INTRODUCTIONSome studies have demonstrated an increased risk of death for patients admitted at nights or during weekends. This study was undertaken to investigate the demographic profile, medical interventions and outcome of severe head injury patients stratified according to day and time of admission to a specialised neurosciences intensive care unit (NICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODSA retrospective study using a prospectively maintained severe head injury database in a tertiary hospital. Admissions to the NICU were grouped into weekdays, weeknights and weekends. A comparison of patients admitted during the day and night hours were also made.

RESULTSA total of 838 severe head injury patients admitted to NICU were included in the study, of which 263 were admitted on weekdays, 327 on weeknights and 248 on weekends. More patients were admitted during the night (496) compared to during the day (342). There were no significant differences in the demographic profile, mechanism of injury, severity of injury, need for neurosurgical intervention, and duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and mortality associated with day and time of admission. In multivariate analyses controlling for confounding factors, no statistically significant difference in ICU mortality was found with the day and time of admission.

CONCLUSIONSThere were more severe head injury patients admitted to ICU at night and on weekends, with no significant difference in demographic profile, types of injuries, need for neurosurgical interventions and duration of ICU stay and mortality in a specialised NICU with adequate staffing and requisite diagnostic and therapeutic modalities available.

Adult ; Aged ; Craniocerebral Trauma ; mortality ; Female ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Trauma Centers ; standards

Not all cancer cells are born equal. While the great majority of the cells that make up tumours are destined to differentiate, albeit aberrantly, and eventually stop dividing, a handful of cancer cells appear to possess limitless replicative potential. This review presents compelling evidence to suggest that the bulk of malignant cells of most cancers are generated by a rare fraction of stem cell-like cancer cells. These cells, dubbed cancer stem cells, are phenotypically similar to the normal stem cells of the corresponding tissue of origin, but they exhibit dysfunctional patterns of self-renewal and differentiation. Cancer stem cells that are capable of recapitulating brain tumours as xenografts in mice are characterised by defined stem cell markers. These brain tumour stem cells demonstrate enhanced chemoresistance and radioresistance mechanisms compared to non-stem cells in the heterogeneous tumour, which suggest that they may be the likely candidates for tumour progression and recurrence. Indeed, recent work has shown that such aberrant signalling pathways may be targeted in novel anti-cancer therapeutic strategies. The stem cell concept of tumour progression prompts immediate attention to a new paradigm in cancer research with a focus on this minority subset of cells, and the design of novel therapeutic strategies to target these cells that are insignificant within the population of tumour cells, but that are in fact the relevant cells to be destroyed.
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic ; Glioma ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; Humans ; Models, Biological ; Neoplastic Stem Cells ; drug effects ; pathology ; Singapore