STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. PURPOSE: The study aimed to develop a finite element (FE) model to determine the stress on the discs adjacent to the fused segment following different types of floating lumbar spinal fusions. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The quantification of the adjacent disc stress following different types of floating lumbar fusions has not been reported. The magnitude of the stress on the discs above and below the floating fusion remains unknown. METHODS: A computer-aided engineering-based approach using implicit FE analysis was employed to assess the stress on the lumbar discs above and below the floating fusion segment (L4–L5) following anterior and posterior lumbar spine fusions at one, two, and three levels (with and without instrumentation). RESULTS: Both discs suprajacent and infrajacent to the floating fusion experienced increased stress, but the suprajacent disc experienced relatively high stress level. Instrumentation increased the stress on the discs suprajacent and infrajacent to the floating fusion, but the magnitude of stress on the suprajacent disc remained relatively high. CONCLUSIONS: The FE model was employed under similar loading and boundary conditions to provide quantitative data, which will be useful for clinicians to understand the probable long-term effects of floating fusions.
Intervertebral Disc ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Spinal Fusion ; Spine*

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to develop a finite element (FE) model to study the long-term effects of various types of lumbar spinal interventions on the discs adjacent to the fused segment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Earlier FE studies have been limited to one particular type of fusion and comparative quantification of the adjacent disc stresses for different types of surgical interventions has not been reported. METHODS: A computer aided engineering (CAE) based approach using implicit FE analysis assessed the stresses in the lumbar discs adjacent to the fused segment following anterior and posterior lumbar spine fusions at one, two and three levels (with and without instrumentation). RESULTS: It was found that instrumentation and length of fusion were the most significant factors in increasing adjacent level stresses in the lumbar discs. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, a calibrated FE model that examined spinal interventions under similar loading and boundary conditions was used to provide quantitative data which would be useful for clinicians to understand the probable long-term effect of their choice of surgical intervention.
Intervertebral Disc ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Spinal Fusion* ; Spine

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to develop a finite element (FE) model to study the long-term effects of various types of lumbar spinal interventions on the discs adjacent to the fused segment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Earlier FE studies have been limited to one particular type of fusion and comparative quantification of the adjacent disc stresses for different types of surgical interventions has not been reported. METHODS: A computer aided engineering (CAE) based approach using implicit FE analysis assessed the stresses in the lumbar discs adjacent to the fused segment following anterior and posterior lumbar spine fusions at one, two and three levels (with and without instrumentation). RESULTS: It was found that instrumentation and length of fusion were the most significant factors in increasing adjacent level stresses in the lumbar discs. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, a calibrated FE model that examined spinal interventions under similar loading and boundary conditions was used to provide quantitative data which would be useful for clinicians to understand the probable long-term effect of their choice of surgical intervention.
Intervertebral Disc ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Spinal Fusion* ; Spine