Ultrasonography has been established as one of the important diagnostic tools in detecting and classifying ovarian masses. Several studies have been made in determining the sensitivity and specificity of the different scoring systems as to determining the malignancy of ovarian masses. In a tertiary hospital ultrasound diagnostic unit, three scoring systems are utilized namely Lerner, Sassone and IOTA simple rules. With this reason, it is important to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity on the most utilized ultrasound scoring systems in determining malignancy of ovarian masses. A single center observational, analytical, cross-sectional study utilizing review of the transvaginal or pelvic ultrasound results of women with ovarian masses that were scored using Sassone, Lerner and IOTA Simple Rules in a tertiary hospital ultrasound diagnostics unit from January 2013 to June 2016 was done. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each scoring system utilized was determined and compared with the histopathologic result. Out of the 111 ovarian masses that were included in the study, 44 ovarian masses were scored using Lerner Scoring system with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 65% 22.2% and 100%. 105 ovarian masses screened using Sassone Scoring System showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 68%, 20.5% and 100%. A total of 33 out of the 111 ovarian masses were scored using the IOTA scoring system with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 85.6%, 55.5% and 100%. In conclusion, IOTA simple rules had a high sensitivity and specificity compared to Sassone or Lerner Scoring System. However, we cannot fully conclude that individual specificity will be better than combined tests since there is limited number of ovarian masses analyzed.
Retrospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Ultrasonography

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography has been established as one of the important diagnostic tools in detecting and classifying ovarian masses. Several studies have been made in determining the sensitivity and specificity of the different scoring systems as to determining the malignancy of ovarian masses. In a tertiary hospital ultrasound diagnostic unit, three scoring systems are utilized namely Lerner, Sassone and IOTA simple rules.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity on the most utilized ultrasound scoring systems in determining malignancy of ovarian masses.
METHODS: A single center observational, analytical, cross-sectional study utilizing review of the transvaginal or pelvic ultrasound results of women with ovarian masses that were scored using Sassone, Lerner and IOTA Simple Rules in a tertiary hospital ultrasound diagnostics unit from January 2013 to June 2016 was done. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each scoring system utilized was determined and compared with the histopathologic result.
RESULTS: Out of the 111 ovarian masses that were included in the study, 44 ovarian masses were scored using Lerner Scoring system with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 65% 22.2% and 100%. 105 ovarian masses screened using Sassone Scoring System showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 68%, 20.5% and 100%. A total of 33 out of the 111 ovarian masses were scored using the IOTA scoring system with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 85.6%, 55.5% and 100%.
CONCLUSION: IOTA simple rules had a high sensitivity and specificity compared to Sassone or Lerner Scoring System. However, we cannot fully conclude that individual specificity will be better than combined tests since there is limited number of ovarian masses analyzed.

Human ; Female ; High-energy Shock Waves ; Neoplasms ; Pelvis ; Sensitivity And Specificity ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Ultrasonics ; Ovary

The case report discusses a rare occurrence of tubal pregnancy in a patient with uterine didelphys, managed using combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. A 29-year-old Gravida 2 Para 0 (0010) with a right tubal ectopic pregnancy alongside incidental uterine didelphys detected via physical examination and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. The patient underwent a combined diagnostic and operative laparoscopy, where a right salpingectomy was performed using a harmonic scalpel. Diagnostic laparoscopy showed two uterine horns with each attached fallopian tube and ovary with an interostial length of 4 cm. Diagnostic hysteroscopy confirmed the presence of two separate uterine cavities and cervices without communication. The procedure demonstrated that the technique for laparoscopic salpingectomy in cases of uterine didelphys parallels that for a normal uterus. The use of combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy proved effective in evaluating both the external uterine structure and internal cavity, facilitating accurate diagnosis and treatment of Müllerian anomalies with ectopic pregnancy.

Human ; Female ; Adult: 25-44 Yrs Old ; Hysteroscopy ; Laparoscopy ; Pregnancy, Tubal ; Uterine Didelphys