1.Effect of residual renal function on quality of life of patients with uremic peritoneal dialysis
Ting LIU ; Yuanping LIU ; Zhenyu NIE ; Beiyan BAO
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2017;24(16):2418-2422
Objective To explore the effect of residual renal function(RRF)on the quality of life in uremia patients with peritoneal dialysis(PD).Methods 64 patients with uremia who underwent PD for 3 months or more were selected.According to the residual glomerular filtration rate(rGFR),the patients were divided into RRF group[35 cases with rGFR≥1mL· min-1·(1.73m2)-1] and non-RRF group[29 cases with rGFR≤1mL· min-1 ·(1.73m2)-1].The patients were followed up at 3-month intervals.The quality of life was assessed using the SF-36.Results The calcium,phosphorus,parathyroid hormone,serum creatinine,C-reactive protein,serum albumin,total urea removal,serum potassium,total urea clearance in the non-RRF group were(2.29±0.25)mmol/L,(1.68±0.42)mmol/L,275.68 ng/L,(1 121.58±215.36)μmol/L,(11.02±14.35)mg/L,(31.01±3.26)g/L,(100±50)mL/d,(3.48±0.78)mmol/L,(1.71±0.28),respectively,which in the RRF group were(2.21±0.19)mmol/L,(1.59±0.35)mmol/L,147.43ng/L,(872.56±264.68)μmol/L,(5.34±8.97)mg/L,(3.43±0.59)mmol/L,(33.21±4.62)g/L,(5.34±8.97)mg/L,(33.21±4.62)g/L,(800±200)mL/d,(3.79±0.59)mmol/L,(2.01±0.41),respectively,the differences between the two groups were significant(t=2.316,2.149,2.353,3.881,2.229,7.213,2.243,2.212,4745,all P<0.05).The total physical health measurement[(48.13±18.32)points and the physiological function[(46.61±21.79)points] in the non-RRF group were significantly lower than those in the RRF group[(56.02±18.12)points,(46.61±21.79)points,t=2.379,2.341,all P<0.05].There was no significant difference between the two groups in the total mental health and SF-36(P>0.05).Univariate linear regression analysis showed that rGFR was not associated with SF-36 overall score.Multivariate linear regression analysis found that SF-36 overall score and serum calcium,phosphorus,parathyroid hormone,serum creatinine,C-reactive protein,peritoneal ultrafiltration volume had relevance(t=4.102,2.412,2.174,4.259).Conclusion There was no significant difference in overall quality of life scores and mental health scores between the RRF group and the non-RRF group.RRF was not directly related to the quality of life of the patients.
2.Clinical efficacy of semaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus combined with non-alco-holic fatty liver disease and its effect on oxidative stress and inflammatory factors
Xiangyu MENG ; Liwei BAI ; Qingfeng YIN ; Beiyan LIU ; Xuehui CHEN ; Yun XU ; Di WANG ; Xu WANG ; Ruina GENG ; Qiujun LIU
Journal of Xinxiang Medical College 2024;41(5):443-448
Objective To explore the efficacy of semaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)com-bined with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)and its effect on oxidative stress and inflammatory factors.Methods Totally 80 patients with T2DM accompanied by NAFLD admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from July 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly assigned to the observation group and the control group,with 40 patients in each group.Patients in the control group were treated with pioglitazone metformin and dapagliflozin,while patients in the observation group were treated with pioglitazone metformin,dapagliflozin,and semaglutide.The levels of glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c),fasting blood glucose(FBG),2-hour postprandial blood glucose(2hPG),body mass,body mass index(BMI),waist circumference,alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),gamma-glutamyl transferase(GGT),controlled attenuation parameter(CAP),liver stiffness measurement(LSM),malondialdehyde(MDA),glutathione peroxidase(GSH-PX),lipid peroxide(LPO),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6),and interleukin-10(IL-10)before and after the treatment were compared.Results After 24 weeks of treatment,the overall response rate(ORR)in the observation group and control group was 92.5%(37/40)and 72.5%(29/40),respectively;and the ORR in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(x2=5.541,P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the body mass,BMI,waist circumference,HbA1c,FBG,2hPG,ALT,AST,GGT,CAP,LSM,MDA,GSH-PX,LPO,TNF-α,IL-6,and IL-10 of patients between the 2 groups(P>0.05);after 24 weeks of treatment,the