1.Orthopaedic Management of Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 1997;40(1):68-76
No abstract available.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
2.Clinical features of ankylosing spondylitis.
The Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association 1994;1(1):13-18
No abstract available.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
3.Ankylosing Spondylitis and Cardiac Abnormalities.
Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2012;20(1):23-24
No abstract available.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
4.Ankylosing Spondylitis and Cardiac Abnormalities.
Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2012;20(1):23-24
No abstract available.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
5.A clinical study of ankylosing spondylitis in Korean.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 1992;27(6):1594-1605
No abstract available.
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
6.Rehabilitation Therapy of Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 1997;40(1):77-85
No abstract available.
Rehabilitation*
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
7.Ankylosing Spondylitis and Woman.
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2012;19(4):171-172
No abstract available.
Female
;
Humans
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
8.Diagnostic significance of HLA typing in ankylosing spondylitis.
The Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association 1994;1(1):19-22
No abstract available.
Histocompatibility Testing*
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
9.Retraction: Development of osteoporosis and the imbalance of RANKL/OPG in ankylosing spondylitis.
Hae Rim KIM ; Ji Hyun HONG ; Dong Lim KIM ; Ho Youn KIM ; Sang Heon LEE
Korean Journal of Medicine 2007;73(3):349-349
No abstract available.
Osteoporosis*
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
10.Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab and Adalimumab in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2017;24(4):211-219
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and adalimumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with direct and indirect data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of efficacy and safety of secukinumab 75 mg, 150 mg and adalimumab 40 mg in patients with active AS. RESULTS: Five RCTs (1,483 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society response criteria of ≥20% (ASAS20) response rate was significantly higher in the adalimumab 40 mg (Odds ratio [OR], 4.26; 95% credible interval [CrI], 2.09~8.08), secukinumab 150 mg (OR, 3.35; 95% CrI, 1.73~6.56), and 75 mg dose (OR, 2.44; 95% CrI, 1.06~5.05) than with placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that adalimumab 40 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving an ASAS20 response (SUCRA=0.8753), followed by secukinumab 150 mg (SUCRA=0.7051), secukinumab 75 mg (SUCRA=0.4113), and placebo (SUCRA=0.0083). The ASAS40 response rate distribution pattern was similar to the ASAS20 response rate. However, the number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly among the treatment options. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab and adalimumab were effective for the treatment of active AS without causing a significant risk of serious adverse events.
Adalimumab*
;
Humans
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail