1.An unusual etiology of plummer-Vinson syndrome.
Ankur JAIN ; Parimal AGRAWAL ; Pankaj MALHOTRA ; Ritambhra NADA ; Subhash VARMA
Blood Research 2018;53(1):79-81
No abstract available.
Plummer-Vinson Syndrome*
2.A young man with acute respiratory distress syndrome: eosinophilia is not always “benign”.
Ankur JAIN ; Pankaj MALHOTRA ; Vikas SURI ; Ritesh AGARWAL ; Amanjit BAL ; Subhash VARMA
Blood Research 2017;52(4):329-332
No abstract available.
Eosinophilia*
;
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult*
3.A weeping ulcer that vanished with a ‘SMILE’.
Ankur JAIN ; Gaurav PRAKASH ; Amanjit BAL ; Pankaj MALHOTRA ; Subhash VARMA
Blood Research 2018;53(1):8-8
No abstract available.
Ulcer*
4.Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
Faisal QURESHI ; Shyam Charan MEENA ; Vishal KUMAR ; Kajal JAIN ; Rajeev CHAUHAN ; Ankur LUTHRA
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(3):324-332
This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III adult patients aged 18–65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.
6.Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study
Faisal QURESHI ; Shyam Charan MEENA ; Vishal KUMAR ; Kajal JAIN ; Rajeev CHAUHAN ; Ankur LUTHRA
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(3):324-332
This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III adult patients aged 18–65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5±68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5±48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6±83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6±53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2±0.7 in the RD group and 3.2±0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.
8.An illustrative case of B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
Ankur JAIN ; JM KHUNGER ; Pooja PRASAD ; Sumita CHAUDHRY ; Monica SHARMA ; Dipender Kumar GUPTA ; Sumita SALUJA
Blood Research 2020;55(3):181-184
10.Alcohol associated liver cirrhotics have higher mortality after index hospitalization: Long-term data of 5,138 patients
Priyanka JAIN ; Saggere Muralikrishna SHASTHRY ; Ashok Kumar CHOUDHURY ; Rakhi MAIWALL ; Guresh KUMAR ; Ankit BHARADWAJ ; Vinod ARORA ; Rajan VIJAYARAGHAVAN ; Ankur JINDAL ; Manoj Kumar SHARMA ; Vikram BHATIA ; Shiv Kumar SARIN
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(1):175-185
Background/Aims:
Liver cirrhosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Every episode of decompensation and hospitalization reduces survival. We studied the clinical profile and long-term outcomes comparing alcohol-related cirrhosis (ALC) and non-ALC.
Methods:
Cirrhosis patients at index hospitalisation (from January 2010 to June 2017), with ≥1 year follow-up were included.
Results:
Five thousand and one hundred thirty-eight cirrhosis patients (age, 49.8±14.6 years; male, 79.5%; alcohol, 39.5%; Child-A:B:C, 11.7%:41.6%:46.8%) from their index hospitalization were analysed. The median time from diagnosis of cirrhosis to index hospitalization was 2 years (0.2–10). One thousand and seven hundred seven patients (33.2%) died within a year; 1,248 (24.3%) during index hospitalization. 59.5% (2,316/3,890) of the survivors, required at least one readmission, with additional mortality of 19.8% (459/2,316). ALC compared to non-ALC were more often (P<0.001) male (97.7% vs. 67.7%), younger (40–50 group, 36.2% vs. 20.2%; P<0.001) with higher liver related complications at baseline, (P<0.001 for each), sepsis: 20.3% vs. 14.9%; ascites: 82.2% vs. 65.9%; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: 21.8% vs. 15.7%; hepatic encephalopathy: 41.0% vs. 25.0%; acute variceal bleeding: 32.0% vs. 23.7%; and acute kidney injury 30.5% vs. 19.6%. ALC patients had higher Child-Pugh (10.6±2.0 vs. 9.0±2.3), model for end-stage liver-disease scores (21.49±8.47 vs. 16.85±7.79), and higher mortality (42.3% vs. 27.3%, P<0.001) compared to non-ALC.
Conclusions
One-third of cirrhosis patients die in index hospitalization. 60% of the survivors require at least one rehospitalization within a year. ALC patients present with higher morbidity and mortality and at a younger age.
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail