1.Systematic Cross-biospecimen Evaluation of DNA Extraction Kits for Long-and Short-read Multi-metagenomic Sequencing Studies
Rehner JACQUELINE ; Schmartz Pierre GEORGES ; Groeger LAURA ; Dastbaz JAN ; Ludwig NICOLE ; Hannig MATTHIAS ; Rupf STEFAN ; Seitz BERTHOLD ; Flockerzi ELIAS ; Berger TIM ; Reichert Christian MATTHIAS ; Krawczyk MARCIN ; Meese ECKART ; Herr CHRISTIAN ; Bals ROBERT ; L.Becker S?REN ; Keller ANDREAS ; Müller ROLF
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2022;20(2):405-417
High-quality DNA extraction is a crucial step in metagenomic studies.Bias by different isolation kits impairs the comparison across datasets.A trending topic is,however,the analysis of multiple metagenomes from the same patients to draw a holistic picture of microbiota associated with diseases.We thus collected bile,stool,saliva,plaque,sputum,and conjunctival swab samples and performed DNA extraction with three commercial kits.For each combination of the specimen type and DNA extraction kit,20-gigabase(Gb)metagenomic data were generated using short-read sequencing.While profiles of the specimen types showed close proximity to each other,we observed notable differences in the alpha diversity and composition of the microbiota depending on the DNA extraction kits.No kit outperformed all selected kits on every specimen.We reached consistently good results using the Qiagen QiAamp DNA Microbiome Kit.Depending on the specimen,our data indicate that over 10 Gb of sequencing data are required to achieve sufficient resolution,but DNA-based identification is superior to identification by mass spectrometry.Finally,long-read nanopore sequencing confirmed the results(correlation coefficient＞0.98).Our results thus suggest using a strategy with only one kit for studies aiming for a direct comparison of multiple microbiotas from the same patients.
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail