1.Clinical analysis of distal bile duct cancer.
Tae Won KWON ; Sung Gyu LEE ; Suk Joon HONG ; Duck Jong HAN ; Kun Choon PARK ; Suk Koo KIM ; Pyung Chul MIN
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;44(1):109-118
No abstract available.
Bile Duct Neoplasms*
;
Bile Ducts*
;
Bile*
2.Significance of chromogranin-A expression in the bile duct cancer.
Sun Whe KIM ; Woo Ho KIM ; Sam Je CHO ; Yong Hyun PARK
Journal of the Korean Cancer Association 1993;25(4):501-506
No abstract available.
Bile Duct Neoplasms*
;
Bile Ducts*
;
Bile*
3.A clinical analysis of unresectable bile duct cancer.
Won Shik LIM ; Young Don MIN ; Hyun Jin CHO ; Hong Joon CHEON
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1991;41(1):47-54
No abstract available.
Bile Duct Neoplasms*
;
Bile Ducts*
;
Bile*
4.Factors Affecting the Yield of Cholangioscopic Biopsy in the Patients with Bile Duct Cancer.
Ju Sang PARK ; Dong Wan SEO ; Yeon Ho JOO ; Sung Koo LEE ; Myung Hwan KIM ; Young Il MIN
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2001;22(3):146-151
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study analyzed the factors associated with the yield of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic biopsies in patients with bile duct cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients who had received percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and who had been confirmed as having bile duct cancer were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: When the location of the tumor was divided into intrahepatic (IHD), hilar and common bile duct, the biopsy yield was significantly higher in IHD cancer (93.7%) than in cases of hilar cancer (69.6%) (p<0.05). After a bile duct cancer had been classified as a nodular (n=31), papillary (n=27) or infiltrative type (n=58) upon cholangioscopic findings, the biopsy yields from nodular (96.8%) or papillary types (96.3%) were significantly higher than from infiltrative types (58.6%; p<0.01). However, cholangioscopic classification of bile duct cancer was the only independent factor affecting biopsy yield by multiple logistic regression analysis (p=0.001). The sensitivity of the combination of cholangioscopic biopsy and tumor vessel in overall bile duct cancer, especially in the infiltrative type, was significantly increased when it was compared with that for cholangioscopic biopsies (p<0.01) or for tumor vessels alone (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The cholangioscopic classification of bile duct tumors might provide important clues to predict biopsy yield.
Bile Duct Neoplasms*
;
Bile Ducts*
;
Bile*
;
Biopsy*
;
Classification
;
Common Bile Duct
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
6.Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer.
Naru KIM ; Huisong LEE ; Seog Ki MIN ; Hyeon Kook LEE
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2018;94(5):240-246
PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 vs. 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4–169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected.
Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Bile Ducts*
;
Bile*
;
Cholangiocarcinoma
;
Common Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Common Bile Duct*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy*
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Surgeons
7.The Prognostic Significance of Transfusion in Periampullary Cancer Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Sang Jae PARK ; Sun Whe KIM ; Jin Young JANG ; Kuhn Uk LEE ; Yong Hyun PARK
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2000;59(3):291-297
PURPOSE: There are several reports that intraoperative transfusion may be a prognostic factor in periampullary cancer, but it is not conclusive. The purpose of this study is to clarify the prognostic significance of a transfusion following a pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. METHODS: We analyzed 357 periampullary cancers from 1985 to 1997 (ampullary cancer: 130 cases; distal bile duct cancer: 141 cases; and pancreatic head cancer: 86 cases). Analytic variables for possible prognostic factors were various clinicopathologic factors combined with the presence of the perioperative transfusion. RESULTS: Of the overall 357 patients, 215 (60%) have received an intraoperative transfusion. The 5-year survival rate of the 130 ampullary cancer patients was 59%, and 76 cases (58%) underwent an intra operative transfusion. The 5-year survival rate of patients without intraoperative transfusion was 79% whereas that of patients with a transfusion was 47% (p=0.029). Following multivariate analysis, an intraoperative transfusion was an independent prognostic factor in ampullary cancer (relative risk: 2.174). In common bile duct cancer, the overall 5-year survival rate was 33%, and the 5-year survival rates of patients with (N=87) or without (N=54) a transfusion were 25% and 38% respectively, which showed a marginal statistical significance (p=0.0717). In pancreatic head cancer, the overall 5-year survival rate was 16% and there was no survival difference between transfused (N=52) and untransfused (N=34) patients. CONCLUSION: In the present study, intraoperative transfusion was an independent significant prognostic factor in ampullary cancer. Careful dissection to minimize intraoperative bleeding is mandatory in pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer.
Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Common Bile Duct
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy*
;
Survival Rate
8.Technical knacks and outcomes of extended extrahepatic bile duct resection in patients with mid bile duct cancer.
Seung Jae LEE ; Shin HWANG ; Tae Yong HA ; Ki Hun KIM ; Chul Soo AHN ; Deok Bog MOON ; Gi Won SONG ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gil Chun PARK ; Sung Gyu LEE
Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2013;17(3):109-112
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Mid bile duct cancers often involve the proximal intrapancreatic bile duct, and resection of the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) can result in a tumor-positive distal resection margin (RM). We attempted a customized surgical procedure to obtain a tumor-free distal RM during EHBD resection, so that R0 resection can be achieved without performing pancreaticoduodenectomy through extended EHBD resection. METHODS: We previously reported the surgical procedures of extended EHBD resection, in which the intrapancreatic duct excavation resembles a > or =2 cm-long funnel. This unique procedure was performed in 11 cases of mid bile duct cancer occurring in elderly patients between the ages of 70 and 83 years. RESULTS: The tumor involved the intrapancreatic duct in all cases. Deep pancreatic excavation per se required about 30-60 minutes. Cancer-free hepatic duct RM was obtained in 10 patients. Prolonged leakage of pancreatic juice occurred in 2 patients, but all were controlled with supportive care. Adjuvant therapies were primarily applied to RM-positive or lymph node-positive patients. Their 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 90.9% and 60.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that extended EHBD resection can be performed as a beneficial option to achieve R0 resection in cases in which pancreaticoduodenectomy should be avoided due to various causes including old age and expectation of a poor outcome.
Aged
;
Bile
;
Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Bile Ducts
;
Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic
;
Hepatic Duct, Common
;
Humans
;
Pancreatic Juice
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Survival Rate
9.Radiological evaluation of primary bile duct cancer
Seung Woon CHO ; Ki Whang KIM ; Jong Tae LEE ; Chang Yun PARK
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1983;19(4):789-796
Primary carcinoma of the bile duct is uncommon but not rare and its prognosis is poor even though long-termsurvival had been reported. The authors presented 62 cases of bile duct cancer, which were confirmed at YUMC fromJan. 1971 to Dec. 1981. The results were as follows; 1. The most prevalent age group was 6th decade and a male-tofemale ratio was 1.9:1. 2. Jaundice was the most common clinical manifestations(84%), and followed by right
Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Bile Ducts
;
Bile
;
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
;
Common Bile Duct
;
Diagnosis
;
Dilatation
;
Hepatomegaly
;
Humans
;
Jaundice
;
Prognosis
;
Ultrasonography
10.The Role of Peroral Cholangioscopy in Evaluating Indeterminate Biliary Strictures
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(6):556-564
Biliary strictures are considered indeterminate when the initial radiologic evaluation and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy do not reveal diagnostic findings. Evaluation of these strictures is challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach and multiple procedures. Peroral cholangioscopy allows direct visualization of these lesions and targeted tissue acquisition using miniature biopsy forceps. In the past decade, there have been significant improvements in the field of cholangioscopy. These advances have allowed higher-quality image acquisition, easy setup, operation by a single operator, easy maneuverability, and excellent targeted tissue sampling performance. However, the interpretation of cholangioscopic visual findings remains challenging. In this review, we discuss the role of peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Bile Duct Diseases
;
Bile Duct Neoplasms
;
Biopsy
;
Cholangiocarcinoma
;
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Surgical Instruments