1.The application of the ADDIE model and the training cycle in the development, implementation and evaluation of training program on data use for decision-making among end-users of electronic health information system in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas.
Jonathan P. Guevarra ; Arturo M. Ongkeko Jr. ; Carl Abelardo T. Antonio ; Amiel Nazer C. Bermudez ; Portia H. Fernandez&ndash ; Marcelo
Acta Medica Philippina 2021;55(4):398-405
OBJECTIVE:
This paper describes the process utilized in developing a training program on data use for decision-
making tailored for real-time monitoring of maternal and child health indicators through Community Health
Information Tracking System (rCHITS) end-users in selected areas in the Philippines.
METHODS:
Guided by the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) model and
the training cycle, existing records and reports lodged with the National Telehealth Center (NTHC) pertaining to
rCHITS were reviewed, supplemented by interviews with the technical staff of the NTHC and discussion with
healthcare workers. Training design was developed, training modules and materials were prepared, critiqued, revised
and finalized. The training was implemented and evaluated using an evaluation tool designed for this specific
capability-building endeavors.
RESULTS:
A tailored training program on data use for decision-making was designed for rCHITS end-users in select
areas in the Philippines. The process of developing the training program was guided by the ADDIE Model and the
Training Cycle. Training was delivered to a total of 128 public health workers. Majority of the participants gave high
evaluation on the clarity and relevance of objectives, discussion of topics, methods of delivery, and time devoted
in addressing issues (range 3.5-3.8 out of highest possible score of 4)
CONCLUSION
This paper demonstrates the utility of the ADDIE Model and the Training Cycle in developing a training
program aimed at enhancing the capability of the field personnel in utilizing the data generated from rCHITS in
decision-making. Training participants must also be monitored and evaluated in their workplace setting in order to
determine if the concepts and principles covered during the training program are put into practice.
Philippines
2.Incorporating praxis into community engagement- self monitoring: A case study on applied social innovation in rural Philippines
Arturo M. Ongkeko Jr. ; Pauline Marie P. Tiangco ; Jana Deborah Mier-Alpañ ; o ; Jose Rene B. Cruz ; Wilfredo P. Awitan ; Joey G. Escauso ; Alfredo M. Coro II ; Uche V. Amazigo ; Beatrice M. Halpaap ; Meredith del Pilar-Labarda
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(Early Access 2024):1-16
Background:
Social Innovation in Health Initiative Philippines introduced the community engagement self-monitoring strategy in two community-managed social innovations in 2021. Phase 1 demonstrated the strategy's viability by identifying community “local monitors,” selecting indicators, monitoring, and conducting feedback sessions. In 2022, a second phase was implemented to improve the process by integrating capacity-building activities and praxis sessions, and gathering insights on the strategy’s sustainability.
Objective:
In this paper, we sought to describe the stages of the CE-SM strategy applied within a Philippine local health system in geographically isolated and disadvantaged contexts. Specifically, we: 1) Identified the key competencies of the local CE-SM monitors; 2) facilitated capacity building to strengthen their skills and abilities; 3) explored sustainability mechanisms; and 4) identified integration points of the CE-SM in strengthening local health systems.
Methods:
Two communities in a rural municipality implementing a social innovation called the “Seal of Health Governance'' were chosen for the expanded community engagement self-monitoring (CE-SM) pilot. Profiling of local monitors and self-assessment of competencies were facilitated. Capacity-building activities were conducted for community engagement, data processing, and data analysis, complemented by praxis sessions guided by people-centered principles.
Results:
Local monitors from both communities showed determination in performing their responsibilities but differed in their levels of participation. Their appreciation of their role increased as it broadened from merely collecting data to understanding and using it to advocate for their community’s needs. The minimum resources for communities to implement the strategy include financial mechanisms to ensure the availability of resources. Local monitors have improved their ability to analyze their communities' realities, particularly regarding health leadership and governance.
Conclusions
Community engagement self-monitoring is a feasible and sustainable strategy for monitoring and evaluating health interventions if adequate support is provided and complemented by capacity-building and praxis sessions. It promotes listening to the community and empowering them to participate in decision-making, which are vital in fostering ownership and sustainability of social innovations in health.
Philippines
;
Health