Objective:To assess the accuracy and practicability of HaiMed refractory wound artificial intelligence assisted system in wound measurement.Methods:Twenty patients with chronic wounds who were diagnosed and treated from January 2019 to August 2019 in the Plastic Surgery Department of Peking University Third Hospital, including 12 males and 8 females, aged 20-76 years old. The cases included 9 poorly healed wounds, 6 diabetic foot wounds, 4 cases of pressure sores, and 1 case of tumor wounds. The traditional transparent film method and HaiMed system were used to measure the wound area of 20 cases. A paired t-test was performed on the measurement result of the two groups of wound area, and the accuracy and stability of the HaiMed system were statistically analyzed by Spearman simple correlation analysis, Bland-Altman evaluation and coefficient of variation. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. Results:Compared with traditional measurement tools, HaiMed system had no statistically significant difference in wound area measurement ( t=1.997, P=0.060). The Spearman correlation coefficient ( r=0.998) of the two method was consistent. Bland-Altman’s evaluation showed that all scattered points fell within the 95% consistency limit, and the HaiMed system was accurate and reliable. The minimum coefficient of variation of the transparent film hem method group was 0.41%, the maximum was 4.03%, and the average was 1.67%; the coefficient of variation of the HaiMed group was minimum 0.15%, the maximum was 2.31%, and the average was 0.60%. The two had good consistency, and the HaiMed system had higher stability than traditional measurement method. Conclusions:HaiMed system measures the wound area with high accuracy and good stability, especially for superficial wounds. It can be easily and quickly evaluated. HaiMed system is a new and reliable wound measurement tool.

Objective:To assess the accuracy and practicability of HaiMed refractory wound artificial intelligence assisted system in wound measurement.Methods:Twenty patients with chronic wounds who were diagnosed and treated from January 2019 to August 2019 in the Plastic Surgery Department of Peking University Third Hospital, including 12 males and 8 females, aged 20-76 years old. The cases included 9 poorly healed wounds, 6 diabetic foot wounds, 4 cases of pressure sores, and 1 case of tumor wounds. The traditional transparent film method and HaiMed system were used to measure the wound area of 20 cases. A paired t-test was performed on the measurement result of the two groups of wound area, and the accuracy and stability of the HaiMed system were statistically analyzed by Spearman simple correlation analysis, Bland-Altman evaluation and coefficient of variation. P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant. Results:Compared with traditional measurement tools, HaiMed system had no statistically significant difference in wound area measurement ( t=1.997, P=0.060). The Spearman correlation coefficient ( r=0.998) of the two method was consistent. Bland-Altman’s evaluation showed that all scattered points fell within the 95% consistency limit, and the HaiMed system was accurate and reliable. The minimum coefficient of variation of the transparent film hem method group was 0.41%, the maximum was 4.03%, and the average was 1.67%; the coefficient of variation of the HaiMed group was minimum 0.15%, the maximum was 2.31%, and the average was 0.60%. The two had good consistency, and the HaiMed system had higher stability than traditional measurement method. Conclusions:HaiMed system measures the wound area with high accuracy and good stability, especially for superficial wounds. It can be easily and quickly evaluated. HaiMed system is a new and reliable wound measurement tool.