The concomitant occurrence of acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but challenging condition. Although anticoagulation therapy is essential in the treatment of PE, it may increase the risk of aortic rupture and bleeding complications. We herein describe a patient with acute TBAD complicated by PE, which was successfully treated with early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) followed by anticoagulation. The present case report demonstrates that early TEVAR not only treats the aortic pathology but also allows the safe initiation of anticoagulation therapy.

The radial artery is currently the main vascular access site for cardiac catheterization. Radial artery occlusion (RAO), although a relatively silent complication, raises concerns because of its potential impact on future procedures. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulation regimens—subcutaneous enoxaparin and oral rivaroxaban—in resolving symptomatic ultrasound-confirmed RAO in 40 patients (median age 55 years [interquartile range, 48-64], including 26 female patients [70.3%]) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization without requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Thirty-seven patients completed the 28-day ultrasound-based follow-up, demonstrating comparable complete or partial resolution rates between rivaroxaban (16 of 20 patients [80.0%]) and enoxaparin (14 of 17 patients [82.3%]), with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 4.50). No major bleeding events occurred during the 28-day follow-up period. While rivaroxaban shows potential in resolving RAO, larger studies are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes.

The radial artery is currently the main vascular access site for cardiac catheterization. Radial artery occlusion (RAO), although a relatively silent complication, raises concerns because of its potential impact on future procedures. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulation regimens—subcutaneous enoxaparin and oral rivaroxaban—in resolving symptomatic ultrasound-confirmed RAO in 40 patients (median age 55 years [interquartile range, 48-64], including 26 female patients [70.3%]) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization without requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Thirty-seven patients completed the 28-day ultrasound-based follow-up, demonstrating comparable complete or partial resolution rates between rivaroxaban (16 of 20 patients [80.0%]) and enoxaparin (14 of 17 patients [82.3%]), with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 4.50). No major bleeding events occurred during the 28-day follow-up period. While rivaroxaban shows potential in resolving RAO, larger studies are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes.

The radial artery is currently the main vascular access site for cardiac catheterization. Radial artery occlusion (RAO), although a relatively silent complication, raises concerns because of its potential impact on future procedures. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulation regimens—subcutaneous enoxaparin and oral rivaroxaban—in resolving symptomatic ultrasound-confirmed RAO in 40 patients (median age 55 years [interquartile range, 48-64], including 26 female patients [70.3%]) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization without requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Thirty-seven patients completed the 28-day ultrasound-based follow-up, demonstrating comparable complete or partial resolution rates between rivaroxaban (16 of 20 patients [80.0%]) and enoxaparin (14 of 17 patients [82.3%]), with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 4.50). No major bleeding events occurred during the 28-day follow-up period. While rivaroxaban shows potential in resolving RAO, larger studies are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes.

The radial artery is currently the main vascular access site for cardiac catheterization. Radial artery occlusion (RAO), although a relatively silent complication, raises concerns because of its potential impact on future procedures. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulation regimens—subcutaneous enoxaparin and oral rivaroxaban—in resolving symptomatic ultrasound-confirmed RAO in 40 patients (median age 55 years [interquartile range, 48-64], including 26 female patients [70.3%]) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization without requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Thirty-seven patients completed the 28-day ultrasound-based follow-up, demonstrating comparable complete or partial resolution rates between rivaroxaban (16 of 20 patients [80.0%]) and enoxaparin (14 of 17 patients [82.3%]), with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 4.50). No major bleeding events occurred during the 28-day follow-up period. While rivaroxaban shows potential in resolving RAO, larger studies are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes.

The radial artery is currently the main vascular access site for cardiac catheterization. Radial artery occlusion (RAO), although a relatively silent complication, raises concerns because of its potential impact on future procedures. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulation regimens—subcutaneous enoxaparin and oral rivaroxaban—in resolving symptomatic ultrasound-confirmed RAO in 40 patients (median age 55 years [interquartile range, 48-64], including 26 female patients [70.3%]) who underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization without requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Thirty-seven patients completed the 28-day ultrasound-based follow-up, demonstrating comparable complete or partial resolution rates between rivaroxaban (16 of 20 patients [80.0%]) and enoxaparin (14 of 17 patients [82.3%]), with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 4.50). No major bleeding events occurred during the 28-day follow-up period. While rivaroxaban shows potential in resolving RAO, larger studies are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes.