1.Clinical diagnosis of BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients.
Gang HUANG ; Li-Zhong CHEN ; Chang-Xi WANG ; Ji-Guang FEI ; Jiang QIU ; Jun LI ; Su-Xiong DENG ; Guo-Dong CHEN ; Wen-Tao ZENG ; Qian FU ; Yu-Lian JI
Journal of Southern Medical University 2007;27(10):1593-1596
OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical diagnosis of BK virus (BKV) infection in renal transplant recipients.
METHODSUrine and peripheral blood samples were taken from 234 renal transplant recipients for BKV detection with cytological test and real-time PCR.
RESULTSThe occurrence rate of urine decoy cells, BKV viruria and viremia in these patients was 33.3 %, 33.3% and 16.2%, respectively, and the median level of urine decoy cells was 6/10 HPF, with the median level of urine and peripheral blood BKV of 7.62 x 10(3) copy/ml and 7.61 x 10(3) copy/ml, respectively. The positivity rate of BKV in the urine samples were significantly higher than that in peripheral blood samples (P=0.000). The amount of decoy cells was related to BKV load in the urine samples (gamma=0.59, P=0.000), but the BKV load in the urine samples was not related to that in peripheral blood samples (P=0.14).
CONCLUSIONRenal transplantation is associated with increased BKV shedding, indicating the necessity of BKV monitoring in renal transplant recipients with urine cytology, which is convenient and sensitive and indicates renal histological changes indirectly. Urine and peripheral blood BKV DNA detection is of value in identifying BKV activation to prevent irreversible graft damage of BKV-associated nephropathy.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; BK Virus ; genetics ; isolation & purification ; physiology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polyomavirus Infections ; diagnosis ; virology ; Young Adult
2.Detection of BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients and clinical application.
Zhong-biao WU ; Guo-bing LIN ; Ai-ping ZENG ; Zhen-qian CHEN ; Jun CHEN ; Min-qiao ZHENG ; Guo-wei TU ; Rui-ming RONG
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology 2010;24(5):367-369
OBJECTIVETo study the detection methods of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients, and to explore the clinical application.
METHODS132 cases of renal transplant recipients were undertaken BK virus detection including presence of decoy cells in urinary sediment, urine and serum BKV-DNA to demonstrate the BK virus replication.
RESULTAmong 132 cases of renal transplant recipients, urinary decoy cell was found in 37 (28.0%) patients and the median time was 12 months after surgery. 32 (24.2%) patients were diagnosed as BK viruria at a median of 11 months after surgery, and 16 (12.1%) recipients were diagnosed as BK viremia at a median of 15 months after surgery, 5 patients with BK viruria were diagnosed as BK virus associated nephropathy according to allograft biopsy.
CONCLUSIONTo make early diagnosis of BK virus infection, detection of urine decoy cells and BKV-DNA in urine and plasma sample is important,which provides an important basis for the prevention of BK virus associated nephropathy.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; BK Virus ; genetics ; isolation & purification ; physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney ; virology ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polyomavirus Infections ; diagnosis ; virology ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; virology ; Tumor Virus Infections ; diagnosis ; virology ; Virus Replication ; Young Adult
3.Quantitation of BK Virus DNA for Diagnosis of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients.
Heungsup SUNG ; Byung Hoo CHOI ; Yeon Jung PYO ; Mi Na KIM ; Duck Jong HAN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2008;23(5):814-818
Quantitative measurement of BK virus DNA (Q-BKDNA) has been used for the early diagnosis and monitoring of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). This study was designed to determine the BKDNA cutoff for the diagnosis of BKVAN. Between June 2005 and February 2007, 64 renal transplant recipients taken renal biopsies due to renal impairment submitted plasma and urine for Q-BKDNA. Eight BKVAN patients (12.5%) had median viral loads of 6.0 log(10) copies/mL in plasma and 7.3 log(10) copies/mL in urine. Among 56 non-BKVAN patients, 45 were negative for Q-BKDNA; 4 were positive in plasma with a median viral load of 4.8 log(10) copies/ mL, and 10 were positive in urine with a median viral load of 4.8 log(10) copies/mL. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a cutoff of 4.5 log(10) copies/mL in plasma and a cutoff of 5.9 log(10) copies/mL in urine had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.4%, respectively. A combined cutoffs of 4 log(10) copies/ mL in plasma and 6 log(10) copies/mL in urine had better performance with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.2% than each cutoff of urine or plasma. QBKDNA with the combined cutoffs could reliably diagnose BKVAN in renal transplant recipients.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
BK Virus/*genetics
;
Biopsy
;
Calibration
;
DNA, Viral/*genetics
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kidney Diseases/*virology
;
Kidney Transplantation/*methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis
;
Treatment Outcome