1.The Association of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Dominic Wei TING YAP ; Nicole Kye WEN TAN ; Benjamin Kye JYN TAN ; Yao Hao TEO ; Veronique Kiak MIEN TAN ; Anna SEE ; Song Tar TOH
Journal of Breast Cancer 2022;25(3):149-163
Purpose:
Emerging evidence from animal models suggests that intermittent hypoxia due to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for breast cancer. Despite their biological plausibility, human epidemiological studies have reported conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to delineate this relationship.
Methods:
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies from inception until June 6, 2021. Two reviewers selected randomized trials or observational studies reporting the association between OSA and breast cancer incidence compared with those without OSA. Two reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). We pooled the maximally covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects inverse varianceweighted meta-analysis and performed pre-specified subgroup analyses.
Results:
We included six studies out of 1,707 records, comprising a combined cohort of 5,165,200 patients. All studies used the International Classification of Diseases codes to classify OSA and breast cancer. OSA patients had a 36% increased breast cancer risk (HR, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.80; N = 6, I 2 = 96%) compared to those without OSA. Most studies adjusted for confounders, such as age, sex, obesity, diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, and hypertension. Subgroup analyses for studies with (1) multivariate adjustment and (2) at least five years of follow-up yielded HRs of 1.35 (95% CI, 0.98–1.87; N = 5, I 2 = 96%) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.14–2.18; N = 4; I 2 = 90%), respectively. One Mendelian randomization study suggested a causal relationship, with a two-fold increase in the odds of breast cancer in patients with OSA.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggested that OSA is a risk factor for breast cancer. Future studies should explore the dose-response relationship between OSA and breast cancer, and whether treatment may mitigate breast cancer risk or progression.
2.Clinical efficacy and long-term immunogenicity of an early triple dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in cancer patients.
Matilda Xinwei LEE ; Siyu PENG ; Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin LEE ; Shi Yin WONG ; Ryan Yong Kiat TAY ; Jiaqi LI ; Areeba TARIQ ; Claire Xin Yi GOH ; Ying Kiat TAN ; Benjamin Kye Jyn TAN ; Chong Boon TEO ; Esther CHAN ; Melissa OOI ; Wee Joo CHNG ; Cheng Ean CHEE ; Carol L F HO ; Robert John WALSH ; Maggie WONG ; Yan SU ; Lezhava ALEXANDER ; Sunil Kumar SETHI ; Shaun Shi Yan TAN ; Yiong Huak CHAN ; Kelvin Bryan TAN ; Soo Chin LEE ; Louis Yi Ann CHAI ; Raghav SUNDAR
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2023;52(1):8-16
INTRODUCTION:
Three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been recommended for cancer patients to reduce the risk of severe disease. Anti-neoplastic treatment, such as chemotherapy, may affect long-term vaccine immunogenicity.
METHOD:
Patients with solid or haematological cancer were recruited from 2 hospitals between July 2021 and March 2022. Humoral response was evaluated using GenScript cPASS surrogate virus neutralisation assays. Clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records and national mandatory-reporting databases.
RESULTS:
A total of 273 patients were recruited, with 40 having haematological malignancies and the rest solid tumours. Among the participants, 204 (74.7%) were receiving active cancer therapy, including 98 (35.9%) undergoing systemic chemotherapy and the rest targeted therapy or immunotherapy. All patients were seronegative at baseline. Seroconversion rates after receiving 1, 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were 35.2%, 79.4% and 92.4%, respectively. After 3 doses, patients on active treatment for haematological malignancies had lower antibodies (57.3%±46.2) when compared to patients on immunotherapy (94.1%±9.56, P<0.05) and chemotherapy (92.8%±18.1, P<0.05). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 77 (28.2%) patients, of which 18 were severe. No patient receiving a third dose within 90 days of the second dose experienced severe infection.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates the benefit of early administration of the third dose among cancer patients.
Humans
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
COVID-19/prevention & control*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Hematologic Neoplasms
;
Vaccination
;
RNA, Messenger
;
Antibodies, Viral
;
Immunogenicity, Vaccine