1.Acute Effect of Low and High Glycemic Index Meals on Post-prandial Glycemia and Insulin Responses with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
MY Barakatun Nisak ; AT Ruzita ; AK Norimah ; K Nor Azmi ; A Fatimah
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2009;5(1):11-20
Introduction: Post-prandial hyperglycemia is an important independent risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. This randomised cross-over study was conducted to compare the post-prandial glycemic and insulin responses to both high and low glycemic index (GI) meals in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods: A total of 41 patients with established T2DM (16 males, 25 males, Age= 55 ± 10 years and BMI = 27 ± 4kg/m²) were randomly given either a High GI or a Low GI meal in a cross-over manner. Both test meals were separated by one week washout periods. The meals contained almost the same amount of energy and macronutrients with the exception of the GI values (High GI=70 vs Low GI= 36). Venous blood was taken through an indwelling catheter periodically at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes respectively. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was used to calculate the post-prandial glycemia and insulin excursion over the 3-hour period. Results: The low GI meal induced lower glycemic responses at times 30,60,90 and 120 minutes (mean±SE; low GI=8.1±0.4, 9.1±0.4 and 8.9±0.4 and 8.5±0.4mmol/l vs high GI=9.1±0.4, 10.7±0.4, 11.0±0.5 and 9.7±0.5mmol/l) and reduced the insulin levels at time 60,90,120 and 150 minutes (mean±SE; low GI=215.93±15.9mmol.L/minute vs high GI=419.52±32.7mmol.L/minute) and insulin (mean±SE;low GI=1439.76±226 vs high GI=2372.76±317mIU.ml/min) curves were lower after the low GI than high GI meal respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion: The low GI meal has the ability to reduce the post-prandial hyperglycemia as well insulin responses in type 2 diabetes patients.
2.Physical Activity Pattern and Energy Expenditure of Malaysian Adults: Findings from the Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey (MANS)
Poh BK ; Safiah MY ; Tahir A ; Siti Haslinda MD ; Siti Norazlin N ; Norimah AK ; Wan Manan WM ; Mirnalini K ; Zalilah MS ; Azmi MY ; Fatimah S
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 2010;16(1):13-37
This paper aims to report the physical activity pattern and energy expenditure of adults aged 18 – 59 years in the Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS)
carried out between October 2002 and December 2003. The survey included 7349 adults representative of Peninsular Malaysia (Northern, Southern, Central and
East Coast), as well as Sabah and Sarawak. A total of 6926 adults, comprising 3343 men and 3583 women, completed the physical activity section of the survey.
Physical activity data was obtained using a physical activity questionnaire and 24-hour physical activity recall. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was calculated from
Ismail et al. (1998) predictive equations; total energy expenditure (TEE) was then estimated through factorial calculations based on time allocated and energy cost
of various activities. Physical activity level (PAL) was calculated as the ratio of TEE to BMR. It was found that almost three-quarters of Malaysian adults travelled
by passive modes of transportation. Only a third reported having ever-exercised, and an even smaller proportion of the population (14%) had adequate exercise.
The population also spent the majority of their time (74% of the day) in sedentary activities, such as sleeping or lying down; doing light intensity activities (15% of
the day), and doing moderate to vigorous intensity activities (10% of the day). Mean BMR and TEE was significantly higher amongst men than women, while
mean PAL values were similar for men [1.6 (1.6 – 1.7)] and women [1.6 (1.6 – 1.6)]. More men (16%) were categorised as having active PAL compared to women (10%), while more women (43%) were categorised as having sedentary PAL
compared to their male counterparts (37%). The present study provides the first in-depth report of the physical activity pattern, and national estimates of energy
expenditure and physical activity levels of Malaysian adults, and concluded that Malaysian adults are generally sedentary. It is thus important that physical
activity be further promoted and integrated into the lives of the population, preferably through various health promotion efforts as well as through the
commitment of the authorities in providing a suitable environment for an active lifestyle.
3.Body Mass Index (BMI) of Adults: Findings of the Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey (MANS)
Azmi MY ; Junidah R ; Siti Mariam A ; Safiah MY ; Fatimah S ; Norimah AK ; Poh BK ; Kandiah M ; Zalilah MS ; Wan Abdul Manan WM ; Siti Haslinda MD ; Tahir A
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 2009;15(2):97-119
The Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS) was carried out between October 2002 and July 2003, involving 6,775 men and 3,441 women aged 18 – 59 years.
Anthropometric assessment showed that the overall mean body weight and BMI were 62.65 kg (CI: 62.20, 63.09) and 24.37 kg/m2 (CI: 24.21, 24.53) respectively.
Based on the WHO (1998) classification of BMI, 12.15% (CI: 11.26, 13.10) were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2), and 26.71% (CI: 25.50, 27.96) overweight (BMI > 25 - 29.9
kg/m2). Significantly, more women were obese [14.66% (CI: 13.37, 16.04)] while
significantly more men were overweight [28.55% (CI: 26.77, 30.40)]. Ethnicitywise,
prevalence of obesity was highest among the Malays [15.28% (CI: 13.91, 16.77)] while overweight was highest for the Indians [31.01% (CI: 26.64, 35.76)].
Both obesity and overweight were highest among those aged 40 - 49 years.
