2.Association Between Prophylactic Antibiotic Use and Surgical Site Infection Based on Quality Assessment Data in Korea.
Kyoung Hoon KIM ; Choon Seon PARK ; Jin Hee CHANG ; Nam Soon KIM ; Jin Seo LEE ; Bo Ram CHOI ; Byung Ran LEE ; Kyoo Duck LEE ; Sun Min KIM ; Seon A YEOM
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2010;43(3):235-244
OBJECTIVES: To examine the prophylactic antibiotic use in reducing surgical site infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study for patients aged 18 years and older who underwent gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, cesarean section and hysterectomy. The data source was quality assessment data of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service gathered from medical records of 302 national hospitals. Prophylactic antibiotic use was defined as: timely antibiotic administration or inappropriate antibiotic selection. We performed hierarchical logistic regression to examine the association between prophylactic antibiotic use and surgical site infection with adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 16 348 patients (1588 gastrectomies, 2327 cholecystectomies, 1,384 colectomies, 3977 hysterectomies and 7072 cesarean sections) and surgical site infection was identified in 351 (2.1%) patients. The rates of timely antibiotic administration and inappropriate antibiotic selection varied according to procedures. Cholecystectomy patients who received timely prophylactic antibiotic had a significantly reduced risk of surgical site infection compared with those who did not receive a timely prophylactic antibiotics (OR 0.64, 95% CI=0.50-0.83), but no significant reduction was observed for other procedures. When inappropriate prophylactic antibiotics were given, the risk of surgical site infection significantly increased: 8.26-fold (95% CI=4.34-15.7) for gastrectomy, 4.73-fold (95% CI=2.09-10.7) for colectomy, 2.34-fold (95% CI=1.14-4.80) for cesarean section, 4.03-fold (95% CI=1.93-8.42) for hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study examines the association among timely antibiotic administration, inappropriate antibiotic selection and surgical site infection. Patients who received timely and appropriate antibiotics had a decreased risk of surgical site infection. Efforts to improve the timing of antibiotic administration and use of appropriate antibiotic are needed to lower the risk of surgical site infection.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*standards
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
*Quality Indicators, Health Care
;
Republic of Korea
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Surgical Wound Infection/*prevention & control
;
Young Adult
3.Evidence-Based Guidelines for Empirical Therapy of Neutropenic Fever in Korea.
Dong Gun LEE ; Sung Han KIM ; Soo Young KIM ; Chung Jong KIM ; Wan Beom PARK ; Young Goo SONG ; Jung Hyun CHOI
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;26(2):220-252
Neutrophils play an important role in immunological function. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to infection, and except fever is present, inflammatory reactions are scarce in many cases. Additionally, because infections can worsen rapidly, early evaluation and treatments are especially important in febrile neutropenic patients. In cases in which febrile neutropenia is anticipated due to anticancer chemotherapy, antibiotic prophylaxis can be used, based on the risk of infection. Antifungal prophylaxis may also be considered if long-term neutropenia or mucosal damage is expected. When fever is observed in patients suspected to have neutropenia, an adequate physical examination and blood and sputum cultures should be performed. Initial antibiotics should be chosen by considering the risk of complications following the infection; if the risk is low, oral antibiotics can be used. For initial intravenous antibiotics, monotherapy with a broad-spectrum antibiotic or combination therapy with two antibiotics is recommended. At 3-5 days after beginning the initial antibiotic therapy, the condition of the patient is assessed again to determine whether the fever has subsided or symptoms have worsened. If the patient's condition has improved, intravenous antibiotics can be replaced with oral antibiotics; if the condition has deteriorated, a change of antibiotics or addition of antifungal agents should be considered. If the causative microorganism is identified, initial antimicrobial or antifungal agents should be changed accordingly. When the cause is not detected, the initial agents should continue to be used until the neutrophil count recovers.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage
;
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/*standards
;
Antifungal Agents/*administration & dosage
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Fever/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology
;
Humans
;
Neutropenia/diagnosis/*drug therapy/etiology
;
Republic of Korea
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
4.Achieving 100 percent compliance to perioperative antibiotic administration: a quality improvement initiative.
Sui An LIE ; Kwang Yang Aaron LEE ; Meng Huat GOH ; Sudha HARIKRISHNAN ; Ruban POOPALALINGAM
Singapore medical journal 2019;60(3):130-135
INTRODUCTION:
Timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics within 60 minutes before surgical incision is important for reducing surgical site infections. This quality improvement initiative aimed to work towards achieving 100% compliance with perioperative antibiotic administration.
METHODS:
We examined the workflow in our Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) and proposed interventions using cause-and-effect analysis of anonymised anaesthetic records from eligible surgical cases extracted from AIMS. This ultimately led to the implementation of an antibiotic pop-up reminder. The overall process was done in a few small plan-do-study-act cycles involving raising awareness, education and reorganisation of AIMS before implementation of the antibiotic pop-up reminder. Data analysis took place from August 2014 to September 2016. Compliance was defined as documented antibiotic administration within 60 minutes before surgical incision, or as documented reason for omission.
RESULTS:
The median monthly compliance rate, for 33,038 cases before and 28,315 cases after the reminder was implemented, increased from 67.0% at baseline to 94.5%. This increase was consistent and sustained for a year despite frequent personnel turnover. Documentation of antibiotic administration also improved from 81.7% to 99.3%, allowing us to identify and address novel problems that were initially not apparent, and resulting in several department recommendations. These included administering antibiotics later for cases with predicted longer-than-expected preparation times and bringing forward antibiotic administration in lower-segment Caesarean sections.
CONCLUSION
The use of information technology and implementation of an antibiotic pop-up reminder on AIMS streamlined our work processes and brought us closer to achieving 100% on-time compliance with perioperative antibiotic administration.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
administration & dosage
;
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
;
methods
;
Documentation
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Electronic Health Records
;
Guideline Adherence
;
Humans
;
Perioperative Period
;
Quality Improvement
;
Reminder Systems
;
Software
;
Surgical Procedures, Operative
;
standards
;
Surgical Wound Infection
;
prevention & control