body mass,BMI,waist circumference,HbA1c,FBG,2hPG,ALT,AST,GGT,CAP,LSM,MDA,LPO,TNF-α,IL-6,and IL-10 were significantly lower than before treatment,while GSH-PX was significantly higher than before treatment(P<0.05);after 24 weeks of treatment,the body mass,BMI,waist circumference,HbA1c,FBG,2hPG,ALT,AST,GGT,CAP,LSM,MDA,LPO,TNF-α,IL-6,and IL-10 of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and GSH-PX was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group and the control group during the treatment period was 17.5%(7/40)and 12.5%(5/40),respectively;and the difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Semaglutide significantly downregulates the levels of FBG,2hPG and HbA1c in patients with T2DM combined with NAFLD and reduces the body mass,waist circumference,liver enzyme level,hepatic fat content,hepatic fibrosis,oxidative stress,and inflammatory indicators.
3.Development of clinical decision support system for insulin titration and validation of its effectiveness and safety
Xiangyu MENG ; Liwei BAI ; Beiyan LIU ; Xuehui CHEN ; Yun XU ; Di WANG ; Xu WANG ; Ruina GENG ; Qiujun LIU
Journal of Xinxiang Medical College 2024;41(6):566-570
Objective To develope a clinical decision support system(CDSS)on insulin titration and validate its effectiveness and safety.Methods Eighty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated at the Department of Endocrinology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from January 2021 to July 2023,who had difficulty in achieving glycemic control on the basis of lifestyle interventions and oral hypoglycemic drug treatments,were selected for the study.The patients were divided into the observation group and the control group using a random number table,with 40 cases in each group.Patients in both groups received oral metformin extended-release tablets,subcutaneous insulin degludec before bedtime,and subcutaneous aspartate insulin injection before three meals for glycemic control.Patients in the observation group were given insulin titration using the CDSS,and patients in the control group were given insulin titration using the conventional method.The retrospective continuous glucose monitoring system was used to monitor time in range(TIR)for glucose,mean amplitude of glycemic excursion(MAGE),mean blood glucose(MBG),standard deviation of blood glucose(SDBG),and the coefficient of variation(CV)of blood glucose.Fasting blood glucose(FBG),2-hour postprandial glucose(2hPG),length of hospitalization,time to achieve standard blood glucose control,and incidence of hypoglycemia of patients were recorded before and after treatment in the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in FBG and 2hPG of patients between the two groups before treat-ment(P>0.05).The FBG and 2hPG levels of patients in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05).The FBG and 2hPG levels of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment(P<0.05).TIR of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,while MAGE,MBG,SDBG,and CV were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment(P<0.05).The length of hospitalization was 9.0(7.3,10.0)days and 11.0(8.3,12.0)days of patients in the observation group and control group,respectively;and the length of hospitalization of patients in the control group was significantly longer than that in the observation group(Z=-2.408,P<0.05).The time required to achieve glycemic control was 6.5(5.0,8.8)days and 7.5(6.0,10.0)days of patients in the observation group and control group,respectively;and the time required to achieve glycemic control of patients in the control group was significantly longer than that in the observation group(Z=-2.019,P<0.05).The incidence of hypoglycemia of patients in the observation group and control group was 20.0%(8/40),12.5%(5/40),respectively;there was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoglycemia between the observation group and the control group(x2=0.827,P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the conventional titration of insulin,the application of CDSS can provide decision support during the implementation of a basal-meal insulin regimen,which can lead to more effective glycemic control,improved glucose TIR,reduced glycemic fluctuations,shorter time required for patients to achieve glycemic control,and shorter hospital stays without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.