Allopurinol ; adverse effects ; Drug Hypersensitivity ; etiology ; mortality ; Gout ; drug therapy ; Gout Suppressants ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; methods ; Nephrology ; methods ; Risk ; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTIONNeuropsychiatric manifestations can occur in up to two-thirds of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The presentations as well as the underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms can be heterogeneous and therefore have an enormous impact on therapeutic options.

CLINICAL PICTUREWe describe 2 patients who presented similarly with acute onset binocular reversible visual loss. The first patient had anti-phospholipid syndrome and optic neuritis, while the second patient suffered from posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome.

TREATMENTPatient one was treated with anti-coagulation and immunosuppression while the second patient required the withdrawal of immunosuppression and supportive therapy.

OUTCOMEBoth patients responded favourably and had complete visual recovery.

CONCLUSIONSDifferent management strategies have to be employed for similar presentations having different aetiologies, underscoring the need for constant clinical vigilance.

Adult ; Antiphospholipid Syndrome ; complications ; etiology ; Brain Diseases ; etiology ; immunology ; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic ; etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ; complications ; microbiology ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Lupus Vasculitis, Central Nervous System ; diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Optic Neuritis ; etiology ; Salmonella Infections ; complications ; Salmonella enteritidis ; Time Factors ; Vision Disorders ; etiology ; immunology

INTRODUCTIONWe report angioedema as a rare presentation leading to a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

CLINICAL PICTUREA diagnosis of angioedema was delayed in a patient presenting with limb and facial swelling until she developed acute upper airway compromise. After excluding allergic and hereditary angioedema, acquired angioedema (AAE) was suspected, possibly precipitated by respiratory tract infection. Associated clinical and laboratory features led to a diagnosis of SLE.

TREATMENTManagement proved challenging and included high dose steroids and immunosuppressants.

OUTCOMEThe patient responded to treatment and remains in remission without recurrence of the angioedema.

CONCLUSIONAAE occurs due to the acquired deficiency of inhibitor of C1 component of complement (C1 INH). Lymphoproliferative disorders and anti-C1 INH antibodies are well-described associations. However, one should also consider the possibility of SLE.

Angioedema ; blood ; etiology ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Antiphospholipid Syndrome ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Brain ; pathology ; Complement C1 Inactivator Proteins ; analysis ; deficiency ; Female ; Humans ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic ; complications ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Insufficiency ; etiology ; therapy

INTRODUCTIONThe objective of this study was to determine if patient information needs are being met and the level of patient satisfaction with rheumatology practitioners in participatory decision-making and thereby indirectly explore whether concordance was achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe design was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey of 420 patients attending outpatient clinics at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital who were taking disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or a biological treatment. The population served is ethnically homogeneous and predominantly Caucasian.

RESULTSThe response rate was 76%. Most respondents (79%) had inflammatory arthritis while 66% had rheumatoid arthritis. Seventy-seven per cent of patients reported that the rationale behind commencing treatment was explained and that they were given ample opportunities to ask questions. Eighty-two per cent said they were given an appropriate amount of information. Sixty-four per cent of patients were satisfied with their level of participation in the decision-making process, although a substantial number (25%) said that information from different sources was conflicting. There was no correlation between concern about side effects and patients' perceptions of the effectiveness of medication. Females were more concerned than males about possible side effects; P =0.009, using the Mann-Whitney U test. One third of the patients altered their medication in response to whether their arthritis felt better or worse.

CONCLUSIONThe majority of patients were satisfied that their information needs were met and with the care provided in the practitioner clinic. Participatory decision-making was sub-optimal despite patient satisfaction with the amount of time allocated to meeting their information needs. We found that patients exercise autonomy in managing their arthritis by regulating their medications through an active decision-making process, which is informed by their previous experience of medication, and how well controlled they felt their arthritis was. Research into this decision-making process may hold the key to achieving concordance.

Antirheumatic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Arthritis ; drug therapy ; psychology ; Decision Making ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Education as Topic ; standards ; Patient Participation ; Patient Satisfaction ; statistics & numerical data ; Rheumatology ; standards ; Singapore