Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently used to treat obesity and metabolic syndrome. It is however technically challenging with a steep learning curve and long operating times. Laparoscopitc mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) is another surgical method that is acclaimed to achieve similar efficacy and yet safe with acceptable complication rates. We reviewedcurrent literature on LMGB on its efficacy and safety profile. Comprehensive search of available literature using a combination of key words was performed, looking out for efficacy and safety end points. Efficacy end points include excess weight loss, change in body mass index (BMI), resolution of metabolic syndrome or T2DM remission. Safety end points include mortality and morbidity rates, short and long term complications. 18 studies were selected with a total of 9392 patients. Follow up range was from 1 year to 6 years with majority of studies achieving 57%-92% excess weight loss (%EWL) within 1 year. Remission of T2DM rates were mostly more than 84%. Several studies reported better %EWL and T2DM remission when compared to SG and RYGB. Overall mortality rate was 0.152%. Morbidity rates vary from 2.7%-12.5%. Some studies reported lower mortality and complication rates in LMGB when compared to SG and RYGB. In summary, MGB is a safe and effective metabolic-bariatric procedure in treating morbid obesity and T2DM. It should be considered an alternative to standard RYGB. Risk of bile reflux, marginal ulcer and anemia needs to be explained to the patient when counselling for such procedure.
Anemia ; Bile Reflux ; Body Mass Index ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastric Bypass* ; Humans ; Learning Curve ; Methods ; Mortality ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid* ; Peptic Ulcer ; Weight Loss

Introduction: As the first point of contact for those presenting with asthma symptoms, primary healthcare plays a crucial role in asthma management. This is a nationwide study of assessment of asthma symptom control and adherence to asthma medication among outpatients in public health clinics in Malaysia. Methods: This is a prospective, observational multicentre study (ASCOPE; NCT03804632). Data on asthma control, assessment of control symptoms, and adherence to treatment were collected from medical records and interviews of patients. The level of asthma control was assessed using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Assessment of Symptom Control. Adherence of patient to medication for asthma was assessed through interview of patients using four questions adapted from the Malaysian Medication Adherence Scale. Results: Among the 1011 patients recruited, 416 (41%) had well controlled asthma, 388 (38%) were partly controlled, and 207 (21%) had uncontrolled asthma. Majority (81%) had mild asthma and all patients were on asthma medication. Most patients did not have spirometry data (97%) but underwent peak flow rate measurements (98%). Poor adherence occurred at all levels of asthma control but was worst among those with uncontrolled asthma. This was statistically significant across all four questions on adherence (p<0.05). For example, more patients with uncontrolled asthma forgot doses (56%) or stopped treatment (39%) than those with well-controlled asthma (44% and 27% respectively). Conclusions: Among Malaysian primary care patients with asthma, less than 50% had well-controlled asthma, and low adherence to treatment was common. More effort is needed to improve asthma control among patients in Malaysia, including those with mild asthma.