BACKGROUND

Endovascular technique has replaced open repair as primary treatment for different aortic disease indications and was associated with low perioperative mortality and acceptable short-, mid-, and long-term survival. Locally, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was not widely practiced until year 2017. This study aims to determine the predictors of in-hospital and short-term outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome in a single center and how it compares with local and international data.

This study is a retrospective analysis of 52 adult patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome. Demographic and clinical data, diagnostic imaging, and procedural details were obtained via inpatient charts at the medical records section and hospital system database archiving. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year postprocedure were obtained through telephone follow-up after attaining verbal consent.

Gathered data were analyzed as to association of different variables with or without the presence of complications. Outcomes reported included in-hospital mortality rate, presence of major adverse events (MAEs), 30-day and 1-year survival rates, and rate of freedom from reintervention.

The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.69% (n = 4/52), and complication rate was 32% (n = 20/52), with a survival rate of 92.31% and 87.76% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The rates of overall freedom from reintervention were 83.33% and 100% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The independent predictors for in-hospital mortality and development of MAEs were increasing weight (odds ratio [OR], 1.0588; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003–1.208), preexisting chronic kidney disease (OR, 10.33; 95% CI, 1.1069–96.462), and TEVAR with debranching done as a single procedure (OR, 3.6667; 95% CI, 1.1154–12.054), whereas an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 49.05 ± 19.25 (OR, 0.9402; 95% CI, 0.9019–0.9801) and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure (OR, 0.1624; 95% CI, 0.0321–0.8225) statistically decrease the risk for development of in-hospital mortality and MAEs (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively).

In this single-center study, indications for TEVAR were fusiform and saccular aneurysm, high-risk intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer, complicated acute type B dissection, chronic complicated type B dissection with high-risk feature, and aortic rupture. The outcome of this study shows comparable results with other international studies with an acceptable in-hospital mortality rate, complication rate, short-term survival rate, and rate freedom from reintervention at 30 days and 1 year. Increasing weight, preexisting chronic kidney disease, and TEVAR with debranching done as a single setting are independent predictors for developing in-hospital mortality and MAEs, whereas a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure decrease the risk; hence, careful planning and scheduling of procedure among elective and amenable cases could further reduce complication rates of future TEVAR procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different manners of heat exposure on thoracic aorta injury in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and explore the underlying mechanism. METHODS: Normal 6 to 7-week-old male SHRs were randomized into control group (cage at room temperature), intermittent heat exposure group (SHR-8 group, exposed to 32 ℃ for 8 h daily for 7 days) and SHR-24 group (with continuous exposure to 32 ℃ for 7 days). After the treatments, the pathologies of the thoracic aorta of the rats were observed with HE staining, and the expressions of Beclin1, LC3B and p62 were detected with Western blotting and immunofluorescence assay; TUNEL staining was used to observe cell apoptosis in the thoracic aorta, and the expressions of caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2 were detected using Western blotting. The effects of intraperitoneal injections of 3-MA (an autophagy agonist), rapamycin (an autophagy inhibitor) or compound C 30 min before intermittent heat exposure on the expressions of proteins associated with autophagy, apoptosis and the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway in the aorta were examined with immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In SHR-8 group, the rats showed incomplete aortic intima with disordered cell distribution and significantly increased expressions of Beclin1, LC3II/LC3I and Bax, lowered expressions of p62 and Bcl-2, and increased apoptotic cells in the thoracic aorta (P < 0.05). Pretreatment with 3-MA obviously inhibited the expressions of autophagy- and apoptosis-related proteins, whereas rapamycin promoted their expressions. Compared with the control group, the rats in SHR-8 group had significantly down-regulated p-mTOR and up-regulated p-AMPK and p-ULK1 expression of in the aorta; Treatment with compound C obviously lowered the expressions of p-AMPK and p-ULK1 and those of LC3B and Beclin1 as well. CONCLUSION In SHRs, intermittent heat exposure causes significant pathologies and promotes autophagy and apoptosis in the thoracic aorta possibly by activating the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway.
Rats ; Male ; Animals ; Rats, Inbred SHR ; AMP-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism* ; bcl-2-Associated X Protein/metabolism* ; Aorta, Thoracic ; Beclin-1 ; Hot Temperature ; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism* ; Apoptosis ; Aortic Diseases ; Autophagy ; Autophagy-Related Protein-1 Homolog/metabolism*

