1.Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS-T).
Murat BEKTAS ; Ilknur BEKTAS ; Dijle AYAR ; Yasemin SELEKOGLU ; Ugur AYAR ; Aslı Akdeniz KUDUBES ; Sema Sal ALTAN ; Merry ARMSTRONG
Asian Nursing Research 2016;10(1):62-67
PURPOSE: The aim of the research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale-Turkish Version (PDSS-T). METHODS: The researchers chose a study sample of 522 grade 5e11 students. Data were collected using a demographic data collection form and the PDSS-T. RESULTS: Cronbach a for the scale was .79 and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was .78. Item-total correlations for the scale varied between .53 and .73 (p < .001). The indices of model fit were determined to be the root mean square error of approximation at .07, the goodness of fit index at .97, and the comparative fit index at .97. CONCLUSIONS: The study's results showed that PDSS-T is a valid and reliable instrument for detecting Turkish-speaking children's and adolescents' daytime sleepiness. PDSS-T is convenient for professionals to prevent and manage daytime sleepiness.
Adolescent
;
Child
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/*diagnosis
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Psychometrics/*instrumentation
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Translations
;
Turkey
2.Developing the Scale for Quality of Life in Pediatric Oncology Patients Aged 13-18: Adolescent Form and Parent Form.
Murat BEKTAS ; Aslı AKDENIZ KUDUBES ; Ozlem UGUR ; Canan VERGIN ; Bengü DEMIRAG
Asian Nursing Research 2016;10(2):106-115
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop the Scale for Quality of Life in Pediatric Oncology Patients Aged 13-18: Adolescent Form and Parent Form. METHODS: We used the child and parent information form, Visual Quality of Life Scale, and our own scale, the Scale for Quality of Life in Pediatric Oncology Patients Aged 13-18: Adolescent Form and Parent Form.We finalized the 35-item scale to determine the items, received opinions from 14 specialists on the scale, and pilot-tested the scale in 25 children and their parents. We used Pearson correlation analysis, Cronbach α coefficient, factor analysis and receiver operating characteristics analysis to analyze the data. RESULTS: The total Cronbach α of the parent form was .97, the total factor load was .60-.97 and the total variance was 80.4%. The cutoff point of the parent formwas 85.50. The total Cronbach α of the adolescent form was .98, the total factor load was .62-.96, and the total variance explained was 83.4%. The cutoff point of the adolescent form was 75.50. As a result of the parent form factor analysis, we determined the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient as .83, the Barlett test χ2 as 12,615.92; the factor coefficients of all items of the parent form ranged from .63 to .98. The factor coefficients of all items of the adolescent form ranged from .34 to .99. As a result of the adolescent form factor analysis, we determined the KMO as .79, and the Barlett test χ2 as 13,970.62. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, we found that the adolescent form and the parent formwere valid and reliable in assessing the children's quality of life.
Adolescent
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Neoplasms/*psychology
;
Parents
;
*Quality of Life
;
ROC Curve
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Surveys and Questionnaires/*standards