1.Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Using a Surgical Microscope.
Motoi KATO ; Azusa WATANABE ; Shoji WATANABE ; Hiroki UTSUNOMIYA ; Takayuki YOKOYAMA ; Shinya OGISHIMA
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(6):490-495
BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate repair requires a deep and small surgical field and is usually performed by surgeons wearing surgical loupes. Surgeons with loupes can obtain a wider surgical view, although headlights are required for the deepest procedures. Surgical microscopes offer comfort and a clear and magnification-adjustable surgical site that can be shared with the whole team, including observers, and easily recorded to further the education of junior surgeons. Magnification adjustments are convenient for precise procedures such as muscle dissection of the soft palate. METHODS: We performed a comparative investigation of 18 cleft operations that utilized either surgical loupes or microscopy. Paper-based questionnaires were completed by staff nurses to evaluate what went well and what could be improved in each procedure. The operating time, complication rate, and scores of the questionnaire responses were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The operating time when microscopy was used was not significantly longer than when surgical loupes were utilized. The surgical field was clearly shared with surgical assistants, nurses, anesthesiologists, and students via microscope-linked monitors. Passing surgical equipment was easier when sharing the surgical view, and preoperative microscope preparation did not interfere with the duties of the staff nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical microscopy was demonstrated to be useful during cleft operations.
Cleft Lip*
;
Cleft Palate
;
Education
;
Humans
;
Microscopy
;
Palate*
;
Palate, Soft
;
Surgeons
;
Surgical Equipment
2.Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Using a Surgical Microscope.
Motoi KATO ; Azusa WATANABE ; Shoji WATANABE ; Hiroki UTSUNOMIYA ; Takayuki YOKOYAMA ; Shinya OGISHIMA
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(6):490-495
BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate repair requires a deep and small surgical field and is usually performed by surgeons wearing surgical loupes. Surgeons with loupes can obtain a wider surgical view, although headlights are required for the deepest procedures. Surgical microscopes offer comfort and a clear and magnification-adjustable surgical site that can be shared with the whole team, including observers, and easily recorded to further the education of junior surgeons. Magnification adjustments are convenient for precise procedures such as muscle dissection of the soft palate. METHODS: We performed a comparative investigation of 18 cleft operations that utilized either surgical loupes or microscopy. Paper-based questionnaires were completed by staff nurses to evaluate what went well and what could be improved in each procedure. The operating time, complication rate, and scores of the questionnaire responses were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The operating time when microscopy was used was not significantly longer than when surgical loupes were utilized. The surgical field was clearly shared with surgical assistants, nurses, anesthesiologists, and students via microscope-linked monitors. Passing surgical equipment was easier when sharing the surgical view, and preoperative microscope preparation did not interfere with the duties of the staff nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical microscopy was demonstrated to be useful during cleft operations.
Cleft Lip*
;
Cleft Palate
;
Education
;
Humans
;
Microscopy
;
Palate*
;
Palate, Soft
;
Surgeons
;
Surgical Equipment
3.Assessment of the Latent Adverse Events of Antipsychotic Treatment Using a Subjective Questionnaire in Japanese Patients with Schizophrenia.
Masakazu HATANO ; Hiroyuki KAMEI ; Azusa KATO ; Ippei TAKEUCHI ; Manako HANYA ; Junji UNO ; Shigeki YAMADA ; Kiyoshi FUJITA ; Nakao IWATA
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2017;15(2):132-137
OBJECTIVE: The adverse effects of antipsychotic agents can have a marked influence on medication adherence. In this study, we investigated the adverse events of antipsychotics that are less likely to be reported by patients and the reasons why such symptoms remain latent. METHODS: Data were collected by interviewing patients using a subjective questionnaire, and the associations between unreported symptoms and background factors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were examined. Their major symptoms were daytime sleepiness (50.0%), weight gain (42.2%), and sexual dysfunction (38.9%). Sexual dysfunction was nominal significantly more common among the patients that had been treated with antipsychotic agent polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 to 4.30), and was nominal significantly more common among outpatients (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.13). Only approximately 30% of the patients had reported their symptoms to their physicians. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving antipsychotic treatment tolerate some symptoms and do not feel able to report them to their physicians. The most common reason for this is an insufficient patient-physician relationship. Sexual dysfunction is especially hard to identify because it is a delicate problem, and our findings demonstrate that subjective questionnaires are helpful for detecting such symptoms.
Antipsychotic Agents
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
;
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
;
Humans
;
Medication Adherence
;
Outpatients
;
Polypharmacy
;
Psychotic Disorders
;
Schizophrenia*
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Weight Gain