1.Opioid Treatment and Excessive Alcohol Consumption Are Associated With Esophagogastric Junction Disorders
Valeria SCHINDLER ; Daniel RUNGGALDIER ; Amanda BIANCA ; Anton S BECKER ; Fritz MURRAY ; Edoardo SAVARINO ; Daniel POHL
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2019;25(2):205-211
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influence of external factors such as opioids and alcohol has been extensively investigated for various segments of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the association between their use and the development of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction disorders (EGJOODs) is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze prevalence and clinical relevance of opioids and alcohol intake in patients with EGJOODs. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed clinical and pharmacological data of 375 consecutive patients who had undergone high resolution impedance manometry for EGJOODs. EGJOODs were classified according to the Chicago classification version 3.0 and to recently published normal values for test meals. Demographics, manometric data, and symptoms were compared between different groups using Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariate analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: EGJOOD was found in 30.7% (115/375) of all analyzed patients. The prevalence of opioids (14.8% vs 4.2%, P = 0.026) was significantly higher in patients with EGJOODs compared to patients without EGJOODs. Additionally, excessive alcohol consumption (12.2% vs 3.5%, P = 0.011) was associated with EGJOODs. Excessive alcohol consumption was especially frequent in the non-achalasia esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction subgroup (16.2%) and opioid use in the achalasia type III subgroup (20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant association between EGJOODs and opioid as well as excessive alcohol consumption. This underlines the importance of detailed history taking regarding medication and ethanol consumption in patients with dysphagia. Further prospective studies on mechanisms undelaying esophagogastric junction dysfunction due to opioids or alcohol are warranted.
Alcohol Drinking
;
Analgesics, Opioid
;
Classification
;
Deglutition Disorders
;
Demography
;
Electric Impedance
;
Esophageal Achalasia
;
Esophagogastric Junction
;
Ethanol
;
Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Humans
;
Manometry
;
Meals
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Prevalence
;
Prospective Studies
;
Reference Values
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Nutrient Challenge Testing Is Not Equivalent toScintigraphy−Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Testing inDiagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
Valeria SCHINDLER ; Martin HUELLNER ; Fritz MURRAY ; Larissa SCHNURRE ; Anton S BECKER ; Valentine BORDIER ; Daniel POHL
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2020;26(4):514-520
Background/Aims:
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a common condition in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Recently, a combined scintigraphy–lactulose hydrogen breath test (ScLHBT) was described as an accurate tool diagnosing SIBO. We aim to analyze whether a lactulose nutrient challenge test (NCT), previously shown to separate DGBI from healthy volunteers, is equivalent to ScLHBT in diagnosing SIBO.
Methods:
We studied data of 81 DGBI patients undergoing ScLHBT with 30 g lactulose and 300 mL water as well as NCT with 30 g lactulose and a 400 mL liquid test meal. Differences in proportion of positive SIBO diagnoses according to specified cecal load and time criteria for NCT and ScLHBT, respectively, were tested in an equivalence trial. An odds ratio (OR) range of 0.80-1.25 was considered equivalent.
Results:
Diagnosis of SIBO during NCT was not equivalent to SIBO diagnosis in ScLHBT, considering a hydrogen increase before cecal load of 5.0%, 7.5%, or 10.0%, respectively ([OR, 3.76; 90% CI, 1.99-7.09], [OR, 1.87; 90% CI, 1.06-3.27], and [OR, 1.11; 90% CI, 0.65-1.89]). Considering only time to hydrogen increase as criterion, the odds of a positive SIBO diagnosis in the NCT (0.65) was lower than in ScLHBT (1.70) (OR, 0.38; 90% CI, 0.23-0.65).
Conclusions
This study could not show an equivalence of NCT and ScLHBT in diagnosing SIBO. A possible explanation might be the different transit times owing to unequal testing substances. The effect of this deviation in relation to consecutive therapy regimens should be tested in further prospective studies.
3.Assessment of Cervical Cancer with a Parameter-Free Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging Algorithm.
Anton S BECKER ; Jose A PERUCHO ; Moritz C WURNIG ; Andreas BOSS ; Soleen GHAFOOR ; Pek Lan KHONG ; Elaine Y P LEE
Korean Journal of Radiology 2017;18(3):510-518
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a parameter-free intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) approach in cervical cancer, to assess the optimal b-value threshold, and to preliminarily examine differences in the derived perfusion and diffusion parameters for different histological cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 19 female patients (mean age, 54 years; age range, 37–78 years) gave consent and were enrolled in this prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Clinical staging and biopsy results were obtained. Echo-planar diffusion weighted sequences at 13 b-values were acquired at 3 tesla field strength. Single-sliced region-of-interest IVIM analysis with adaptive b-value thresholds was applied to each tumor, yielding the optimal fit and the optimal parameters for pseudodiffusion (D*), perfusion fraction (F(p)) and diffusion coefficient (D). Monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated for comparison with D. RESULTS: Biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 10 patients and adenocarcinoma in 9. The b-value threshold (median [interquartile range]) depended on the histological type and was 35 (22.5–50) s/mm² in squamous cell carcinoma and 150 (100–150) s/mm² in adenocarcinoma (p < 0.05). Comparing squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma, D* (45.1 [25.1–60.4] × 10⁻³ mm²/s vs. 12.4 [10.5–21.2] × 10⁻³ mm²/s) and F(p) (7.5% [7.0–9.0%] vs. 9.9% [9.0–11.4%]) differed significantly between the subtypes (p < 0.02), whereas D did not (0.89 [0.75–0.94] × 10⁻³ mm²/s vs. 0.90 [0.82–0.97] × 10⁻³ mm²/s, p = 0.27). The residuals did not differ (0.74 [0.60–0.92] vs. 0.94 [0.67–1.01], p = 0.32). The ADC systematically underestimated the magnitude of diffusion restriction compared to D (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The parameter-free IVIM approach is feasible in cervical cancer. The b-value threshold and perfusion-related parameters depend on the tumor histology type.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Biopsy
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Diffusion
;
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Epithelial Cells
;
Ethics Committees, Research
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Perfusion
;
Perfusion Imaging
;
Prospective Studies
;
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*