Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different medical treatment in advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma. Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective clinical study. Fifty-five advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma patients treated in Sun-Yat Sen University Cancer Center from January 2005 to August 2020 were enrolled. There were 34 patients who received first-line doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (doxorubicin group), 12 patients received first-line doxorubicin or liposome doxorubicin plus paclitaxel or albumin bound paclitaxel chemotherapy (combination therapy group), and 4 patients received first-line paclitaxel-based treatment (paclitaxel group). There were 6 patients who received anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy, another 2 patients received anti-PD-1 antibody plus anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy plus targeted therapy included 5 cases of first-line therapy and 3 cases of second-line therapy. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by RECIST 1.1 standard. The adverse reactions were evaluated by CTCAE4.0 standard. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was evaluated with Log rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the influencing factors. Results: There were 18 patients achieved partial response (PR) in 34 patients in the doxorubicin group, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.5 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was 15 months. Four patients achieved PR in 12 patients in the combination therapy group, mPFS and mOS were 4 months and 19 months. Two patients achieved PR in 4 patients in the paclitaxel group, mPFS and mOS were 3 months and 9 months. However, only 1 in 6 patients achieved PR for anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy, mPFS and mOS were 3 months and 16 months. Two patients who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy acquired PR for 17 months and more than 16 months. Median PFS (7.5 months) were longer in those with primary liver, lung and spleen angiosarcoma than in those with other primary site (3.0 months, P=0.028). The mOS (20 months) was longer in females than that in males (12 months, P=0.045). Primary tumor site, sex, age and treatment were not independent prognostic factors for angiosarcoma patients (P>0.05). Grade 3-4 cardiac toxicity was found in 2 patients in the combination therapy group. Conclusions: Doxorubicin-based and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy are the most important treatment for advanced angiosarcoma. Potential efficacy for targeted therapy combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy are showed in some patients with long duration of response and moderate adverse event.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Hemangiosarcoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Paclitaxel/adverse effects* ; Doxorubicin/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects*

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib plus irinotecan in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This prospective phase 1/2 study was conducted in 2 centers in China (Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Province Hospital). We enrolled patients with mCRC whose disease had progressed after first-line systemic therapy and had not previously treated with irinotecan to receive anlotinib plus irinotecan. In the phase 1 of the trial, patients received anlotinib (8 mg, 10 mg or 12 mg, po, 2 weeks on/1 week off) in combination with fixed-dose irinotecan (180 mg/m(2), iv, q2w) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the phase 2, patients were treated with the RP2D of anlotinib and irinotecan. The primary endpoints were MTD and objective response rate (ORR). Results: From May 2018 to January 2020, a total of 31 patients with mCRC were enrolled. Anlotinib was well tolerated in combination with irinotecan with no MTD identified in the phase 1, and the RP2D was 12 mg. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Eight patients achieved partial response, and 21 had stable disease, 1 had progressive disease. The ORR was 25.8% and the disease control rate was 93.5%. With a median follow-up duration of 29.5 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 months (95% CI: 3.7, 9.3) and 17.6 months (95% CI: 12.4, not evaluated), respectively. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (25.8%) and diarrhea (16.1%). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusion: The combination of anlotinib and irinotecan has promising anti-tumor activity in the second-line treatment of mCRC with a manageable safety profile.
Humans ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology* ; Indoles/therapeutic use* ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use* ; Prospective Studies

Objective: To explore the application and efficacy of paclitaxel liposome in the treatment of advanced breast cancer among Chinese population in the real world. Methods: The clinical characteristics of patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome as salvage treatment from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2019 in 11 hospitals were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression model were used for the multivariate analysis. Results: Among 647 patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome, the first-line treatment accounted for 43.3% (280/647), the second-line treatment accounted for 27.7% (179/647), and the third-line and above treatment accounted for 29.1% (188/647). The median dose of first-line and second-line treatment was 260 mg per cycle, and 240 mg in third line and above treatment. The median period of paclitaxel liposome alone and combined chemotherapy or targeted therapy is 4 cycles and 6 cycles, respectively. In the whole group, 167 patients (25.8%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with capecitabine±trastuzumab (TX±H), 123 patients (19.0%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome alone (T), and 119 patients (18.4%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with platinum ± trastuzumab (TP±H), 108 patients (16.7%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with trastuzumab ± pertuzumab (TH±P). The median PFS of first-line and second-line patients (5.5 and 5.5 months, respectively) were longer than that of patients treated with third line and above (4.9 months, P<0.05); The ORR of the first line, second line, third line and above patients were 46.7%, 36.8% and 28.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that event-free survival (EFS) and the number of treatment lines were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The common adverse events were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, hand foot syndrome and abnormal liver function. Conclusion: Paclitaxel liposomes is widely used and has promising efficacy in multi-subtype advanced breast cancer.
Humans ; Female ; Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced* ; Paclitaxel/adverse effects* ; Liposomes/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Trastuzumab/therapeutic use* ; Capecitabine/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects*

Oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX) has become the standard treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. Among known toxicities induced by oxaliplatin, hematological, gastrointestinal and neurological toxicities are common. However, acute pulmonary toxicity associated with oxaliplatin is unusual. One case of interstitial lung disease associated with the FOLFOX protocol is reported here.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Fluorouracil/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leucovorin/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/chemically induced/*etiology/radiography ; Male ; Organoplatinum Compounds/*adverse effects/therapeutic use

Oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX) has become the standard treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. Among known toxicities induced by oxaliplatin, hematological, gastrointestinal and neurological toxicities are common. However, acute pulmonary toxicity associated with oxaliplatin is unusual. One case of interstitial lung disease associated with the FOLFOX protocol is reported here.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Fluorouracil/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leucovorin/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Lung Diseases, Interstitial/chemically induced/*etiology/radiography ; Male ; Organoplatinum Compounds/*adverse effects/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDGastric cancer is one of the most common types of malignant tumors in China and East Asia and has the highest mortality rate of the malignant gastrointestinal tumors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a systemic or local chemotherapy that is given prior to the local treatment of malignant tumors. Neoadjuvant therapy is currently showing some positive prospects; however, its clinical effects remain controversial. In this study, we used the modified FOLFOX7 (mFOLFOX7) regimen as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Perioperative clinical and pathological efficacy, toxicity, effects of surgery, postoperative observation, and prognosis were studied to investigate its clinical efficacy and safety.

METHODSEighty patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated in our surgery department from 2005 to 2009; 38 of these patients received mFOLFOX7 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the other 42 patients assigned to the control group. The perioperative effects of mFOLFOX7 chemotherapy, including clinical effects and toxicity, were observed in each patient.

RESULTSAfter mFOLFOX7 chemotherapy, clinical and pathologic stages decreased in 21.1% and 36.8% of the patients, respectively, but the results were not statistically significant (P = 0.129). The clinical response rate was 50% (19/38). Toxicity was mild; most adverse events were grade I or II and involved no severe infections or deaths. Compared with the control group, the radical resection rate increased (92.1% vs. 85.7%; P = 0.437); surgical effects were completed without an increased incidence of perioperative complications. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 78.70%, 57.40%, and 51.66%, respectively, in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 78.57%, 56.87%, and 43.16%, respectively, in the control group.

CONCLUSIONSThe mFOLFOX7 regimen was very effective and well-tolerated as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates in the mFOLFOX7 group were not significantly different from the control group.

Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Leucovorin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Stomach Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of modified FOLFOXIRI (combination of reducing dosage irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluorouracil) in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODA total of 53 patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving modified FOLFOXIRI regimen were recruited continuously from January 2010 to January 2014. Safety profile was recorded based on NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (NCI-CTCAE v3.0). Objective response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version1.1 (RECIST 1.1) after administration of at least 4 cycles chemotherapy. Kras and Braf gene sequencing was tested by dideoxy chain-termination method. Relation between efficacy and two genes was examined.

RESULTSAmong 53 patients, no treatment-related mortality was presented. The rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse event was 32.1% (17/53), including neutropenia 13.2%(7/53), anemia 11.3% (6/53) and fatigue 9.4% (5/53). Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were respectively 65.9% (29/44) and 90.0% (40/44). Radical resection rate (R0) was 29.5% (13/44). Efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI regimen plus targeting therapy was assessed in 44 patients. mFOLFOXIRI regimen plus targeting therapy achieved an ORR of 72.7% (8/11), which was higher than the ORR 65.9% (21/33) of triplet regimen alone, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.198). Paraffin specimens of 48 colorectal cancer cases were tested. Twenty-one cases were Kras mutant (43.75%), 3 cases were Braf mutant (6.25%). There were no significant differences between two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONReducing dosage mFOLFOXIRI can be safely used in advanced colorectal cancer and can achieve promising results in terms of short term efficacy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; China ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Humans ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Feasibility Studies ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects* ; Dexamethasone/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEWhether gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine or platinum single-agent chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still in dispute, and the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combining platinum chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

METHODSWe searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from VIP, CBM, CNKI, the Cochrane library, PUBMED and EMBASE. We traced the related references and experts in this field and communicated with other authors to obtain the information that has not been found. We made quality assessment of qualified RCTs assessed by the exclusion and inclusion criteria and used RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration to perform meta-analysis.

RESULTSFour RCTs were eligible and included 984 patients. Meta analysis results suggested that: compared with gecitabine single-agent chemotherapy, the combination had a statistically significant benefit in increasing the response rate (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.79-6.05, P = 0.000 1) and 2-year survival rate (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.45-7.12, P = 0.004) while increased the risk of the incidence of adverse reactions, especially the grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 8.16, 95% CI: 1.71-39.07, P = 0.009); compared with cisplatin single-agent chemotherapy, the combination had a statistically significant benefit in increasing the response rate (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 2.20-5.60, P < 0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.41, P = 0.006) while increased the risk of the incidence of adverse reactions, especially the grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (OR = 28.55, 95% CI: 14.06-57.04, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONCompared with single-agent chemotherapy, the combining can significantly improve the efficiency and survival rate while increase the toxicity rare. The results still need to be proved by high quality RCTs.

Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Deoxycytidine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Platinum ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects* ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immunoconjugates/adverse effects* ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy* ; Rituximab/adverse effects*