nodule (1.0+/-0.3/1.5+/-0.6/1.2+/-0.5), and 5) internal echoes of nodule (1.1+/-0.3/1.5+/-0.6/1.3+/-0.4). In all evaluating points, two modes of real-time compound imaging were superior to conventional imaging (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between two modes of compound imaging. CONCLUSION: Real-time compound imaging improves evaluation of normal subareolar tissue and subareolar solid nodules compared to conventional ultrasonography by reducing shadowing and increasing anatomic resolution of ducts.
Breast ; Humans ; Shadowing (Histology) ; Ultrasonography*

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate any difference of ultrasound findings for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers. METHODS: Two hundred breast cancer patients that had undergone preoperative ultrasound and surgery were enrolled in the study. A total of 126 cancers were palpable, and the remaining 74 cancers were nonpalpable. We compared lesion characteristics using ultrasound images according to the BI-RADS(R)-Ultrasound guidelines of the American College of Radiology. A crude odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for a comparison of the palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers. RESULTS: Nonpalpable cancers displayed more often an oval shape (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.17-0.70), no posterior acoustic features (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.28-0.89), and a parallel orientation (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.28-0.89). An irregular shape (OR=2.98, 95% CI=1.60-5.54), a spiculated margin (OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.23-5.74), and a combined pattern of posterior acoustic features (OR=7.20, 95% CI=1.64-31.66) were more commonly observed in the palpable cancers. CONCLUSION: Palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers were found to have different ultrasound characteristics.
Acoustics ; Breast ; Breast Neoplasms ; Humans ; Odds Ratio ; Orientation ; Palpation

No abstract available.
Bowen's Disease*

In the article, the weighted overall mean MLA cut-off value has been miscalculated. Tha authors deeply apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused.

PURPOSE: The incidence of breast cancer is continuously increasing in Korea, and the age of the initially detected breast cancer is younger than western people. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological, pathological, and clinical findings of breast cancers according to age and then contribute to the basis of screening program of breast cancer. METHODS: Retrospectively, the 325 patients who had pathologically confirmed breast cancer were included in this study. The patients were classified into 6 groups according to age, 20~29, 30~39, 40~49, 50~59, 60~69, and more than 70 years. We evaluated the radiological findings of 325 cases of mammography and 144 cases of breast ultrasonography, classified as four types; mass, microcalcification, others, and non-detected lesion, and then analyzed radiological findings according to age. We evaluated pathological and clinical findings according to age and compared with radiological findings. We used Mantel-Haenszel's chi 2 test and trend test for comparison according to age. RESULTS: The incidence of breast cancer was 61 cases (19%) in 30~39 years, 122 (38%) in 40~49 years, 92 (28%) in 50~59 years. Most of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma, 258 (79%) and in situ carcinoma was 32 (10%). Most of in situ carcinoma was detected in 20~59 years, 31/32 (97%). Mammography showed mass in 237 (73%), microcalcification in 45 (14%), other finding in 13 (4%), and non-detected lesion in 30 (9%). Twenty-one (47%) of 45 cases with microcalcification were in situ carcinoma and most of in situ carcinoma was presented as microcalcification on mammography, 21/32 (66%). In twenty-eight of 30 cases (93%) with non-detected lesion on mammography, breast cancer was detected on ultrasonography. In terms of clinical findings, there was no symptom in 12/32 (38%) with in situ carcinoma and 57/258 (22%) with invasive ductal carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The incidence of breast cancer is abruptly increasing from 4th decades and there is no significant difference in radiological and clinical findings according to age. But, most of in situ carcinoma was detected in 20~59 years and presented as microcalcification on mammography. Thus, Screening mammography should be considered from 4th decades.
Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Carcinoma, Ductal ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Korea ; Mammography ; Mass Screening ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasonography, Mammary

