PURPOSE: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB), a diagnostic procedure to identify several hepatobiliary disorders, is considered safe with low incidence of associated complications. While postoperative monitoring guidelines are suggested for adults, selection of procedural recovery time for children remains at the discretion of individual operators. We aim to determine if differences exist in frequency of surgical complications, unplanned admissions, and healthcare cost for children undergoing outpatient PLB for cohorts with same-day vs. overnight observation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in children 1 month to 17 years of age undergoing ultrasound-guided PLB from January 2009 to August 2017 at a tertiary care, pediatric referral center. Cohorts were defined by postprocedural observation duration: same-day (≤8 hours) vs. overnight observation. Outcomes included surgical complications, medical interventions, unscheduled hospitalization within 7 days, and total encounter costs. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve children met study criteria of which 18 (16.1%) were assigned to same-day observation. No differences were noted in demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, biopsy indications, or preoperative coagulation profiles. No major complications or acute hospitalizations after PLB were observed. Administration of analgesia and fluid boluses were isolated and given within 8 hours. Compared to overnight monitoring, same-day observation accrued less total costs (US $992 less per encounter). CONCLUSION: Same-day observation after PLB in children appears well-tolerated with only minor interventions and complications observed within 8 hours of procedure. We recommend a targeted risk assessment prior to selection of observation duration. Same-day observation appears an appropriate recovery strategy in otherwise low-risk children undergoing outpatient PLB.
Adult ; Analgesia ; Biopsy ; Child ; Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Demography ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Incidence ; Liver ; Outpatients ; Referral and Consultation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Tertiary Healthcare

Purpose: The practice of withholding oral nutrition for children hospitalized for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol is not evidence based. We sought to characterize oral nutrition practices in this population and estimate the frequency of aspiration-related respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective, matched cohort study of children 3–17 years of age admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from Oct 2020 to May 2023 for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol. Cases provided oral nutrition were matched 1:2 to controls withheld nutrition by age and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute asthma severity classification. The primary outcome was aspiration-related respiratory failure defined as any respiratory support escalation following observed aspiration. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, pediatric asthma severity scores, adjunct asthma interventions, continuous albuterol duration, mortality, and length of stay. Results: Of 36 cases and 72 matched controls, the mean age was 9.1±3.9 years and 66.7% had moderate-severe persistent asthma. Cases and controls had comparable anthropometrics and admission pediatric asthma severity scores. No aspiration-related respiratory failure events were observed even among those receiving nutrition concurrent to noninvasive ventilation.Compared to controls, cases experienced a longer continuous albuterol duration (median:1.1 [interquartile range: 0.7–1.8] versus 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] days, p<0.001).No differences in length of stay, adjunct interventions, endotracheal intubation rates, and mortality were observed between cases and controls. Conclusion For children hospitalized for critical asthma, oral nutrition during continuous nebulized albuterol appeared well tolerated. While prospective validation is required, the practice of withholding oral nutrition for continuous albuterol administration may be unwarranted.

Purpose: The practice of withholding oral nutrition for children hospitalized for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol is not evidence based. We sought to characterize oral nutrition practices in this population and estimate the frequency of aspiration-related respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective, matched cohort study of children 3–17 years of age admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from Oct 2020 to May 2023 for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol. Cases provided oral nutrition were matched 1:2 to controls withheld nutrition by age and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute asthma severity classification. The primary outcome was aspiration-related respiratory failure defined as any respiratory support escalation following observed aspiration. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, pediatric asthma severity scores, adjunct asthma interventions, continuous albuterol duration, mortality, and length of stay. Results: Of 36 cases and 72 matched controls, the mean age was 9.1±3.9 years and 66.7% had moderate-severe persistent asthma. Cases and controls had comparable anthropometrics and admission pediatric asthma severity scores. No aspiration-related respiratory failure events were observed even among those receiving nutrition concurrent to noninvasive ventilation.Compared to controls, cases experienced a longer continuous albuterol duration (median:1.1 [interquartile range: 0.7–1.8] versus 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] days, p<0.001).No differences in length of stay, adjunct interventions, endotracheal intubation rates, and mortality were observed between cases and controls. Conclusion For children hospitalized for critical asthma, oral nutrition during continuous nebulized albuterol appeared well tolerated. While prospective validation is required, the practice of withholding oral nutrition for continuous albuterol administration may be unwarranted.

