OBJECTIVEStudy on the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy of cervical lymph nodes and to discuss the reasons of making a misdiagnosis.

METHODSFive hundred and eighty cases of cervical lymph node fine needle aspiration biopsy were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, histologic findings were available in 161 cases. The cytologic and histologic diagnoses were compared.

RESULTSThere were altogether 226 cases of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, 202 cases of specific inflammation, 45 cases of malignant lymphoma and 107 cases of metastatic carcinoma. The concordance rate between the cytologic and corresponding histologic diagnoses was 94.4%. The primary foci of most cases with metastatic carcinoma could be delineated by reviewing the clinical and pathologic finding. Inadequate cellularity was the main reason of making misdiagnosis and useful diagnostic clues might be obtained by careful study of the clinical findings.

CONCLUSIONSFine needle aspiration biopsy of cervical lymph node carries a high diagnostic accuracy. It provides important clues in guiding subsequent clinical management. However, for detailed subtyping of certain disease entities such as malignant lymphoma, surgical biopsy for histologic and immunohistochemical studies are required.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; methods ; Biopsy, Needle ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; Child ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; Lymphoma ; diagnosis ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult

Objective: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of "one-puncture one-needle" transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in the prevention of postoperative infections. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about "one-puncture one-needle" (the observation group) and "one-person one-needle" (the control group) TRUS-guided prostate biopsy performed in the Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province from January 2005 to December 2015, and compared the incidence rates of puncture-related infection between the two strategies. By "one-puncture one-needle", one needle was used for one biopsy puncture, while by "one-person one-needle", one needle was used for all biopsy punctures in one patient and the needle was sterilized with iodophor after each puncture. RESULTS: Totally, 120 patients received 6+1-core or 12+1-core "one-person one-needle" and 466 underwent 12+1-core "one-puncture one-needle" TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in age, the prostate volume, the serum PSA level, or the detection rate of prostate cancer (P >0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group showed remarkably lower incidence rates of puncture-related urinary tract infection (7.5% vs 0.9%, P <0.05), fever (5.0% vs 1.1%, P <0.05), bacteriuria (2.5% vs 0.2%, P <0.05), and total infections (16.7% vs 2.6%, P<0.05) postoperatively. Two cases of bacteremia or sepsis were found in each of the groups, with no significant difference between the two. CONCLUSIONS "One-puncture one-needle" TRUS-guided prostate biopsy can effectively prevent puncture-related infections.
Bacteremia ; etiology ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Case-Control Studies ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Prostate ; pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; blood ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterilization ; methods ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urinary Tract Infections ; prevention & control

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Techniques for endoscopic evaluation of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions include conventional endoscopy, jumbo biopsy, endoscopic ultrasonogrphy (EUS), EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, and endoscopic submucosal resection. However, these procedures have many limitations, such as low diagnostic yields and high complication rates. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic yield for tissue sampling of incidental subepithelial lesions using the bite-on-bite technique. METHODS: One hundred and forty subepithelial lesions were found in 129 patients during conventional diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy by one examiner from October 2003 to November 2004. Bite-on-bite biopsies with conventional-sized forceps were taken from 36 patients having 37 lesions that did not appear to be hypervascular or to have a thick overlying epithelium. Two to eight bites were performed to obtain submucosal tissue for one lesion. RESULTS: The bite-on-bite technique was diagnostic in 14 of the 37 lesions (38%). Blood oozing for more than 30 seconds occurred in five cases, but was easily controlled by epinephrine injection (2 cases) or hemoclip (3 cases). The diagnostic yield tended to be higher in the esophagus than in the stomach and duodenum (54% vs. 28%, p=0.109). CONCLUSIONS: The bite-on-bite technique for subepithelial lesions is an effective and safe method in selected cases. This technique may be useful for incidental subepithelial lesions, especially those of the esophagus, except for ones with a high risk of bleeding or thick overlying epithelium.
Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy/adverse effects/instrumentation/*methods ; Duodenum/*pathology ; *Endoscopy, Digestive System/adverse effects ; Esophagus/*pathology ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/pathology ; Hemorrhage/etiology/prevention & control ; Hemostatic Techniques ; Humans ; *Incidental Findings ; Intestinal Mucosa/pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Stomach/*pathology ; Surgical Instruments