1.Current Status and Future of Robotic Pancreatic Surgery
Bangbo ZHAO ; Weibin WANG ; Yupei ZHAO
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2024;15(4):729-733
Pancreatic surgery is characterized by great trauma, difficult operation, high risk and high complication rate. Minimally invasive, refined and standardized pancreatic surgery is the future trend. With its advantages of high precision, high safety, and more realistic and clear operating field, robotic pancreatic surgery has gradually become the preferred method of pancreatic surgery worldwide. In the past 10 years, more than a dozen large pancreas centers in China have matured to carry out robotic pancreatic surgery, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticocaudectomy, pancreatic tumor enucleation, middle pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, pancreaticodectomy with duodenum preserved and other pancreatic surgery methods. However, there are still some problems in robotic pancreatic surgery, such as complex system construction, lack of force feedback, inadequate imaging fusion, and immature remote operation. Pancreatic surgeons should continue to carry out high-quality clinical studies on robotic pancreatic surgery to verify its safety and effectiveness, and standardize robotic pancreatic surgery with the accumulation of experience.
2.Surgical Efficacy and Quality of Life of Total Pancreatectomy versus Pancreatico- duodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Propensity Score Matching
Tianyu LI ; Bangbo ZHAO ; Zeru LI ; Yutong ZHAO ; Xianlin HAN ; Taiping ZHANG ; Menghua DAI ; Junchao GUO ; Weibin WANG
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2024;15(4):807-818
To investigate the differences in postoperative short-term complications and long-term prognosis of pancreatic cancer(PC) patients after total pancreatectomy(TP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD). Clinical data of PC patients who underwent TP from January 2016 to December 2021(TP group) and PD from January 2019 to December 2021(PD group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively collected. Patients in the PD group were divided into the pancreatic fistula(PF) high-risk PD group and the recurrence high-risk PD group according to risk factors. After propensity score matching, the differences in postoperative short-term surgical efficacy indicators(postoperative complication rate, 30 d mortality rate, length of hospital stay, etc.), long-term surgical efficacy indicators(overall survival), and quality of life were compared between the TP group and the PF high-risk PD group or the recurrence high-risk PD group. A total of 32 patients in the TP group and 114 patients in the PD group(99 patients in the PF high-risk PD group and 15 patients in the recurrence high-risk PD group) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled.(1)TP group and PF high-risk PD group: after propensity score matching, 29 patients in the TP group and 56 patients in the PF high-risk PD group were finally included. There was no PF in the TP group, and the rate of PF in the PF high-risk PD group was 19.64%( For PC patients at high risk of PF, TP can achieve short-term surgical outcomes and long-term quality of life comparable to PD with no burden of postoperative pancreatic fistula. For patients with high-risk recurrence, TP can significantly prolong the survival of PC patients while ensuring surgical safety.