Purpose: The practice of withholding oral nutrition for children hospitalized for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol is not evidence based. We sought to characterize oral nutrition practices in this population and estimate the frequency of aspiration-related respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective, matched cohort study of children 3–17 years of age admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from Oct 2020 to May 2023 for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol. Cases provided oral nutrition were matched 1:2 to controls withheld nutrition by age and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute asthma severity classification. The primary outcome was aspiration-related respiratory failure defined as any respiratory support escalation following observed aspiration. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, pediatric asthma severity scores, adjunct asthma interventions, continuous albuterol duration, mortality, and length of stay. Results: Of 36 cases and 72 matched controls, the mean age was 9.1±3.9 years and 66.7% had moderate-severe persistent asthma. Cases and controls had comparable anthropometrics and admission pediatric asthma severity scores. No aspiration-related respiratory failure events were observed even among those receiving nutrition concurrent to noninvasive ventilation.Compared to controls, cases experienced a longer continuous albuterol duration (median:1.1 [interquartile range: 0.7–1.8] versus 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] days, p<0.001).No differences in length of stay, adjunct interventions, endotracheal intubation rates, and mortality were observed between cases and controls. Conclusion For children hospitalized for critical asthma, oral nutrition during continuous nebulized albuterol appeared well tolerated. While prospective validation is required, the practice of withholding oral nutrition for continuous albuterol administration may be unwarranted.

Purpose: The practice of withholding oral nutrition for children hospitalized for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol is not evidence based. We sought to characterize oral nutrition practices in this population and estimate the frequency of aspiration-related respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective, matched cohort study of children 3–17 years of age admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from Oct 2020 to May 2023 for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol. Cases provided oral nutrition were matched 1:2 to controls withheld nutrition by age and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute asthma severity classification. The primary outcome was aspiration-related respiratory failure defined as any respiratory support escalation following observed aspiration. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, pediatric asthma severity scores, adjunct asthma interventions, continuous albuterol duration, mortality, and length of stay. Results: Of 36 cases and 72 matched controls, the mean age was 9.1±3.9 years and 66.7% had moderate-severe persistent asthma. Cases and controls had comparable anthropometrics and admission pediatric asthma severity scores. No aspiration-related respiratory failure events were observed even among those receiving nutrition concurrent to noninvasive ventilation.Compared to controls, cases experienced a longer continuous albuterol duration (median:1.1 [interquartile range: 0.7–1.8] versus 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] days, p<0.001).No differences in length of stay, adjunct interventions, endotracheal intubation rates, and mortality were observed between cases and controls. Conclusion For children hospitalized for critical asthma, oral nutrition during continuous nebulized albuterol appeared well tolerated. While prospective validation is required, the practice of withholding oral nutrition for continuous albuterol administration may be unwarranted.

Purpose: The practice of withholding oral nutrition for children hospitalized for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol is not evidence based. We sought to characterize oral nutrition practices in this population and estimate the frequency of aspiration-related respiratory failure. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective, matched cohort study of children 3–17 years of age admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit from Oct 2020 to May 2023 for critical asthma receiving continuous albuterol. Cases provided oral nutrition were matched 1:2 to controls withheld nutrition by age and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute asthma severity classification. The primary outcome was aspiration-related respiratory failure defined as any respiratory support escalation following observed aspiration. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, pediatric asthma severity scores, adjunct asthma interventions, continuous albuterol duration, mortality, and length of stay. Results: Of 36 cases and 72 matched controls, the mean age was 9.1±3.9 years and 66.7% had moderate-severe persistent asthma. Cases and controls had comparable anthropometrics and admission pediatric asthma severity scores. No aspiration-related respiratory failure events were observed even among those receiving nutrition concurrent to noninvasive ventilation.Compared to controls, cases experienced a longer continuous albuterol duration (median:1.1 [interquartile range: 0.7–1.8] versus 0.7 [interquartile range: 0.3–1.3] days, p<0.001).No differences in length of stay, adjunct interventions, endotracheal intubation rates, and mortality were observed between cases and controls. Conclusion For children hospitalized for critical asthma, oral nutrition during continuous nebulized albuterol appeared well tolerated. While prospective validation is required, the practice of withholding oral nutrition for continuous albuterol administration may be unwarranted.