Obesity is a complex metabolic disease. Currently, obesity treatment includes lifestyle modification, obesity drug treatment, and bariatric surgery. Lifestyle modification is an essential part of obesity treatment, but it is limited by itself. And anti-obesity treatment drugs also showed limited weight loss effect, about 3-9% per year, and can cause serious side effects such as cardiovascular side events. Surgical treatment requires high cost, permanent resection of the gastrointestinal tract and can cause complication related to surgery. Recently, several promising endoscopic bariatric therapies are emerging. Endoluminal bariatric treatment using flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy could offer a minimally invasive treatment aimed at achieving an effect comparable to obesity surgery, while offering advantages of low cost and safety. In this paper, we described a new technological method, recent clinical data, and the latest findings on obstacles to be overcome for endoscopic gastroplasty using endoscopic suture instruments. Endoscopic gastroplasty presented reduced gastric volume, effective weight loss and maintenance effect without severe adverse events. It could suggest an attractive treatment option for obesity.
Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Gastroplasty* ; Life Style ; Metabolic Diseases ; Methods ; Obesity* ; Sutures ; Weight Loss

Obesity and its associated metabolic diseases including diabetes mellitus are severe medical problems that are increasing in prevalence worldwide and result in significant healthcare expenses. While behavioral and pharmacological treatment approaches are partly effective in the short term, their effects are not long-lasting. Although previous studies have described bariatric surgery as the most effective treatment for obesity, it is associated with morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Endoluminal interventions performed entirely using gastrointestinal flexible endoscopy offer alternative approaches to the treatment of obesity that are safer and more cost-effective than current surgical approaches. The use of endoluminal techniques in the field of metabolic obesity disease has diverse promising applications including endoscopic gastroplasty, intragastric balloon, endoluminal malabsorptive bariatric procedures, and gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for the modulation of gastric emptying. This review discusses recent trends and roles in endoscopic bariatric therapies using the currently available endoluminal and transgastric technologies.
Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Electric Stimulation ; Endoscopy ; Gastric Emptying ; Gastroplasty ; Metabolic Diseases ; Mortality ; Obesity ; Prevalence

Endoscopic bariatric therapies that emulate some of the principles of bariatric surgery have been developed as a less invasive option for the treatment of obesity and related comorbidities. Small bowel endoscopic bariatric therapies include bypass sleeves, incisionless anastomosis systems, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. Clinical experience with small bowel devices suggests that endoscopic bariatric procedures can be safely implemented and that these devices are effective for both weight loss and metabolic improvement. Although the mechanisms behind these effects should be further elucidated, endoscopic bariatric therapies may be more effective and safer adjunctive interventions than lifestyle modifications and pharmacological regimens for patients with obesity or obesity-related comorbidities.
Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Comorbidity ; Endoscopy ; Humans ; Intestine, Small ; Life Style ; Obesity ; Weight Loss

Obesity is a complex metabolic disease caused by excess body fat, which can be associated with many health problems. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. However, only small number of patients undergo surgery despite definite benefits. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with flexible device is an essential tool in the evaluation of post bariatric surgery patient. It plays an important role in treating complications occurring after bariatric surgery. Recently, there has been active research and development on endoscopic procedures to achieve similar effects with bariatric surgery in less invasive ways. Endoluminal interventions performed using flexible endoscopy might be less effective than current surgical approaches, but it can offer alternative approaches to the treatment of obesity that are safer and more cost-effective. This article provides an overview of endoscopic procedures for postoperative complication and new emerging endoscopic techniques for primary endoscopic bariatric therapies. Knowing the type, indication, expected effect, and development potential of endoscopic procedures might be of great help to surgeons performing bariatric procedures.
Adipose Tissue ; Bariatric Surgery ; Bariatrics ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Humans ; Metabolic Diseases ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid ; Postoperative Complications ; Surgeons

Obesity is a chronic disease with an exponentially increasing incidence rate, and its negative effects are well documented in numerous studies. As a result, the importance of bariatric therapy cannot be overemphasized, and many bariatric treatment methods with varying mechanisms have been developed. Of the available treatment methods, intragastric balloons, introduced in the 1980s, have been shown to be a safe and effective treatment modality; various intragastric balloon products have been developed and are currently being widely used in clinical settings. However, the disadvantages of intragastric balloons, such as unclear long-term weight loss benefits and complications experienced during insertion and removal, preclude their wider use. In this review, we discuss different intragastric balloon products, focusing on those under clinical investigation, and suggest future research directions.
Bariatrics ; Chronic Disease ; Endoscopy ; Incidence ; Obesity ; Weight Loss

Bariatric surgery is an effective way to achieve long-term weight reduction in severely obese patients. This article illuminates the indications, procedures, complications, and results of bariatric surgery for severe obesity.
Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; Gastric Bypass ; methods ; Gastroplasty ; methods ; Humans ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery

Body Mass Index ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastroplasty ; Humans ; Laparoscopy

The emerging endoscopic technologies are proved to be effective treatments for obesity in selected patients and to offer the potential advantages of reduced invasiveness, reversibility and repeatability. From the view of operation principle, endoscopic technologies can be classified as restrictive procedure, malabsorption procedure and endoscopic revision of gastric bypass. Restrictive procedures include intragastric balloon, aspiration therapy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and transoral gastroplasty. Intragastric balloon employs space occupying, volume restriction and satiety mechanisms, which is superior to drugs and lifestyle change, but shorter than sleeve and bypass surgery. Aspiration therapy is similar to standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, while there are no available data regarding the obesity and metabolic improvement. Compared with traditional bariatric surgery, ESG does not excise gastric tissue with less complications and without weight regain, but it can not be used as an independent operation still now. Transoral gastroplasty is rarely applied clinically whose efficacy and long-term complications need further studies. Malabsorption surgery includes endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass sleeve (EDJBS) and endoscopic gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve(EGDJBS). EDJBS may have the similar mechanism like bypass reducing the blood glucose. Even with obvious effect of weight loss, EDJBS has high morbidity of complications and requirements of the skilled operators. EGDJBS, which imitates bypass anatomy changes and belongs to the mixed operation, should be superior to the above procedures in reducing weight theoretically, but due to the lack of clinical data, its short-term and long-term efficacy still need further clinical observation. As compared to the complexity and risks associated with telescopic surgical revision, endoscopic suturing has been confirmed as less invasive and safer for stomal revisions, while its long-term efficacy of reducing weight and improvement of diabetes are not yet clear. Even if long-term efficacy of reducing weight and morbidity of complication in endoscopic bariatric surgery are still indefinite, and clinical trial researches of large sample and long-term follow-up are absent, with the development of endoscopic skill and the gradual clinical application, endoscopic bariatric surgery will provide a new option for the patients of obesity and metabolic diseases.
Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Disease Management ; Endoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Balloon ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastroplasty ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Metabolic Diseases ; surgery ; Obesity ; surgery ; Reoperation ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Surgical Stomas ; pathology ; statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

Along with the soaring prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) globally, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been rapidly developing into a major surgical subspecialty. However, the indications, benefits and potential risks of MBS are still controversial so far. In September 2015, the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit (DSS-II() was successfully convened, and later on an international joint statement on metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for T2DM was released based upon the consensus reached in DSS-II(, aiming to serve as a new global clinical guideline. The DSS-II( joint statement was initiated and endorsed by 5 leading international diabetes organizations, including American Diabetes Association (ADA), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS), Diabetes India, as well as Diabetes UK, and was developed by an expert committee comprised of 48 international authorities as voting delegates. Up to the date of publication, the DSS-II( statement has been officially endorsed by 45 international professional associations/societies, including 30 non-surgical and 15 surgical organizations. In this statement, the following six aspects were recommended to differentiate MBS from traditional bariatric surgery: 1)The primary goal of MBS is to treat T2DM and to reduce the risk of T2DM complications; 2) In addition to a 50% or more of excess weight loss and normalization of glycemia, outcomes of diabetes complications should also be considered as clinical endpoints of MBS; 3) For patient selection, body mass index (BMI), T2DM treatment, as well as long-term risks versus benefits, including its effects on cardiovascular events (CVD), should all be considered; 4) T2DM and its complications, as well as pancreatic function reserve should be assessed pre-operatively; 5) Major surgical options include laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), and bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS). BPD-DS has the best outcome in T2DM remission followed by LRYGB, LSG and LAGB; 6) Glycemic variation should be intensively monitored, and if needed, managed following surgery. Clinical follow-up should be conducted at least once every six months within two years after surgery. For patients achieving complete remission from T2DM, diabetes complications should still be monitored within five years after surgery with the same frequency and protocols as pre-operatively.
Aftercare ; standards ; Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; standards ; Biliopancreatic Diversion ; Blood Glucose ; physiology ; Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Disease Management ; Gastrectomy ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastroplasty ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity ; surgery ; Patient Care Planning ; standards ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; standards ; Remission Induction ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a popular bariatric procedure, few comprehensive studies have been investigated on the use of non-gastro-gastric sutures (NGGSs) for decreasing postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the safety and effectiveness of MIDBAND with or without gastro-gastric sutures (GGSs). METHODS: Between February 2013 and March 2014, 41 severely obese patients underwent primary LAGB using pars flaccid technique at double center in South Korea. Excess weight loss, operative time and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between a GGS group (group 1) and a NGGS group (group 2), and patients were followed monthly for 1 year. RESULTS: Mean body mass indices in groups 1 and 2 were 38.4 ± 4.7 and 38.9 ± 5.0 kg/m², respectively, and mean percentage excess weight losses (%EWLs) were 59.9% ± 28.4% and 50.9% ± 20.0%, respectively, at 6 months, and 75.8% ± 26.6% and 72.5% ± 27.5%, respectively, at 12 months, and these intergroup differences of %EWL were not significant (P = 0.256 and P = 0.704, respectively). Mean operative time (57.2 minutes) was shorter in group 2 than in group 1 (79.2 minutes) (P < 0.001). In terms of complications, pouch dilatation rates were similar in the 2 groups, and no case of gastric band erosion was encountered. CONCLUSION: Operative time was shorter in the NGGS group, and pouch dilatation rates and %EWL were similar in the 2 groups. We conclude NGGS using MIDBAND is both straightforward and effective. A long-term prospective comparative study is needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of NGGS.
Bariatric Surgery ; Dilatation ; Gastroplasty ; Humans ; Korea ; Laparoscopy ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies* ; Sutures* ; Weight Loss