Obesity was highest for those whose household income was between RM1,500 - 3,500 while overweight was more prevalent for those whose household income
exceeded RM3,500. The prevalence of overweight was highest for those with primary education [31.90% (CI: 29.21, 34.72)]. There was no significant urbanrural
differential in both obesity and overweight. The study found 9.02% (CI: 8.82, 10.61) with chronic energy deficiency (CED) (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2). The
prevalence of CED was relatively higher in the indigenous population (Orang Asli) [14.53% (CI: 5.14, 34.77)], subjects aged 18-19 years [26.24% (CI: 21.12, 32.09)],
and with monthly household income of < RM1,500 [10.85% (CI: 9.63, 12.20)]. The prevalence of CED was not significantly different among the geographical zones
and educational levels, and between urban/rural areas and sexes. The results call for priority action to address the serious problem of overweight and obesity
among Malaysian adults as it poses a grave burden to the country’s resources and development.
4.Meal Patterns of Malaysian Adults: Findings from the Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS)
Wan Abdul Manan WM ; Nur Firdaus I ; Safiah MY ; Siti Haslinda MD ; Poh BK ; Norimah AK ; Azmi MY ; Tahir A ; Mirnalini K ; Zalilah MS ; Fatimah S ; Siti Norazlin MN ; Fasiah W
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 2012;18(2):221-230
Introduction: Meal patterns have received little attention in nutrition studies. The aim of this study is to present the findings on general meal patterns of
Malaysian adults. Methods: The Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS), carried out in 2002 and 2003, involved 6,928 adults selected by stratified random sampling from all households by zone in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. Results: In general, the results showed that most respondents (74.16%) ate three meals per day; 89.20% of the respondents consumed breakfast, while 88.57%
consumed lunch and 91.97% consumed dinner with no significant difference in terms of sex. In Peninsular Malaysia, the Northern Zone had the highest number
of people consuming breakfast compared to other zones. Meanwhile, the population in Sarawak had the largest proportion of people consuming lunch and dinner, but the smallest proportion of people consuming breakfast. A
significantly higher number of the rural population consumed breakfast and lunch than urbanites; however there was no significant difference in dinner
consumption. Generally, breakfast consumption increased with age whereby significant difference existed between the 18 to 19 years age group and the age group of 30 years and older. Lunch intake among the age groups showed no
significant difference. In contrast, dinner consumption was significantly lower among the 18 to 19 years age group compared to all other age groups. Comparison among the ethnic groups showed that the Indian population had the lowest percentage of having breakfast and lunch while the Orang Asli had the lowest percentage of consuming dinner. However, the Orang Asli recorded the highest
percentage for taking breakfast and lunch while the Chinese had the highest percentage of taking dinner. Conclusion: Considering that Malaysian adults
consumed their conventional breakfast, lunch and dinner, these findings indicatethat Malaysians are maintaining their traditional meal patterns.
5.Food Consumption Patterns: Findings from the Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey (MANS)
Norimah AK ; Safiah M ; Jamal K ; Siti Haslinda ; Zuhaida H ; Rohida S ; Fatimah S ; Siti Norazlin ; Poh BK ; Kandiah M ; Zalilah MS ; Wan Manan WM ; Fatimah S ; Azmi MY
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 2008;14(1):25-39
This study reports the food consumption patterns of adults aged 18 to 59 years in the Malaysian Adults Nutrition Survey (MANS) carried out between October
2002 and December 2003. A total of 6,742 subjects comprising 3,274 men and 3,468 women representing the northern, central , southern and east coast of
Peninsular Malaysia as well as Sabah and Sarawak were interviewed. A semiquantitative
food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) which consisted of 126 food items was used to evaluate the food consumption pattern (habitual food intake) of the respondents during the previous one- year period. The results demonstrate
that nasi putih (cooked rice) was consumed by 97% of the population twice daily (average 2½ plates per day). Other food items consumed daily were marine fish,
(one medium fish per day), green leafy vegetables (one cup per day) and sweetened condensed milk (three teaspoons per day. The mean frequencies for daily intake
of rice, leafy vegetables, marine fish, local kuih, anchovy(ikan bilis) and biscuits were significantly higher among the rural compared to the urban adults. In
contrast, more urban dwellers consumed chicken and eggs more frequently than their rural counterparts. More men than women consumed chicken and eggs
more frequently. Malaysian adults showed a satisfactory habit of drinking plain water, with 99% drinking at least six glasses of plain water daily. Other beverages
such as tea (47%), coffee (28%), chocolate-based drinks (23%) and cordial syrup (11%) were also consumed on daily basis, however, in a smaller proportion of the
population. There were differences in the prevalence of daily consumption of foods when comparing urban and rural population, and also between men and
women. The prevalence of daily consumption of marine fish among rural and urban adults was 51% and 34% respectively. For sweetened condensed milk, men and women consumed 43% and 28% respectively; however, more women
drank full cream milk than men. Between the age groups, 21% of adults below 20 years old consumed chicken at least once a day, while this pattern of intake was
not shown in the older age groups. Our findings show that adults, aged 50 to 59 years old, had the highest prevalence of daily consumption of full cream milk
with 24% while those aged 18 to 19 years old had the lowest prevalence of daily consumption at 15%. The food consumption pattern of Malaysian adults appears
to be satisfactory. However, some changes in food habits are recommended especially in substituting the less wholesome sweetened condensed milk with
the more nutritious full cream or skimmed milk.