We report a case of surgically treated abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient having crossed ectopia with fusion anomaly of the kidney. One artery from the abdominal aorta above the aneurysm supplies the right kidney while three renal arteries (two from the aneurysm itself and one from the left common iliac artery) supply the crossed ectopic kidney. Preoperative imaging to define the arterial and collecting systems along with a detailed planning of the operation is essential to prevent ischemic renal injury as well as ureteral injury during AAA repair.
Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/*complications/pathology/*surgery ; Choristoma/*complications/pathology ; Human ; *Kidney ; Kidney Diseases/*complications/pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Male

PURPOSE: This single-institution retrospective review examines the management of uninfected para-anastomotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (PAAA), developed after infrarenal grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1979 to November 2005, 31 PAAA were observed in our Department. Twenty-six uninfected PAAA of degenerative etiology, including 24 false and 2 true aneurysms, were candidates for intervention and retrospectively included in our database for management and outcome evaluation. Six (23%) patients were treated as emergencies. Surgery included tube graft interposition (n = 12), new reconstruction (n = 8), and graft removal with extra-anatomic bypass (n = 3). Endovascular management (n = 3) consisted of free-flow tube endografts. RESULTS: The mortality rate among the elective and emergency cases was 5% and 66.6%, respectively (p = 0.005). The morbidity rate in elective cases was 57.8%, whereas 75% in emergency cases (p = 0.99). The survival rate during the follow-up was significantly higher for elective cases than for emergency cases. CONCLUSION: Uninfected PAAA is a late complication of aortic grafting, tends to evolve silently and is difficult to diagnose. The prevalence is underestimated and increases with time since surgery. The mortality rate is higher among patients treated as an emergency than among patients who undergo elective surgery, therefore, elective treatment and aggressive management in the case of pseudoaneurysm are the keys to obtain a good outcome. Endovascular treatment could reduce mortality. Patients who undergo infrarenal aortic grafting require life-long surveillance after surgery.
Aged ; Aneurysm, False/surgery ; Aneurysm, Infected/pathology/*surgery ; Aorta, Abdominal/pathology/surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/*surgery ; *Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Despite the wide acceptance of endovascular aneurysmal repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), stringent morphologic criteria recommended by manufacturers may preclude this treatment in patients with AAA. The purpose of this study was to investigate how many patients are feasible by Zenith and Excluder stent graft system, which are available in Korea. Eighty-two AAA patients (71 men, mean age 70 yr) who had been treated surgically or medically from January 2005 to December 2006 were included. Criteria for morphologic suitability (MS) were examined to focus on characteristics of aneurysm; proximal and distal landing zone; angulation and involvement of both iliac artery aneurysms. Twenty-eight patients (34.1%) were feasible in Zenith stent graft and 31 patients (37.8%) were feasible in Excluder. The patients who were excluded EVAR had an average of 1.61 exclusion criteria. The main reasons for exclusion were an unfavorable proximal neck (n=34, 41.5%) and problem of distal landing zone (n=25, 30.5%). There was no statistical significance among gender, age or aneurysm size in terms of MS. Only 32 patients (39%) who had AAA were estimated to be suitable for two currently approved grafts by strict criteria. However, even unfavorable AAA patients who have severe co-mobidities will be included in EVAR in the near future. Therefore, more efforts including fine skill and anatomical understanding will be needed to meet these challenging cases.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/pathology/*surgery ; *Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged

Aortoenteric fistula is one of the most challenging problems that confront the vascular surgeons. Controversy remains over the optimal treatment because of the continued publication of series with high mortality, amputation, and aortic disruption rates. A positive preoperative blood culture is the best predictor of mortality with increased amputation rates due to infection of the extra-anatomic bypass. Therefore, in selected cases with sepsis, a prudent management protocol is required. We report a 68-yr-old male presenting with a chronic primary aortoduodenal fistula extensively involving the duodenum and Gram-negative sepsis. We planned a staged operation. Initially, an emergency laparotomy and control of the aorta allowed stabilization of the patient, identification of the fistula, and direct in situ placement of the prosthetic graft followed by an en bloc resection of the aneurysm and the surrounding structures. After he recovered from sepsis and had been stabilized, a staged extra-anatomic bypass followed by transabdominal removal of the temporarily placed graft was done. This management plan will allow the highest success rate and may be a prudent management protocol for these difficult cases.
Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications/*pathology/*surgery ; Chronic Disease ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Duodenum/pathology ; Human ; Intestinal Fistula/complications/*pathology/*surgery ; Male ; Sepsis/*complications ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUNDInflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) are rare but distinct clinical entities of atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms (aAAAs). In this study we report a 20-year single institution experience for IAAA and analyze their clinical features and long term outcome in comparison with aAAA.

METHODSBetween 1988 and 2008, 412 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) underwent elective surgical operations, 11 (2.7%) of whom were diagnosed as IAAAs and 389 (94.4%) were diagnosed as aAAAs. The former group was matched in a case control fashion to a group of 33 patients with aAAAs having similar characteristics of age, gender, and preoperative risk factors. All available clinical, pathologic, and postoperative variables were retrospectively reviewed, and the two groups were compared.

RESULTSThe two groups did not differ significantly in clinical characteristics and preoperative risk factors, although patients with IAAAs were significantly more symptomatic (100% vs. 42.4%, P = 0.001) and had larger aneurysms on admission ((7.4 +/- 0.7) cm vs. (6.3 +/- 0.9) cm, P = 0.006). In IAAAs, the preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate was found to be significantly elevated compared to aAAA group ((44.5 +/- 9.1) mm/h vs. (11.4 +/- 5.4) mm/h, P < 0.05). Surgical morbidity and mortality rates did not differ between the two groups. The operation time for patients with IAAAs was significantly longer than that for patients with aAAAs ((308 +/- 36) minutes vs. (224 +/- 46) minutes, P < 0.05), but the cross-clamp time was similar in both groups ((41.5 +/- 6.2) minutes vs. (41.8 +/- 6.2) minutes, P = 0.92). A five-year survival rate analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.711).

CONCLUSIONSDespite having more symptoms, larger size and longer operation time, patients with IAAA can now be treated with approaches that cause low morbidity and mortality, similar to patients with aAAA. Long term outcome of IAAA patients is of no difference from aAAA patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Atherosclerosis ; complications ; pathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation ; complications ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

In order to establish optimal management for aortoenteric fistula (AEF) the records of five patients treated for AEF (four aortoduodenal and one aortogastric fistula) were retrospectively reviewed. The arterial reconstruction procedures were selected according to the surgical findings, underlying cause, and patient status. In situ aortic reconstructions with prosthetic grafts were performed on three patients who had no gross findings of periaortic infection, whereas axillo-bifemoral bypass was carried out in the other two patients with periaortic purulence. In all patients, after retroperitoneal irrigation a pedicled omentum was used to cover the aortic graft or aortic stump. In the preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan there was a periaortic air shadow in four out of five patients. There was no surgical mortality or graft infection observed during a mean follow-up period of 40 months (range, 24-68 months). Therefore, the treatment results of an AEF can be improved using intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for rapid diagnosis and selection of an appropriate surgical procedure based on the surgical findings and underlying cause.
Aged ; Aorta, Abdominal/*pathology ; Aortic Aneurysm/surgery ; Aortic Diseases/*surgery ; Contrast Media/pharmacology ; Fistula/*surgery ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula/*surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVESTo review the dilatation of the proximal neck in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular repair (EVR), and to analyze the factors contributed to these changes.

METHODSFrom January 1997 to January 2007, a total of 45 patients treated by EVR met the inclusion criteria. There were 44 male and 1 female patients, with an average age of (69 ± 17) years. The patients were all asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm, combined hypertension in 37 cases, coronary heart disease in 40 cases. All the patients had the complete preoperative enhanced CT information, and accepted more than 6 months of regular enhanced CT follow-up (1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery and annually thereafter). The proximal aneurysm neck diameter increase was determined by CT, increase over 2 mm as having change, less than 2 mm as no change.

RESULTSThe average follow-up interval was (34 ± 25) months (ranging from 9 to 100 months). The mean preoperative proximal neck diameter was (21.5 ± 2.3) mm, and (22.4 ± 2.4) mm one month after operation and (24.0 ± 2.8) mm at the latest follow-up. The increase of proximal neck diameter was detected in 71.1%. The oversizing percentage was 19% ± 6%. The incidence of proximal neck over-sizing stent-graft in diameter was 6.7%. The incidence of no dilation at proximal neck diameter was 97.4%, 68.6%, 39.3% and 3.3% at 16, 24, 36 and 96 months postoperatively respectively. The stent-graft migration was detected in 22.2% patients, and the migration distance was (7.0 ± 1.3) mm (ranging from 0 to 9.5 mm). There were no case which the migration oversized 10 mm or need to reintervention.

CONCLUSIONSThe more oversizing percentage, the more dilatation in the proximal neck. The stent-graft migration and the dilatation of the proximal neck might have effect on each other.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; pathology ; surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Dilatation, Pathologic ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of the diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) on endovascular exclusion (EVE) and its results.

METHODSFrom March 1997 to June 2007, 429 AAA patients were treated with endovascular stent-graft exclusion. According to the maximal diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (diameter < 55 mm, n = 274) and group B (diameter > or = 55 mm, n = 155). The diameter of AAA, involvement of iliac artery, length, diameter and distortion of aneurismal neck in the two groups were recorded and compared retrospectively.

RESULTSPatients in group B were significantly older than group A (73.7 vs 71.1 years, P < 0.05). More patients in group B was complicated with coronary artery disease than those in group A (P < 0.05). The mean diameter of AAA in group A was (46.6 +/- 6.8) mm, and (66.8 +/- 11.2) mm in group B (P < 0.05). Proximal aneurysmal necks were shorter, wider and more tortuous in group B than those in group A (P < 0.05). Extraperitoneal approach, embolism of inner iliac artery and reconstruction of another inner iliac artery and stretch technique were more applied in group B. There were more endoleak during operation in group B and more stent-grafts were used. There was significant difference in morbidity rate between the two groups, while no statistic difference in mortality. And in group B, there were a high rate of endoleak and secondary intervention post operation.

CONCLUSIONSThe diameter of AAA affects EVE and its results. In small aneurysms, EVE carries better outcome than in big aneurysms.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; pathology ; surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome

Gastrointestinal complications (GI) after thoracoabdominal aortic repair can be classified as biliary disease, heptic dysfunction, pancreatitis, GI bleeding, peptic ulcer disease, bowel ischemia, paralytic ileus, and aortoenteric fistula. Theses complications are associated with high post operative morbidity and mortality. Most of the aortoenteric fistulae after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery are found at the duodenum, near the surgical site. These rare complications are caused by an indirect communication with abdominal aorta that originated from an aneursymal formation ruptured into the duodenum. Such aorto-duodenal fistula formation is considered as a result of inflammatory change from secondary infection near the surgical instruments. Herein, we report two cases of massive upper GI bleeding from aorto-duodenal fistulae and spontaneous lower GI perforation related to cytomegalovirus infection after abdominal aortic aneurysmal repair operations.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aorta, Abdominal/*surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications/*surgery ; Aortic Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/*complications/diagnosis/pathology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/virology ; Male ; Vascular Fistula/*diagnosis/surgery/virology

Gastrointestinal complications (GI) after thoracoabdominal aortic repair can be classified as biliary disease, heptic dysfunction, pancreatitis, GI bleeding, peptic ulcer disease, bowel ischemia, paralytic ileus, and aortoenteric fistula. Theses complications are associated with high post operative morbidity and mortality. Most of the aortoenteric fistulae after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery are found at the duodenum, near the surgical site. These rare complications are caused by an indirect communication with abdominal aorta that originated from an aneursymal formation ruptured into the duodenum. Such aorto-duodenal fistula formation is considered as a result of inflammatory change from secondary infection near the surgical instruments. Herein, we report two cases of massive upper GI bleeding from aorto-duodenal fistulae and spontaneous lower GI perforation related to cytomegalovirus infection after abdominal aortic aneurysmal repair operations.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aorta, Abdominal/*surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications/*surgery ; Aortic Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/*complications/diagnosis/pathology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology ; Humans ; Intestinal Fistula/*diagnosis/surgery/virology ; Intestinal Perforation/*diagnosis/virology ; Male ; Vascular Fistula/*diagnosis/surgery/virology