PURPOSE: To evaluate normal human gastric wall layers in vitro using magnetic resonance*(MR) imaging, to correlate the results with the histologic findings, and to determine the optimal technique for evaluation of the gastric wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one normal resected gastric specimens obtained from 25 patients were dissected and placed in a polyethylene tube filled with normal saline. MR imaging with four MR sequences, T1-weighted FLASH*(T1FLASH), fat-saturated T1-weighted FLASH, T2-weighted TSE*(T2TSE), and True-FISP, was performed. The number of gastric wall layers and signal intensity of each layer were determined, and after correlating MR images with the histologic findings, the conspicuity of each layer*(mucosa, submucosa, and muscle), the distinction between each layer, and overall image quality were assessed. RESULTS: The gastric wall was shown by TIFLASH to have two (n=6, 14-6%), three (n=31, 75.6%) and four layers (n=4, 9.8%); by fat-saturated TIFLASH to have two (n=6, 14.6%) and three (n=35, 85.4%) ; by T2TSE to have three (n=24, 58.5%), four (n=11, 26.8%), and five (n=6, 14.6%); and by True-FISP to have one (n=2, 4.9%), two (n=8, 19.5%), three (n=23, 56%), four (n=4, 9.8%), and five (n=4, 9.8%) . The signal intensity of each layer at T1FLASH and fat-saturated T1FLASH was high-intermediate from the lumen in two-layer cases, high-low-high/intermediate in three-layer cases, and high-low-high-intermediate in four-layer cases. The signal intensity of each layer at T2TSE was intermediate/high-low-intermediate in three-layer cases, intermediate low-high-intermediate/low in four-layer cases, and low-high-low-high-low in five-layer cases. Three-layered gastric wall corresponded mostly to mucosa, submucosa, and muscle from the inner to outer layers, respectively. T1FLASH, fat-saturated T1FLASH, and T2TSE were superior to True-FISP in evaluating the gastric wall. T1FLASH and fat-saturated T1FLASH were the best sequences for demonstrating mucosa (p<0.05), and T2TSE was the best for submucosa and the distinction between this and muscle (p<0.05). Both T1FLASH and T2TSE provided the best overall image quality (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In-vitro MR imaging is an excellent technique for the evaluation of layers of normal gastric wall. T2TSE is the sequence which best demonstrates the conspicuity of submucosa, the distinction between submucosa and muscle, and overall image quality.
Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging* ; Mucous Membrane ; Polyethylene

PURPOSE: Real-time compound imaging obtains multiple coplanar tomographic ultrasound images and combines them into a single compound image, reducing acoustic artifacts and noise. The purpose of this study is to determine if real-time compound imaging improves evaluation of breast cancer compared to conventional sonography. METHODS: From May 2000 to July 2001, we scanned the same axial plane with conventional sonography and real-time compound imaging in 520 patients with solid breast nodules. Twenty-eight cancers in 25 patients which were confirmed pathologically were included in this study. Twenty-five of 28 cases were invasive ductal carcinoma and the remaining three were ductal carcinoma in situ. Each image pair consisted of a conventional ultrasound and a real-time compound image with a stationary probe, to maintain an identical projection. The evaluating points were 1) contrast between cancer and normal breast tissue, 2) depiction of margin, 3) clarity of internal echotexture, 4) clarity of posterior echo pattern, and 5) clarity of internal microcalcifi-cation. Two radiologists graded for quality of images on a 5-point scale and in a blinded fashion and Wilcoxon rank test was used for comparison between conventional and real-time compound images. RESULTS: For reviewer 1/reviewer 2, compound image showed grade improvements in 1) contrast (1.4?0.5/1.4?0.7), 2) margin (1.4?0.5/1.8?0.4), 3) internal echotexture (1.0?0.5/1.4?0.7), 4) posterior echo pattern (?0.9?0.7/?0.8?0.7), and 5) internal microcalcification (1.8?0.5/1.8?0.5). In all evaluating points, there was statistically significant difference between conventional and compound images (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Real-time compound imaging improves contrast, depiction of margin, and clarity of internal echotexture and internal microcalcification of the breast cancer. But compound image is not effective to evaluate posterior echo pattern of the breast cancer.
Acoustics ; Artifacts ; Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Carcinoma, Ductal ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating ; Humans ; Noise ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound-guided needle localization has been used prior to the surgical excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility of the use of a saline immersion specimen ultrasound technique (immersion-US) to confirm the successful removal of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The devised immersion-US technique was used to examine the excised tissues of 72 ultrasound-guided needle localized breast lesions of 58 patients (34 benign lesions, 30 high-risk lesions and 8 malignant lesions). Freshly excised specimens were placed in a container filled with saline and one radiologist scanned the surgically excised specimens using a high-frequency linear transducer. We evaluated successful lesion removal and the qualities of the immersion-US images. Miss rates were determined by the use of postoperative ultrasound during follow-up. RESULTS: All 72 lesions were identified by the use of immersion-US and satisfactory or excellent quality images were obtained for most lesions (70/72, 97%). Five (7%) lesions were initially identified as incompletely excised, based on the immersion-US findings, and prompt re-excision was undertaken. Follow-up ultrasound examinations showed no residual mass in the surgical field in any patient. CONCLUSION: The immersion-US technique was found straightforward and efficient to perform. Immersion-US was able to determine whether nonpalpable breast lesions had been successfully excised after ultrasound-guided needle localization.
Adult ; Biopsy, Needle/methods ; Breast Neoplasms/*ultrasonography ; Female ; Humans ; Immersion ; Mammography ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Ultrasonography/*methods ; Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods