Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects* ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/etiology* ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/physiology* ; Pneumonia, Viral/etiology* ; SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUNDThere have been no mortality/morbidity endpoint studies with losartan in Chinese heart failure patients. The objective was to evaluate the effects of high-dose vs. low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in Chinese subjects with heart failure.

METHODSThis study was a post hoc analysis of the Heart failure Endpoint evaluation of Angiotensin II Antagonist losartan (HEAAL) trial (n = 545). Chinese adults with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV) intolerant of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were randomized to losartan 150 mg or 50 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the composite event rate of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Safety and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTSMedian follow-up was 4.8 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar to the overall HEAAL cohort. Overall, 120 (44.1%) subjects in the losartan 150 mg group and 137 (50.2%) subjects in the losartan 50 mg group died (any cause) or were hospitalized for heart failure (hazard ratio (OR) 0.807, 95%CI 0.631 - 1.031). There were no notable differences between treatment groups in the proportion of subjects with adverse experiences.

CONCLUSIONThe results of this post hoc analysis in Chinese subjects, although not powered to show significance, were generally consistent with the main study results, which demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure with daily losartan 150 mg vs. losartan 50 mg in subjects with symptomatic heart failure and intolerance to ACE inhibitors, supporting the use of the higher dose for optimum clinical benefit.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Heart Failure ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Losartan ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged

BACKGROUNDThe non-hemodynamic effects of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in the delay of progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the influence of irbesartan on the urinary excretion of cytokines in patients with CKD.

METHODSIn this randomized perspective clinical trial, different doses of irbesartan (150 mg/d and 300 mg/d) were given to two groups of patients in a cross-over design. Blood pressure (BP), creatinine clearance (Ccr) and 24-hour proteinuria were examined. Urinary excretion of cytokines was determined by human inflammatory cytokine antibody array. A two-fold change in spot intensity was considered significant.

RESULTSUrinary excretion of cytokines (granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), interferon γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 1β (IL-1b), IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-11, IL-15 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1d (MIP-1d)) in group B (irbesartan 300 mg/d) was significantly decreased in comparison to group A (irbesartan 150 mg/d) after 8-week treatment. In group A, 8 weeks of treatment induced a two- to nine-fold reduction in urinary cytokine levels (GCSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1a, IL-11, IL-12p40, MCP-2, MIP-1a), while increasing the dosage to 300 mg/d further decreased the excretion of GCSF, GM-CSF, IL-12p40, MCP-2 and MIP-1a by week 18. There was no significant difference in BP or Ccr between the two groups. However, 24-hour proteinuria was significantly reduced in both groups, and in group A the reduction was dose dependent.

CONCLUSIONIrbesartan offers additional renoprotection in a dose-dependent manner by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines excretion in the urine of CKD patients.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Biphenyl Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Chronic Disease ; Creatinine ; metabolism ; Cross-Over Studies ; Cytokines ; urine ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases ; drug therapy ; immunology ; Prospective Studies ; Tetrazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

To test the hypothesis that exogenous purified angiotensin II (ANG) might cause apoptosis of alveolar epithelial cells (AECs) and acute lung injury, male Wistar rats were intratracheally instilled with purified ANG (10 mumol/L), ANG plus the caspase inhibitor ZVAD-fmk (60 mumol/L), ANG plus the ANG receptor AT1 antagonist losartan (LOS, 100 mumol/L) or sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) vehicle alone. Six or 20 h later, the lungs were lavaged in situ for determination of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid content of hemoglobin (Hb) and fluorescent (BODIPY)-albumin, a bolus of which was injected intravenously 15 min prior to BAL. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL) revealed that instillation of ANG, but not PBS alone, increased labeling of fragmented DNA in bronchiolar epithelial cells and in AECs (P<0.05) at 6 h post-ANG. Increased TUNEL was abrogated by concurrent instillation of ZVAD-fmk or LOS. Significant increased numbers of caspase-positive cells were observed by anti-caspase 3 immunolabeling after instillation of ANG (P<0.01); the same doses of LOS or ZVAD-fmk that blocked TUNEL also blocked the activation of caspase 3 (P<0.01). Intratracheal instillation of ANG also remarkably increased BAL BODIPY-albumin (P< 0.01) and Hb (P<0.05), both of which were eliminated by ZVAD-fmk or LOS. These data indicate that exposure of AECs to ANG in vivo is sufficient to induce apoptosis and alveolar epithelial barrier injury mediated by ANG receptor AT1.
Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones ; pharmacology ; Angiotensin II ; adverse effects ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Apoptosis ; Caspase 3 ; metabolism ; Caspase Inhibitors ; pharmacology ; Epithelial Cells ; pathology ; Losartan ; pharmacology ; Lung Injury ; chemically induced ; pathology ; Male ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1 ; metabolism

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cardiotrophin-1(CT-1) expression in the ventricle and the effects of angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist (AT(1)RA) irbesartan on the ventricular remodeling in adriamycin myocardiopathy. METHODS: Thirty male SD rats were randomized into 2 groups: a control group (n=10) and a model group (n=20). The model group was administered adriamycin and 18 rats survived. And theses rats were randomized again into 2 groups. One was treated with irbesartan [50 mg/(kg x d), with stomach-tube], and the other received equal saline, so did the control group. After 12 weeks, the protein level of CT-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Ventricular CT-1 in the model control group and the treatment group was higher than that in the control group and the correlation analysis showed that ventricular CT-1 of the model control group was positively correlated with the left ventricular weight index, and CT-1 of the treatment group was lower than that of the model control group. CONCLUSION CT-1 was assumed to take part in the ventricular remodeling. The mechanism of irbesartan on the ventricular remodeling may be related to the downregulation of CT-1 expression.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Biphenyl Compounds ; pharmacology ; Cardiomyopathies ; chemically induced ; metabolism ; Cytokines ; metabolism ; Doxorubicin ; adverse effects ; Irbesartan ; Male ; Myocytes, Cardiac ; metabolism ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Tetrazoles ; pharmacology ; Ventricular Remodeling ; drug effects

BACKGROUNDCentral blood pressure (BP) is pathophysiologically more important than peripheral BP for the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Arterial stiffness is also a good predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The effects of benidipine, a unique dual L-/T-type calcium channel blocker, on central BP have not been reported. This study aimed to compare the effect of benidipine and losartan on the central BP and arterial stiffness in mild to moderate essential hypertensives.

METHODSThis 24 weeks, multi-center, open label, randomized, active drug comparative, parallel group study was designed as a non-inferiority study. The eligible patients (n = 200) were randomly assigned to receive benidipine (n = 101) or losartan (n = 99). Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to measure the central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx). We also measured the metabolic and inflammatory markers.

RESULTSAfter 24 weeks, the central BP decreased significantly from baseline by (16.8 ± 14.0/10.5 ± 9.2) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) (systolic/diastolic BP; P < 0.001) in benidipine group and (18.9 ± 14.7/12.1 ± 10.2) mmHg (P < 0.001) in losartan group respectively. Both benidipine and losartan groups significantly lowered peripheral BP (P < 0.001) and AIx (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups. The mean aortic, brachial and femoral PWV did not change in both groups after 24-week treatment. There were no significant changes of the blood metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers in each group.

CONCLUSIONBenidipine is as effective as losartan in lowering the central and peripheral BP, and improving arterial stiffness.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Calcium Channel Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Dihydropyridines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Essential Hypertension ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Losartan ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Vascular Stiffness ; drug effects

BACKGROUNDThe results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in high-risk patients, and telmisartan was associated with slightly superior tolerability. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. This study aimed to analyze the data from ONTARGET obtained from a subgroup of patients enrolled in China and to evaluate the demographic and baseline characteristics, the compliance, efficacy, and safety of the different treatment strategies in randomized patients in China.

METHODSA total of 1159 high-risk patients were randomized into three treatment groups: with 390 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan, 385 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril and 384 assigned to receive both study medications. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years.

RESULTSThe mean age of Chinese patients was 65.6 years, 73.6% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with stroke/transient ischemic attacks at baseline in China was two times more than the entire study population (47.7% vs. 20.9%). In Chinese patients the proportion of permanent discontinuation of study medication due to cough was 0.5% in the telmisartan group, which was much less than that in the combination or the ramipril group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of primary outcome among three treatment groups of Chinese patients. More strokes occurred in Chinese patients than in the entire study population (8.5% vs. 4.5%). Greater systolic blood pressure reduction (-9.8 mmHg), and more renal function failure were noted in the combination treatment group than in the ramipril or telmisartan group (2.6% vs. 1.6% and 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONSThere was no evidence that the results of ONTARGET differed between Chinese patients and the entire study population with respect to the incidence of primary outcome, particularly safety. Compliance with study medications was good. The evidence from ONTARGET indicated that the treatment strategies in ONTARGET were applicable to patients in China.

Aged ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Benzoates ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; China ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Heart Failure ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ramipril ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With the increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease, angiocardiography using contrast-enhancing media has become an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool, despite the risk of contrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). CIAKI may be exacerbated by renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers, which are also used in a variety of cardiovascular disorders. This study evaluated the effects of RAS blockade on CIAKI after coronary angiography. METHODS: Patients who underwent coronary angiography in our hospital between May 2009 and July 2011 were reviewed. Serum creatinine levels before and after coronary angiography were recorded. CIAKI was diagnosed according to an increase in serum creatinine > 0.5 mg/dL or 25% above baseline. RESULTS: A total of 1,472 subjects were included in this study. Patients taking RAS blockers were older, had a higher baseline creatinine level, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and had received a greater volume of contrast medium. After propensity score matching, no difference was observed between the RAS (+) and RAS (.) groups. Multiple logistic regression identified RAS blockade, age, severe heart failure, contrast volume used, hemoglobin level, and eGFR as predictors of CIAKI. Multiple logistic regression after propensity matching showed that RAS blockade was associated with CIAKI (odds ratio, 1.552; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the incidence of CIAKI was increased in patients treated with RAS blockers.
Acute Kidney Injury/*chemically induced/diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology ; Aged ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/*adverse effects ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/*adverse effects ; Biological Markers/blood ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Contrast Media/*adverse effects/diagnostic use ; Coronary Angiography/*adverse effects ; Creatinine/blood ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney/*drug effects/physiopathology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Propensity Score ; Renin-Angiotensin System/*drug effects ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed dose combination of telmisartan 80 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg (TH) to telmisartan 80 mg (T) in Chinese patients who failed to respond adequately to treatment with T.

METHODThis is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical study. A total of 699 eligible hypertensive patients entered a one-week screening phase prior to the eight-week open-label T period. At the end of eight weeks, 345 patients who failed to respond to T (DBP > or = 90 mm Hg, 1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) were randomized to receive either TH (175 patients) or T (170 patients) for another eight weeks. Sitting and standing BP were taken 24 hours post-dose and adverse events were documented at visit with 4 weeks interval. Laboratory, ECG and physical examination were performed at screening, at baseline and at the final visit.

RESULTSAfter 8 weeks treatment, (1) The mean trough reduction in sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) from baseline in TH group was greater than that in T group (10.1 mm Hg vs 7.7 mm Hg, P = 0.0017). The mean trough reduction in sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) from baseline was 14.2 mm Hg in TH group and 7.4 mm Hg in T group (P < 0.0001). (2) The mean trough reduction in standing DBP and standing SBP from baseline were significantly greater in TH group (8.7 mm Hg and 12.9 mm Hg) compared those in T group (7.3 mm Hg and 7.0 mmHg, P = 0.0350, P < 0.0001). (3) The number and percentage of responders in TH group (129, 74.6%) were significantly higher than in T group (100, 59.2%, P = 0.0016). (4) The incidence of the study drug-related adverse events was similar between TH and T group (3.5% vs. 3.6%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONTH was more effective than T in patients not responded adequately to T in Chinese hypertensive patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Benzoates ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome

The study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of valsartan hydrochlorothiazide tablets, and to investigate the potential cause of bioinequivalence. This was a single-center study with an open, randomized double-way crossover design. Test and reference preparations containing 160 mg of valsartan and 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide were given to 36 healthy male volunteers. Plasma concentrations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide were determined simultaneously by LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated, while the bioequivalence between test and reference preparations were evaluated. The dissolution profiles of test and reference preparations in four different mediums were determined via dissolution test and HPLC. The similarity was investigated according to the similarity factors (f2). The F(o-t) and F(0-infinity) were (139.4 +/- 65.2)% and (137.5 +/- 61.2)% for valsartan of test preparations. It led to get the conclusion that test and reference preparations were not bioequivalent for valsartan. A significant difference was observed between test and reference tablets in the valsartan dissolution test of pH 1.2 hydrochloric acid solution. The key factor of the bioinequivalence might be that dissolution of valsartan in acid medium has marked difference between two preparations.
Administration, Oral ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Area Under Curve ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Cross-Over Studies ; Drug Liberation ; Humans ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Male ; Tablets ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Therapeutic Equivalency ; Valsartan ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Young Adult