Objective: Splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy is occasionally performed during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. We investigated pre-, intra-, postoperative risk factors and predictors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: We investigated 165 consecutive patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma categorized as stage III/IV disease, who underwent splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy as a component of cytoreductive surgery performed as initial treatment at Chiba University Hospital. Patient characteristics, clinical factors, and surgical outcomes were compared between those with and without CR-POPF. Results: CR-POPF occurred in 20 patients (12%). There were no significant intergroup differences in the characteristics between patients with CR-POPF and patients without CR-POPF except for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, amylase (AMY) levels in drain fluid on postoperative day (POD)1 and POD3, and pancreatic stump thickness. Multivariate analysis showed that the POD3 drain fluid AMY level was the only significant risk factor and predictor of CR-POPF in patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the POD3 drain fluid AMY level, which predicted development of CR-POPF showed an area under the curve of 0.77, and the optimal cut-off value of AMY was 808 U/L. A pancreatic fistula did not occur in patients with POD3 drain fluid AMY levels <130 U/L. Conclusion The POD3 drain fluid AMY level can be early diagnostic predictor CR-POPF after splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Objective: This study was performed to examine the safety of bowel resection and upper abdominal surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer performed by gynecologic oncologists after training in a monodisciplinary surgical team. Methods: We implemented a monodisciplinary surgical team consisting of specialized gynecologic oncologist for advanced ovarian cancer. In the initial learning period in 65 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) III/IV, a gynecologic oncologist who had a certification as a general surgeon trained 2 other gynecologic oncologists in bowel resection and upper abdominal surgery for 4 years. After the initial learning period, the trained gynecologic oncologists performed surgeries without the certificated general surgeon in 195 patients with FIGO III/IV. The surgical outcomes and perioperative complications during the 2 periods were evaluated. Results: The rates of achieving no gross disease after cytoreductive surgery were 80.0% in the initial learning period and 83.6% in the post-learning period (p=0.560). The incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectosigmoid resection, symptomatic pleural effusion or pneumothorax after right diaphragm resection, and pancreatic fistula after splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy in the 2 periods were 2 of 34 (6.0%), 1 of 33 (3.0%), and 3 of 15 (20.0%) patients in the initial learning period, and 12 of 147 (8.2%), 1 of 118 (0.8%), and 11 of 84 (13.1%) patients in the post-learning period, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (p=0.270, p=0.440, p=0.520, respectively). Conclusion Bowel resection and upper abdominal surgery can be performed safely by gynecologic oncologists.

Objective: We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of tailored-dose chemotherapy with gemcitabine and irinotecan for platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. Methods: We enrolled patients with ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer who received ≥2 previous chemotherapeutic regimens but developed progressive disease during platinumbased chemotherapy or within 6 months post-treatment. All patients received gemcitabine (500 mg/m 2 ) and irinotecan (50 mg/m 2 ) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days at the starting dose. The dose was increased or decreased by 4 levels in subsequent cycles based on hematological or non-hematological toxicities observed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: We investigated 25 patients who received 267 cycles (median 8 cycles/patient) between October 2008 and May 2011. Tailored-dose gemcitabine was administered up to the 5th cycle as follows: 1,000 mg/m 2 in 1 (4%), 750 mg/m 2 in 16 (64%), 500 mg/m 2 in 6 (24%), and 250 mg/m 2 in 2 patients (8%). The median PFS and OS were 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.7–10.7) and 16.8 months (95% CI=9.4–30.7), respectively. The DCR was 76%, and PFS was >6 months in 12 of 25 patients (48%). Grade 3 hematological toxicities included leukopenia (9.4%), neutropenia (11.2%), anemia (9.8%), and thrombocytopenia (1.1%).Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur except for fatigue in one patient. Conclusions Tailored-dose chemotherapy with gemcitabine and irinotecan was effective and well tolerated in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Anastomotic Leak ; Certification ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Diaphragm ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Learning ; Obstetrics ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Pancreatectomy ; Pancreatic Fistula ; Pleural Effusion ; Pneumothorax ; Postoperative Complications ; Splenectomy

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the presence of pathological residual tumor (pRT) in each initial disseminated site after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to assess the appropriate surgical margins during interval debulking surgery (IDS) for a favorable prognosis. Methods: This prospective descriptive study included patients with stage IIIC–IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer. One hundred eleven patients underwent diagnostic exploratory laparotomy, and their initial intra-abdominal dissemination statuses were recorded. Any tumor >1 cm in diameter found during the exploratory laparotomy was resected during IDS even if it was macroscopically invisible after NACT. The pRT rate after NACT and negative predictive value (NPV; probability that sites with macroscopically invisible tumors have no pRT) during IDS were assessed in each disseminated site. Results: A median of 5 NACT cycles were performed. Sites with a high incidence of pRT and low NPV included the rectosigmoid colon (71.4%, 38.6%), transverse mesentery (70.3%, 50.0%), greater omentum (68.3%, 51.7%), right diaphragm (61.9%, 48.1%), paracolic gutters (61.1%, 50.0%), and vesicouterine pouch (56.6%, 50.0%). Organs/tissues with a high incidence of pRT featured a low NPV. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in this cohort were 27.7 and 71.9 months, respectively. Conclusion Even if a disseminated site >1 cm in diameter before NACT is invisible during IDS, microscopic disease remains present within it. The appropriate surgical margins for IDS with a favorable prognosis could be secured by resecting a lesion of >1 cm before NACT even if it is invisible during IDS.