Adult ; Aortic Aneurysm ; etiology ; Aortic Coarctation ; complications ; diagnosis ; Female ; Humans

Aged ; Aneurysm, False ; complications ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ; complications ; Aortic Diseases ; etiology ; Esophageal Fistula ; etiology ; Humans ; Male

Aneurysm, Dissecting ; etiology ; Aortic Aneurysm ; complications ; Aortic Rupture ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sinus of Valsalva ; Ventricular Septum

Adult ; Aneurysm, Dissecting ; complications ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ; complications ; Compartment Syndromes ; complications ; Humans ; Male

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surgery has become a more prevalent in recent years, as it is less invasive and requires a shorter hospital stay and recovery time, in addition to resulting in lower mortality. However, EVAR has the disadvantage of increased numbers of reintervention incidents, need of regular follow up, and uncertainty of long-term stability. Type II endoleak is the most common endoleak, but it mostly seals without intervention. Type I endoleak is a sealing failure around the graft and proximal neck or distal landing zone and usually occurs during the initial procedure, which can be corrected by ballooning, an additional stent (bare or graft), or surgery. Late type I endoleak can develop by migration of the graft or shrinkage or progression of aneurysm. Here we report a case of distal type I endoleak found 5 years after EVAR which was corrected by additional endovascular grafts.
Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Endoleak ; Follow-Up Studies ; Length of Stay ; Neck ; Postoperative Complications ; Stents ; Transplants ; Uncertainty

Acute Disease ; Aneurysm, Dissecting ; complications ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ; complications ; Female ; Humans ; Myocardial Infarction ; etiology

Adult ; Aneurysm, Dissecting ; complications ; Aortic Aneurysm ; complications ; Humans ; Lower Extremity ; physiopathology ; Male

Adult ; Aneurysm, Dissecting ; complications ; pathology ; Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction ; etiology ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic ; complications ; Humans ; Male

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has come into use and been widely extended because of the low complication rate and less-invasiveness. This article aimed to describe our experience in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with EVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for the 22 patients who underwent EVAR in a single hospital December 2001 to June 2009. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 68.5+/-7.6 years. There were several risk factors and comorbidities in 20 patients (90.9%). The mean diameter of the aortic aneurysms was 61.2+/-12.9 mm. The mean length, diameter, and angle of the aneurysmal neck were 30.5+/-15.5 mm, 24.0+/-4.5 mm, and 43.9+/-16.0degrees, respectively. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 28.8+/-29.5 months. The 30-day postoperative mortality was none. Seven patients (31.8%) had endoleaks during the hospital stay and three patients (13.6%) had endoleaks during the follow-up period. One patient (4.5%) died due to a ruptured aortic aneurysm. The cumulative patient survival rates were 88.2%, 88.2%, and 70.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: EVAR is currently a safe, feasible procedure for high risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm because of low postoperative complication and mortality if patients are selected properly and followed up carefully.
Aneurysm ; Aorta, Abdominal ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Aortic Rupture ; Comorbidity ; Endoleak ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Neck ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUND: Recently, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), have been used for treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome and predictors for 30-day mortality and complications, in patients that underwent EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia. METHODS: In this study, 151 cases of EVAR and/or TEVAR under general anesthesia in 140 patients during 2009–2017 were studied. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used, to clarify risk for postoperative 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 9.9% in the study population (10.3% in EVAR, and 9.3% in TEVAR, respectively). Seventy-two cases (47.7%) experienced postoperative complications within 30 days. Elderly older than age 76.5 (odds ratio [ORs] = 48.89, 95% confidential interval [95% CI] 1.40–1,710.25, P = 0.032), technically expertness (OR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.40, P = 0.013), severity of systemic complications (OR = 23.24, 95% CI, 2.27–238.24, P = 0.008), and severity of local-vascular complications (OR = 31.87, 95% CI, 1.29–784.66, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that elderly, technically expertness, and severity of systemic and local-vascular complications were associated with 30-day mortality of EVAR and TEVAR in aortic aneurysm.
Aged ; Anesthesia, General ; Aortic Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Logistic Models ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome