Objectives: In Indonesia, the poor prognosis and high hospital readmission rates of patients with heart failure (HF) have yet to receive focused attention. However, machine learning (ML) approaches can help to mitigate these problems. We aimed to determine which ML models best predicted HF severity and hospital readmissions and could be used in a patient self-monitoring mobile application. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we collected the data of patients admitted with HF to the Siloam Diagram Heart Center in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data was analyzed using the Orange data mining classification method. ML support algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, gradient boosting, Naïve Bayes, tree-based models, and logistic regression were used to predict HF severity and hospital readmissions. The performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1-scores. Results: Of the 543 patients with HF, 3 (0.56%) were excluded due to death on admission. Hospital readmission occurred in 138 patients (25.6%). Of the six algorithms tested, ANN showed the best performance in predicting both HF severity (AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 0.998, F1-score = 0.998) and readmission for HF (AUC = 0.998, accuracy = 0.975, F1-score = 0.972). Other studies have shown variable results for the best algorithm to predict hospital readmission in patients with HF. Conclusions The ANN algorithm performed best in predicting HF severity and hospital readmissions and will be integrated into a mobile application for patient self-monitoring to prevent readmissions.

Objectives: In Indonesia, the poor prognosis and high hospital readmission rates of patients with heart failure (HF) have yet to receive focused attention. However, machine learning (ML) approaches can help to mitigate these problems. We aimed to determine which ML models best predicted HF severity and hospital readmissions and could be used in a patient self-monitoring mobile application. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we collected the data of patients admitted with HF to the Siloam Diagram Heart Center in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data was analyzed using the Orange data mining classification method. ML support algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, gradient boosting, Naïve Bayes, tree-based models, and logistic regression were used to predict HF severity and hospital readmissions. The performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1-scores. Results: Of the 543 patients with HF, 3 (0.56%) were excluded due to death on admission. Hospital readmission occurred in 138 patients (25.6%). Of the six algorithms tested, ANN showed the best performance in predicting both HF severity (AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 0.998, F1-score = 0.998) and readmission for HF (AUC = 0.998, accuracy = 0.975, F1-score = 0.972). Other studies have shown variable results for the best algorithm to predict hospital readmission in patients with HF. Conclusions The ANN algorithm performed best in predicting HF severity and hospital readmissions and will be integrated into a mobile application for patient self-monitoring to prevent readmissions.

Objectives: In Indonesia, the poor prognosis and high hospital readmission rates of patients with heart failure (HF) have yet to receive focused attention. However, machine learning (ML) approaches can help to mitigate these problems. We aimed to determine which ML models best predicted HF severity and hospital readmissions and could be used in a patient self-monitoring mobile application. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we collected the data of patients admitted with HF to the Siloam Diagram Heart Center in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data was analyzed using the Orange data mining classification method. ML support algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, gradient boosting, Naïve Bayes, tree-based models, and logistic regression were used to predict HF severity and hospital readmissions. The performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1-scores. Results: Of the 543 patients with HF, 3 (0.56%) were excluded due to death on admission. Hospital readmission occurred in 138 patients (25.6%). Of the six algorithms tested, ANN showed the best performance in predicting both HF severity (AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 0.998, F1-score = 0.998) and readmission for HF (AUC = 0.998, accuracy = 0.975, F1-score = 0.972). Other studies have shown variable results for the best algorithm to predict hospital readmission in patients with HF. Conclusions The ANN algorithm performed best in predicting HF severity and hospital readmissions and will be integrated into a mobile application for patient self-monitoring to prevent readmissions.

Objectives: In Indonesia, the poor prognosis and high hospital readmission rates of patients with heart failure (HF) have yet to receive focused attention. However, machine learning (ML) approaches can help to mitigate these problems. We aimed to determine which ML models best predicted HF severity and hospital readmissions and could be used in a patient self-monitoring mobile application. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we collected the data of patients admitted with HF to the Siloam Diagram Heart Center in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data was analyzed using the Orange data mining classification method. ML support algorithms, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, gradient boosting, Naïve Bayes, tree-based models, and logistic regression were used to predict HF severity and hospital readmissions. The performance of these models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1-scores. Results: Of the 543 patients with HF, 3 (0.56%) were excluded due to death on admission. Hospital readmission occurred in 138 patients (25.6%). Of the six algorithms tested, ANN showed the best performance in predicting both HF severity (AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 0.998, F1-score = 0.998) and readmission for HF (AUC = 0.998, accuracy = 0.975, F1-score = 0.972). Other studies have shown variable results for the best algorithm to predict hospital readmission in patients with HF. Conclusions The ANN algorithm performed best in predicting HF severity and hospital readmissions and will be integrated into a mobile application for patient self-monitoring to prevent readmissions.

Background and Objective: Premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden exhibits one of three circadian types, classified as fast-type, slow-type, and independent-type PVC. It is unknown whether PVC circadian types have different heart rate variability (HRV) parameter values. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate differences in HRV circadian rhythm among fast-, slow-, and independent-type PVC. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study consecutively recruited 65 idiopathic PVC subjects (23 fast-, 20 slow-, and 22 independent-type) as well as five control subjects. Each subject underwent a 24-hour Holter to examine PVC burden and HRV. HRV analysis included components that primarily reflect global, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activities. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare differences in HRV circadian rhythm by PVC type. Results. The average PVC burden was 15.7%, 8.4%, and 13.6% in fast-, slow-, and independent-type idiopathic PVC subjects, respectively. Global, parasympathetic nervous system, and sympathetic nervous system HRV parameters were significantly lower in independenttype PVC versus fast- and slow-type PVC throughout the day and night. Furthermore, we unexpectedly found that tendency towards sympathetic activity dominance during nighttime was only in independent-type PVC. Conclusion The HRV parameters are reduced in patients with independent-type PVC compared to fast- and slowtype PVC. Future research is warranted to determine possible differences in the prognosis between the three PVC types.
Ventricular Premature Complexes ; Circadian Rhythm ; Autonomic Nervous System