Blood Banks ; standards ; Blood Transfusion ; standards ; Humans ; Safety Management ; Singapore

BACKGROUND: One of the major concerns with biobanking is the absence of standard operating procedures to eliminate pre-analytical variation arising from sample collection, preparation, and storage. Currently, there is a lack of tools to carry out quality control procedures for stored blood samples. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of stored blood samples in our biobank and to suggest appropriate indicators for their quality control. METHODS: The stored blood samples that we tested have been registered into our biobank since 2003. These were transferred to our biobank after carrying out routine requested tests, because the samples would have otherwise been discarded. For the purpose of quality control, we analyzed the concentrations and the integrity of DNA and RNA extracted from the stored samples and tested the levels of several serum proteins; the results were compared with the corresponding pre-storage levels. RESULTS: A total of 19 samples were stored from 2006 to 2009. Of the 22 samples stored between 2003 and 2005, 50% showed complete DNA integrity. However, sufficient RNA integrity was noted in only 1 sample stored as recently as 2009. High blood urea nitrogen levels were also noted in the stored sera, but the increase did not correlate to the duration of storage. CONCLUSIONS: The amount and integrity of nucleic acids extracted from stored blood samples are potential indicators that can be used for quality control. A guideline for the quality assessment of stored blood samples in a biobank is urgently needed.
Blood Banks/*standards ; Blood Proteins/chemistry/standards ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; DNA/*analysis/chemistry/standards ; Laboratory Techniques and Procedures ; Quality Control ; RNA/*analysis/chemistry/standards ; Specimen Handling/methods

BACKGROUND: Maintaining the quality of cryopreserved cord blood is crucial. In this pilot study, we describe the results of the internal quality control program for a cord blood bank thus far. METHODS: Donated cord blood units unsuitable for transplantation were selected for internal quality control once a month. One unit of cord blood, aliquoted into 21 capillaries, was cryopreserved and thawed annually to analyze the total nucleated cell count, CD34⁺ cell count, cell viability test, and colony-forming units assay. RESULTS: No significant differences in the variables (total nucleated cell count, cell viability, CD34⁺ cell count) were observed between samples cryopreserved for one and two years. Upon comparing the variables before cryopreservation and post thawing with the capillaries of one year of storage, cell viability and CD34⁺ cell counts decreased significantly. The use of cord blood samples in capillaries, which can be easily stored for a long period, was similar to the methods used for testing segments attached to the cord blood unit. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study may be useful for determining the period during which the quality of cryopreserved cord blood units used for transplantation is maintained.
Antigens, CD34/metabolism ; Blood Banks ; Cell Count ; Cell Survival ; Cryopreservation/*standards ; Fetal Blood/*cytology ; Humans ; Pilot Projects ; Quality Control ; Republic of Korea ; Time Factors

OBJECTIVETo investigate the blood quality of blood banks.

METHODSHBsAg, Anti-HCV, Anti-HIV were detected by enzyme linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA). Treponema pallidum was detected by Trust or rapid plasma regain card test (RPR) before August 2001 and ELISA was used afterwards. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was detected by Reitman-Frankel before December 1999 and by continuous monitoring assay afterwards. Results were compared between (1) sampling and spot check, (2) different determent methods, (3) two kinds of reagents with different antigen coating.

RESULTSSeventy-two (8.28 per thousand ) of the 8,699 plasma samples were found unqualified with levels of anti-HCV, ALT, HBsAg, Treponema pallidum and anti-HIV 24 (2.76 per thousand ), 19 (2.18 per thousand ), 16 (1.84 per thousand ), 7 (0.80 per thousand ), 6 (0.69 per thousand ), respectively. There were significant differences between different determent methods and different reagents, but only ALT showed significant difference in the sampling and spot check.

CONCLUSIONThe unqualified samples were associated with testing methods, quality of reagents as well as ability and responsibility of the staff.

Alanine Transaminase ; blood ; Blood Banks ; standards ; Blood Donors ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; isolation & purification ; China ; D-Alanine Transaminase ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; HIV Antibodies ; blood ; HIV Seropositivity ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; blood ; Hepatitis C Antibodies ; blood ; Humans ; Quality Control

BACKGROUND: This study compared the estimated costs and times required for ABO/Rh(D) typing and unexpected antibody screening using an automated system and manual methods. METHODS: The total cost included direct and labor costs. Labor costs were calculated on the basis of the average operator salaries and unit values (minutes), which was the hands-on time required to test one sample. To estimate unit values, workflows were recorded on video, and the time required for each process was analyzed separately. RESULTS: The unit values of ABO/Rh(D) typing using the manual method were 5.65 and 8.1 min during regular and unsocial working hours, respectively. The unit value was less than 3.5 min when several samples were tested simultaneously. The unit value for unexpected antibody screening was 2.6 min. The unit values using the automated method for ABO/Rh(D) typing, unexpected antibody screening, and both simultaneously were all 1.5 min. The total cost of ABO/Rh(D) typing of only one sample using the automated analyzer was lower than that of testing only one sample using the manual technique but higher than that of testing several samples simultaneously. The total cost of unexpected antibody screening using an automated analyzer was less than that using the manual method. CONCLUSIONS: ABO/Rh(D) typing using an automated analyzer incurs a lower unit value and cost than that using the manual technique when only one sample is tested at a time. Unexpected antibody screening using an automated analyzer always incurs a lower unit value and cost than that using the manual technique.
ABO Blood-Group System/blood ; Antibodies/analysis ; Automation ; Blood Banks/*economics/*standards ; Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/*economics/instrumentation ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Humans ; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/blood ; *Workflow ; Workload