There is a significant need for research and understanding of underactive bladder (UAB). The International Congress of Urologic Research and Education on Aging UnderActive Bladder (CURE-UAB) was organized by Doctors Michael Chancellor and Ananias Diokno in order to address these concerns. CURE-UAB was supported, in part, by the US National Institute of Aging and National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney. Since 2014, there have been 5 successful CURE-UAB congresses. They have brought together diverse stakeholders in the UAB field to identify areas of major scientific challenge and initiated a call to action among the medical community. In this review, we will highlight current and novel treatments under development for UAB and the progress and impact from the CURE-UAB initiative.

Purpose: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is highly prevalent among patients with neurologic disorders. Some studies have demonstrated that implantable neuromodulation can improve symptoms of NLUTD. We seek to describe our experience with sacral and pudendal neuromodulation in patients with NLUTD. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with “neurogenic bladder” ICD-9/10 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/10th Revision) code was performed at a single institution. This included patients from 2008 to 2020 who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation trial. Demographic and clinical information was collected, including neurologic diagnosis, the character of patients’ voiding symptoms, the presence or absence of fecal incontinence, the need for intermittent catheterization, and whether patients had sufficient (>50%) improvement in their symptoms to undergo stage 2 implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement. Results: We identified 82 patients with neurologic diagnoses who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation. The most common diagnoses were diabetic cystopathy (17.07%), spinal surgery (17.07%), and spinal cord injury (12.20%). The most commonly reported symptoms were urinary urgency, and urge urinary incontinence. Overall, 59 patients (71.95%) advanced to stage 2 IPG placement including 72% of patients with sacral leads and 76% with pudendal leads. Conclusions Neuromodulation is feasible and effective in the treatment of NLUTD. Further investigation into its utilization is warranted.

Purpose: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is highly prevalent among patients with neurologic disorders. Some studies have demonstrated that implantable neuromodulation can improve symptoms of NLUTD. We seek to describe our experience with sacral and pudendal neuromodulation in patients with NLUTD. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with “neurogenic bladder” ICD-9/10 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/10th Revision) code was performed at a single institution. This included patients from 2008 to 2020 who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation trial. Demographic and clinical information was collected, including neurologic diagnosis, the character of patients’ voiding symptoms, the presence or absence of fecal incontinence, the need for intermittent catheterization, and whether patients had sufficient (>50%) improvement in their symptoms to undergo stage 2 implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement. Results: We identified 82 patients with neurologic diagnoses who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation. The most common diagnoses were diabetic cystopathy (17.07%), spinal surgery (17.07%), and spinal cord injury (12.20%). The most commonly reported symptoms were urinary urgency, and urge urinary incontinence. Overall, 59 patients (71.95%) advanced to stage 2 IPG placement including 72% of patients with sacral leads and 76% with pudendal leads. Conclusions Neuromodulation is feasible and effective in the treatment of NLUTD. Further investigation into its utilization is warranted.

Purpose: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is highly prevalent among patients with neurologic disorders. Some studies have demonstrated that implantable neuromodulation can improve symptoms of NLUTD. We seek to describe our experience with sacral and pudendal neuromodulation in patients with NLUTD. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with “neurogenic bladder” ICD-9/10 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/10th Revision) code was performed at a single institution. This included patients from 2008 to 2020 who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation trial. Demographic and clinical information was collected, including neurologic diagnosis, the character of patients’ voiding symptoms, the presence or absence of fecal incontinence, the need for intermittent catheterization, and whether patients had sufficient (>50%) improvement in their symptoms to undergo stage 2 implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement. Results: We identified 82 patients with neurologic diagnoses who underwent stage 1 neuromodulation. The most common diagnoses were diabetic cystopathy (17.07%), spinal surgery (17.07%), and spinal cord injury (12.20%). The most commonly reported symptoms were urinary urgency, and urge urinary incontinence. Overall, 59 patients (71.95%) advanced to stage 2 IPG placement including 72% of patients with sacral leads and 76% with pudendal leads. Conclusions Neuromodulation is feasible and effective in the treatment of NLUTD. Further investigation into its utilization is warranted.