Humans ; Aortic Valve/surgery* ; Heart Valve Diseases ; China ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Humans ; Aortic Valve/surgery* ; Heart Valve Diseases ; China ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Aortic Valve ; Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery* ; China ; Heart Valve Diseases/surgery* ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; Humans ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To compare the impact of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent TAVR in our hospital from January 2019 to March 2021. Patients were divided into BAV group and TAV group according to aortic contrast-enhanced CT. Each patient was followed up by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and echocardiography at four time points, namely before TAVR, 24 hours, 1 month and 6 months after TAVR. Echocardiographic data, including mean pressure gradient (MPG), aortic valve area (AVA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricle mass (LVM) and LV mass index (LVMi) were evaluated. Results: A total of 41 patients were included. The age was (75.0±8.6) years, and male patients accounted for 53.7%. There were 19 BAV patients and 22 TAV patients in this cohort. All patients undergoing TAVR using a self-expandable prosthesis Venus-A valve. MPG was (54.16±21.22) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) before TAVR, (21.11±9.04) mmHg at 24 hours after TAVR, (18.84±7.37) mmHg at 1 month after TAVR, (17.68±6.04) mmHg at 6 months after TAVR in BAV group. LVEF was (50.42±13.30)% before TAVR, (53.84±10.59)% at 24 hours after TAVR, (55.68±8.71)% at 1 month after TAVR and (57.42±7.78)% at 6 months after TAVR in BAV group. MPG and LVEF substantially improved at each time point after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05) in BAV group. MPG in TAV group improved at each time point after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). LVMi was (164.13±49.53), (156.37±39.11), (146.65±38.84) and (134.13±39.83) g/m² at the 4 time points and the value was significantly reduced at 1 and 6 months post TAVR compared to preoperative level(both P<0.05). LVEF in the TAV group remained unchanged at 24 hours after operation, but it was improved at 1 month and 6 months after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). LVMi in TAV group substantially improved at each time point after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). NT-proBNP in both two groups improved after operation, at 1 month and 6 months after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). MPG in TAV group improved better than in BAV group during the postoperative follow-up (24 hours after TAVR: (11.68±5.09) mmHg vs. (21.11±9.04) mmHg, P<0.001, 1 month after TAVR: (10.82±3.71) mmHg vs. (18.84±7.37) mmHg, P<0.001, 6 months after TAVR: (12.36±4.42) mmHg vs. (17.68±6.04) mmHg, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in NT-proBNP between BAV group and TAV group at each time point after operation (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in paravalvular regurgitation and second prosthesis implantation between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: AS patients with BAV or TAV experience hemodynamic improvement and obvious left ventricular reverse remodeling after TAVR, and the therapeutic effects of TAVR are similar between BAV and TAV AS patients in the short-term post TAVR.
Humans ; Male ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Aortic Valve/surgery* ; Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease/surgery* ; Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke Volume ; Heart Valve Diseases ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Remodeling ; Hemodynamics

Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) refers to the stenosis and occlusion of the distal abdominal aorta and(or) bifurcation of the aortoiliac artery,which is mainly caused by atherosclerosis,leading to pelvic and lower limb ischemia.Open surgery has always been the main treatment for complex AIOD.However,in recent years,with the development of endovascular surgery technologies and medical instruments,its treatment concept has been greatly changed.More and more clinical evidence has proved that the long-term efficacy of endovascular therapy is not inferior to that of traditional open surgery,so minimally invasive endovascular therapy has become the preferred treatment for AIOD.
Aortic Diseases/surgery* ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery* ; Atherosclerosis ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Iliac Artery/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency

Acute Disease ; Aorta ; Aortic Diseases/therapy* ; Humans ; Syndrome

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery* ; Aortic Diseases ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients with severe traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Methods: A total of 25 patients with TAI, who hospitalized in our hospital between August 2005 to March 2021 and underwent thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR), were included in this retrospective study. According to the time from admission to TEVAR, the patients were divided into emergency TEVAR group (14 cases, TEVAR within 24 h of admission) and elective TEVAR group (11 cases, patients underwent surgery or fracture reduction and fixation first for serious injuries and then underwent TEVAR more than 24 h after admission). The general clinical data of patients, injury severity score (ISS), time from admission to intervention, total hospital stay, the proportion of closed chest drainage and the proportion of abdominal organ repair were obtained and compared. Clinical follow-up and 1-year postoperative aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) were performed on the patients. Death, the occurrence of aortic adverse events and injury recovery were followed up and recorded. Results: The mean age of these 25 TAI patients was (41.4±14.4) years, 20 patients were males (80.0%). 21 patients (84.0%) had persistent chest and back pain, 17 (68.0%) had pleural effusion and 5 (20.0%) had mediastinal hematoma. The injury severity score (ISS) was significantly higher in the elective TEVAR group than in the emergency TEVAR group (24.9±14.4 vs. 35.5±9.3, P=0.044). The time from admission to intervention ((1.0±0.0) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.001], the time from admission to TEVAR ((1.0±0.0) d vs. (11.5±13.8) d, P=0.030) and total hospital stay ((6.1±2.3) d vs. (26.8±7.7) d, P<0.001) were significantly longer in elective TEVAR group than in emergency TEVAR group. The proportion of thoracic closed drainage was significantly lower in the elective TEVAR group than in the emergency TEVAR group (9 (64.3%) vs. 2 (18.2%), P=0.042). The proportion of abdominal organ repair was significantly higher than in the emergency TEVAR group (0 vs. 4 (36.4%), P=0.026). All of 25 patients were discharged alive and followed up for (84.0±30.5) months. All patients survived and completed 1-year postoperation CTA. There were no aortic adverse events occurred, and no complications after surgery, and the fractures and organ injuries healed well. Conclusions: The clinical characteristics of severe TAI are acute multi-injuries combined with persistent chest and/or back pain, pleural effusion, and mediastinal hematoma. Timely diagnosis and treatment are important factors for the outcome. The treatment strategy for multi-injuries should give priority to dealing with life-threatening injuries. TEVAR is the primary treatment strategy for severe TAI and is related to satisfactory outcomes.
Adult ; Aorta, Thoracic/surgery* ; Aortic Diseases ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects* ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Female ; Hematoma/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pleural Effusion/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome