BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). METHODS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m2 or more than 30 kg/m2, or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P < 0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P < 0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI < 18 kg/m2 and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m2.
Body Mass Index ; Carbon Dioxide* ; Carbon* ; Colonoscopy* ; Humans ; Insufflation* ; Intubation ; Water*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the various etiologies, yields, and effects of capsule endoscopy (CE) on management and complications, along with follow up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. METHODS: The study group of patients included those having obscure, overt, or occult GI bleeding. The findings were categorized as (A) obvious/definitive, (B) equivocal, or (C) negative. Any significant alteration in patient management post CE in the form of drug or surgical intervention was noted. RESULTS: Total patients included in the study were 68 (48 males and 20 females). The ratio of male:female was 2.4:1. The age ranged between 16 years to 77 years. Mean age for males was 62+/-14 years, for females 58+/-16 years. The total yield of CE with definitive lesions was in 44/68 (65.0%) of patients. In descending order (A) angiodysplasia 16/68 (23.53%), (B) Crohn's disease 10/68 (14.70%), (C) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy 8/68 (11.76%), (D) small bowel ulcers 4/68 (5.88%), (E) jejunal and ileal polyps 2/68 (2.94%), (F) intestinal lymphangiectasis 2/68 (2.94%), and (G) ileal hemangiomas 2/68 (2.94%) were followed. Equivocal findings 12/68 (17.65%) and negative study 12/68 (17.65%) was found. Complications in the form of capsule retention in the distal ileum were noted in 2/68 (2.94%) subjects. Statistically, there was a higher probability of finding the etiology if the CE was done during an episode of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: CE plays an important role in diagnosing etiologies of obscure GI bleeding. Its role in influencing the management outcome is vital.
Angiodysplasia ; Capsule Endoscopy* ; Crohn Disease ; Diagnosis* ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hemangioma ; Hemorrhage* ; Humans ; Ileum ; Lymphangiectasis, Intestinal ; Male ; Polyps ; Ulcer