Humans ; SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19 ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use*

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused global public health and economic crises. Thus, new therapeutic strategies and effective vaccines are urgently needed to cope with this severe pandemic. The development of a broadly neutralizing antibody against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is one of the attractive treatment strategies for COVID-19. Currently, the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein is the main target of neutralizing antibodies when SARS-CoV-2 enters human cells through an interaction between the S protein and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expressed on various human cells. A single monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment is prone to selective pressure due to increased possibility of targeted epitope mutation, leading to viral escape. In addition, the antibody-dependent enhancement effect is a potential risk of enhancing the viral infection. These risks can be reduced using multiple mAbs that target nonoverlapping epitopes. Thus, a cocktail therapy combining two or more antibodies that recognize different regions of the viral surface may be the most effective therapeutic strategy.
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antibodies, Viral ; COVID-19 ; Humans ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute infectious disease caused by various enteroviruses. Recently, large HFMD outbreaks caused by enterovirus type 71 (EV71) have been frequently reported in China, posing great threats on children's health. There is no specific antiviral therapy for severe HFMD, and patient management mainly depends on supportive and symptomatic treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a pharmaceutical preparation of human IgG that is pooled from thousands of healthy blood donors, and contained neutralization antibodies against various enteroviruses, including EV71. IVIG therapy should be carefully administrated for severe HFMD considering its role on passive immunization against EV71 and immune regulation.
Antibodies, Neutralizing ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Viral ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Enterovirus A, Human ; immunology ; Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease ; therapy ; virology ; Humans ; Immunization, Passive ; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous ; immunology ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a boost dose of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) among children aged 18 months who had been administered with primary doses of IPV.

METHODSForm 2011 to 2012, a total of 97 children were enrolled in the present study who were vaccinated with IPV at 2, 3, 4 months of age and boosted with the same vaccine at 18 months of age. Anti-poliovirus neutralizing antibody titers in serum were measured before and after booster vaccination, geometric mean titers (GMT) and seroprotection rate were calculated. Adverse events occurring within 30 days after booster vaccination were observed, including pain, redness/swelling and induration at the injection site, fever, vomit, abnormal crying, drowsiness, loss of appetite, irritability, and all other physical discomfort and related medications were also recorded. A descriptive analysis was performed for the safety assessment.

RESULTSImmunogenicity was assessed in 84 subjects. The pre-booster seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibody against poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 before booster were all 100% (84/84) and the corresponding GMT (95% CI) was 1: 148.5 (116.49-189.29) , 1: 237.68 (178.39-316.67) and 1: 231.87 (181.27-296.58) , respectively. The seropositivity rates of neutralizing antibody against the three types of poliovirus after booster were all 100% (84/84) and the corresponding GMT (95% CI) was 1: 1612.14 (1470.57-1767.34) , 1: 1854.92 (1715.83-2005.29) and 1: 1625.50 (1452.12-1819.58) , respectively. The pre-booster titer of neutralizing antibody against poliovirus type 1, 2, 3 mainly ranged 1: 128-1: 512, which accounted for 65% (55/84) , 55% (46/84) , 74% (62/84) in each type. After the booster immunization, titers of neutralizing antibody against type 1, 2, 3 were increased as subjects with titer ≥ 1: 1024 accounted for 94% (78/84) , 95% (80/84) , 92% (77/84) , respectively.Safety was evaluated in 96 subjects, of which 16 subjects reported adverse events with the rate of 17%. The observed local events were mainly tenderness 3% (3/96) , redness/swelling and induration were not reported. The systemic adverse events included loss of appetite (8%, 8/96) , irritability (8%, 8/96) , fever (7%, 7/96) , abnormal crying (6%, 6/96) , drowsiness (6%, 6/96) and vomit (1%, 1/96) . All reported adverse events were mild or moderate. All of the local events occurred in the day of vaccination and lasted for 1-2 days, while systemic events almost developed within 2 days after vaccination and last less than 3 days.

CONCLUSIONIPV booster dose has good immunogenicity and safety profile, which provides effective protection against poliovirus.

Antibodies, Neutralizing ; blood ; Antibodies, Viral ; blood ; China ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization, Secondary ; adverse effects ; Infant ; Male ; Poliomyelitis ; prevention & control ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated ; adverse effects ; immunology ; therapeutic use

The raging global epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only poses a major threat to public health, but also has a huge impact on the global health care system and social and economic development. Therefore, accelerating the development of vaccines and antibody drugs to provide people with effective protection and treatment measures has become the top priority of researchers and medical institutions in the field. At present, several vaccines and antibody drugs targeting SARS-Cov-2 have been in the stage of clinical research or approved for marketing around the world. In this manuscript, we summarized the vaccines and antibody drugs which apply genetic engineering technologies to target spike protein, including subunit vaccines, viral vector vaccines, DNA vaccines, mRNA vaccines, and several neutralizing antibody drugs, and discussed the trends of vaccines and antibody drugs in the future.
Humans ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; Antibodies, Viral ; Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Neutralizing

The epidemic of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 and its variants of concern (VOCs) has been ongoing for over 3 years. Antibody therapies encompassing convalescent plasma, hyperimmunoglobulin, and neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) applied in passive immunotherapy have yielded positive outcomes and played a crucial role in the early COVID-19 treatment. In this review, the development path, action mechanism, clinical research results, challenges, and safety profile associated with the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma, hyperimmunoglobulin, and mAbs were summarized. In addition, the prospects of applying antibody therapy against VOCs was assessed, offering insights into the coping strategies for facing new infectious disease outbreaks.
Humans ; Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use* ; Communicable Diseases, Emerging/drug therapy* ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment ; COVID-19/therapy* ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Antibodies, Neutralizing

BACKGROUND: The new emerging avian influenza A H7N9 virus, causing severe human infection with a mortality rate of around 41%. This study aims to provide a novel treatment option for the prevention and control of H7N9. METHODS: H7 hemagglutinin (HA)-specific B cells were isolated from peripheral blood plasma cells of the patients previously infected by H7N9 in Jiangsu Province, China. The human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were generated by amplification and cloning of these HA-specific B cells. First, all human mAbs were screened for binding activity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Then, those mAbs, exhibiting potent affinity to recognize H7 HAs were further evaluated by hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) and microneutralization in vitro assays. Finally, the lead mAb candidate was selected and tested against the lethal challenge of the H7N9 virus using murine models. RESULTS: The mAb 6-137 was able to recognize a panel of H7 HAs with high affinity but not HA of other subtypes, including H1N1 and H3N2. The mAb 6-137 can efficiently inhibit the HA activity in the inactivated H7N9 virus and neutralize 100 tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) of H7N9 virus (influenza A/Nanjing/1/2013) in vitro, with neutralizing activity as low as 78 ng/mL. In addition, the mAb 6-137 protected the mice against the lethal challenge of H7N9 prophylactically and therapeutically. CONCLUSION The mAb 6-137 could be an effective antibody as a prophylactic or therapeutic biological treatment for the H7N9 exposure or infection.
Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use* ; Antibodies, Viral ; Hemagglutinins ; Humans ; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ; Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype ; Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype ; Influenza Vaccines ; Influenza in Birds ; Influenza, Human/prevention & control* ; Mice

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of interleukin-6 (IL-6) on the chemosensitivity of drug-resistant multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines to bortezomib (BTZ) and its mechanism. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were collected from patients with BTZ-resistant MM before and after treatment. Human MM cell lines KM3 and KM3/BTZ were cultured in vitro. ELISA was used to detect the content of IL-6 in peripheral blood of MM patients, KM3 and KM3/BTZ cells. CCK-8 assay was used to detect the drug sensitivity of KM3 and KM3 / BTZ cells to BTZ. KM3 / BTZ cells were divided into KM3/BTZ control group (normal culture for 48 h), IL-6 neutralizing antibody Anti-IL-6 group (500 ng/ml Anti-IL-6 treated for 48 h), BTZ group (300 ng/ml BTZ treated for 48 h), BTZ + Anti-IL-6 group (300 ng/ml BTZ and 500 ng/ml Anti-IL-6 treated for 48 h). The proliferation activity of KM3 / BTZ cells was detected by CCK-8 assay. The cell cycle distribution of KM3/BTZ cells was detected by flow cytometry. The apoptosis of KM3/BTZ cells was detected by Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining. The mRNA expression levels of IL-6, Notch1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in KM3/BTZ cells were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), and the protein expression levels of IL-6, Notch1, STAT3 in KM3/BTZ cells were detected by Western blot. RESULTS: The level of IL-6 in peripheral blood of patients with BTZ-resistant MM after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment (P<0.05). The level of IL-6 in KM3/BTZ cells was significantly higher than that in KM3 cells (P<0.05). The sensitivity of KM3/BTZ cells to BTZ was significantly lower than that of KM3 cells (P<0.05), and the resistance index (RI) was 19.62. Anti-IL-6 and BTZ could inhibit the proliferation of KM3 / BTZ cells, block cell cycle, and induce apoptosis (P<0.05). Compared with single drug treatment, the combined effect of Anti-IL-6 and BTZ was more obvious on KM3/BTZ cells (P<0.05), and significantly down regulated the mRNA and protein expression of IL-6, Notch1 and STAT3 in KM3/BTZ cells (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Antagonizing IL-6 can increase the chemosensitivity of MM cells to BTZ, and IL-6 may reduce the sensitivity of MM cells to BTZ through STAT3/Notch signaling pathway.
Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use* ; Apoptosis ; Bortezomib/therapeutic use* ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Proliferation ; Humans ; Interleukin-6/metabolism* ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; RNA, Messenger ; STAT3 Transcription Factor/metabolism* ; Signal Transduction ; Sincalide/therapeutic use*

The pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus type one (HIV-1), the major etiologic agent of acquired immunodeficiency disease (AIDS), has led to over 33 million people living with the virus, among which 18 million are women and children. Until now, there is neither an effective vaccine nor a therapeutic cure despite over 30 years of efforts. Although the Thai RV144 vaccine trial has demonstrated an efficacy of 31.2%, an effective vaccine will likely rely on a breakthrough discovery of immunogens to elicit broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies, which may take years to achieve. Therefore, there is an urgency of exploring other prophylactic strategies. Recently, antiretroviral treatment as prevention is an exciting area of progress in HIV-1 research. Although effective, the implementation of such strategy faces great financial, political and social challenges in heavily affected regions such as developing countries where drug resistant viruses have already been found with growing incidence. Activating latently infected cells for therapeutic cure is another area of challenge. Since it is greatly difficult to eradicate HIV-1 after the establishment of viral latency, it is necessary to investigate strategies that may close the door to HIV-1. Here, we review studies on non-vaccine strategies in targeting viral entry, which may have critical implications for HIV-1 prevention.
AIDS Vaccines ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; immunology ; therapeutic use ; Genetic Therapy ; HIV Infections ; drug therapy ; prevention & control ; HIV-1 ; drug effects ; immunology ; physiology ; Humans ; Peptides ; chemistry ; immunology ; Small Molecule Libraries ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Virus Internalization ; drug effects

OBJECTIVETo investigate the relationship of virological breakthrough and production of neutralizing anti-interferon antibody (NAb) in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha).

METHODFour hundred eighty-five patients with histological proven chronic hepatitis B were treated with 5 MU recombinant interferon-alpha 1b (rIFN-alpha1b) thrice weekly for 6-37 months (median 10). Serum HBV DNA, HBeAg and NAb levels of the patients were detected by fluorescent-quantitative PCR, enzymoimmunoassay and antiviral neutralizing biological assay respectively during the therapy.

RESULTSVirological breakthrough occurred in 66 patients (13.6%), and NAb was found in 98 patients (20.2%) of the total 485 patients. The rate of NAb positivity was higher in patients with viral breakthrough than those without it (68.2%, 45/66, vs 12.6%, 53/419, chi(2)=109.06, P < 0.01), and viral breakthrough occurred more in patients with positive NAb than with negative NAb (45.9%, 45/98, vs 5.4%, 21/387, chi(2)=109.06, P < 0.01). The time of the viral breakthrough occurrence and the time of NAb production had a significant correlation (P < 0.01). The occurrence of viral breakthrough was also influenced by the age of patients (P < 0.05) and HBeAg status (P < 0.01) before they were treated.

CONCLUSIONViral breakthrough occurred in 13.6% of our 485 chronic hepatitis B patients treated with recombinant interferon-alpha. Their viral breakthrough and production of NAb production had a significant correlation.

Adult ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; biosynthesis ; Female ; Hepatitis B Antibodies ; biosynthesis ; Hepatitis B virus ; immunology ; Hepatitis B, Chronic ; drug therapy ; virology ; Humans ; Interferon Type I ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Recombinant Proteins ; Young Adult