It is important to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient care and the needs of inpatients and their families. We conducted an anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey of inpatients who had been referred to our palliative care team, their families (hereafter referred to as patients' families), and their primary nurses (hereafter referred to as PNs). The EZR statistical software was used for statistical analysis, and p<0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. 31 patients [9 males, 22 females; median age 65 years (range 30-85 years)], 25 family members, and 26 PNs responded. The question “Do you ever feel depressed due to restricted visitation?” had a significantly stronger impact on patient families than on patients (p<0.05). Compared to patients, patient families tended to prefer face-to-face visits (p<0.05). The impact of visitation restrictions was greater on patients’ families than on the inpatients, suggesting that it is important to provide care and support to patients’ families especially during periods when there are visitation restrictions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of a short food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for food group intake in Japan, the reproducibility and partial validity of which were previously confirmed for nutrients. METHODS: A total of 288 middle-aged healthy volunteers from 11 different areas of Japan provided nonconsecutive 3-day weighed dietary records (DRs) at 3-month intervals over four seasons. We evaluated reproducibility based on the first (FFQ1) and second (FFQ2) questionnaires and their validity against the DRs by comparing the intake of 20 food groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (SRs) were calculated between energy-adjusted intake from the FFQs and that from the DRs. RESULTS: The intake of 20 food groups estimated from the two FFQs was mostly equivalent. The median energy-adjusted SRs between the FFQ1 and FFQ2 were 0.61 (range 0.38-0.86) for men and 0.66 (0.45-0.84) for women. For validity, the median de-attenuated SRs between DRs and the FFQ1 were 0.51 (0.17-0.76) for men and 0.47 (0.23-0.77) for women. Compared with the DRs, the proportion of cross-classification into exact plus adjacent quintiles with the FFQ1 ranged from 58 to 86% in men and from 57 to 86% in women. According to the robust Z scores and the Bland-Altman plot graphs, the underestimation errors in the FFQ1 tended to be greater in individuals with high mean levels of consumption for meat for men and for other vegetables for both men and women. CONCLUSION The FFQ demonstrated high reproducibility and reasonable validity for food group intake. This questionnaire is short and remains appropriate for identifying associations between diet and health/disease among adults in Japan.
Adult ; Aged ; Diet/statistics & numerical data* ; Diet Surveys ; Energy Intake ; Female ; Food/statistics & numerical data* ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results