1.Growth inhibition effect of 5-azaC on the proliferation of HSG cells in vivo
Zhongcheng BAI ; Zhenqiang SITU ; Lili LI ; Bin LIU ; Shenggen SHI
Journal of Practical Stomatology 2000;0(06):-
objective:To study the growth inhibition effect of 5azaC on human salivary gland cell line HSG. Methods:HSG cells were exposed to 5-azaC at 5?10~ -6 mol/L and 10?10~ -6 mol/L respectively for 3 days. The proliferation of in vitro cultured HSG cells was studied by cell counting. The in vivo growth of HSG cells was investigated by tumor weight measurement in nude mouse models of HSG tumor induced by transplantation of the cells subcutaneously.Results:5 azaC inhibited HSG cell proliferation by 85% and 95% respectively at above mentioned doses. In the 3-week tumor growth study, the growth of the tumor induced by 5?10~ -6 mol/L 5azaC treated cell was inhibited by 74.8%.Conclusion:5azaC can inhibit the growth of HSG cells in vitro and in vivo.
2.FDG-positron emission tomography and EEG:The comparison in localizing in refractory epilepsy
Jun-sheng CHU ; Bin ZHANG ; Qin BAI ; Ruixue CUI ; Zhongcheng WANG
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 2004;10(1):59-60
ObjectiveTo study the values of EEG and [18F]2-deoxyglucose(FDG) positron emission tomography in localizing the epiletogenic cortex,and evaluate their relation.MethodsVideo-EEG(VEEG) and FDG-PET scans were performed in 44 patients with refractory epilepsy.Electrocorticography(ECoG) in surgery and patholopy were performed in 38 patients who had undergone neurosurgical therapy.Congruence among them were studied.Results43 patients(98%) had FDG-PET hypometabolism.42 patients(95%) had epileptiform wave.There were 22 patients(50%) whose PET and EEG were in complete congruence,whereas 10 patients(23%) in part congruence.12 patients who had undergone operation had controversial results in PET and EEG,8 cases had agreement between ECoG and PET,and 2 cases had agreement between ECoG and VEEG. ConclusionFDG-PET is a effective,sensitive and non-invasive investigation.It can provide valuable supplemental data in patients with unlocalized surface EEG.
3.Study of mandibular buccal gingival mucosa pain sensitivity
BAI Zhongcheng ; WANG Yayu ; LI Xiaoling ; LI Xiaoning ; NIU Zhongying
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2020;28(10):646-650
Objective:
Through a pain study of buccal gingival mucosa sensitivity of the mandible, the corresponding sensitive area of pain was determined, which provided the basis for reducing the pain and discomfort of oral diagnosis and treatment.
Methods:
400 patients with mandibular tooth extraction in the outpatient department of stomatology were selected. During tooth extraction, articaine epinephrine injection was used for infiltration anesthesia. The injection needle size was 0.3 mm × 21 mm, and the injection site was about 5 mm away from the buccal gingival margin. The pain degree of the patients was recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using the modified International pain classification method.
Results :
Among the 400 patients who underwent mandible extraction, 75% (300 patients) graded their pain from painless to moderate, and 25% (100 patients) reported moderate to severe and severe pain. Of those in the moderate to severe and severe groups, 50% and 42% reported pain in the central and lateral incisors, respectively, and 38% were in the canine group. When comparing the moderate to severe and the severe groups, 16% and 10% were in the bicuspid group, 16% and 12% and 16% were in the molar group, respectively . There were significant differences in the pain sensitivity of different teeth positions (χ2=54.203, P < 0.001). The proportion of moderate to severe and severe pain in the anterior teeth group was higher than it was in the posterior teeth group (χ2=55.555, P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the pain sensitivity of different ages (χ2=96.501, P=0.000), and there was a positive correlation between pain and age (r=0.465, P < 0.001). The proportion of women with at least a moderate degree of pain was higher than that of men (χ2=12.298, P=0.031).
Conclusion
The sensitivity of the buccal gingival mucosa to pain is different in different positions of the mandible. The sensitivity of the anterior gingiva is higher than that of the posterior gingiva. Age is positively correlated with the degree of pain. Further, compared with men, women are more sensitive to pain.