The possibility to predict in vivo the histology of colorectal polyps by advanced endoscopic imaging has resulted in the implementation of a more conservative management for diminutive lesions detected at colonoscopy. In detail, a predict-and-do-not-resect strategy has been proposed for diminutive lesions located in the rectosigmoid tract, whilst a predict-resect-and-discard policy has been advocated for nonrectosigmoid diminutive polyps. Recently, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy set required thresholds to be met, before allowing the adoption of these policies in the clinical field. The ability of current endoscopic imaging in reaching these thresholds would depend on a complex interaction among the accuracy of advanced endoscopic imaging in differentiating between adenomatous and hyperplastic lesions, the prevalence of (advanced) neoplasia within diminutive lesions, and the type of surveillance intervals recommended. Aim of this review is to summarize the data supporting the application of both a predict-and-do-not-resect and a predict-resect-and-discard policies, also addressing the potential pitfalls associated with these strategies.
Adoption ; Colonoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Narrow Band Imaging ; Polyps ; Prevalence

Since the earliest reports, advanced clipping systems have been developed, and it is possible to choose among many models with different structural and technical features. The main drawback of through-the-scope clips is their small size, which allows the compression of limited amounts of tissue needed for large-size vessel treatment. Therefore, the over-the-scope clip system was realized, allowing a larger and stronger mechanical compression of large tissue areas, with excellent results in achieving a definitive hemostasis in difficult cases. Many studies have analyzed the indications and efficacy of two-pronged endoclips and have shown good results for initial and permanent hemostasis. The aim of this review was to provide updated information on indications, positioning techniques, and results of clip application for endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding lesions.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol. Results: After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment. Conclusions Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol. Results: After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment. Conclusions Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of three different treatment options (vaginal estriol, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and ospemifene) for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer and gynecologic cancer survivors. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed among 185 cancer survivors (including breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer) affected by GSM. Women were divided into three groups according to the prescribed therapy (vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene). Safety and efficacy of therapies were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Improvement in symptoms was compared using the following questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, Female Sexual Distress Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-dyspareunia, VAS-vulvar pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey, and Patients’ Impression of Global Improvement. Cancer recurrence was evaluated according to oncological protocol. Results: After the 6-month follow-up, no significant endometrial thickening or cancer recurrence was observed in any group. The rate of sexually active women significantly increased in all groups, as well as the frequency of sexual intercourse. Scores on questionnaires assessing women’s sexual function significantly improved in all patients. Women also complained of less vulvar pain and dyspareunia.Safety and efficacy of treatment were comparable between the three groups for all items except for dyspareunia. Patients taking ospemifene complained of less dyspareunia than those receiving local hormone treatment. Conclusions Vaginal estriol, vaginal DHEA, and ospemifene were effective in improving symptoms of GSM in cancer survivors and were not associated with cancer recurrence over the 6-month follow-up. Ospemifene was more effective than local hormones in treating dyspareunia.

Background/Aims: Patients with diverticular disease (DD) frequently have abnormal bowel movements. However, it is unknown whether the entity of these alterations is associated with the severity of DD. We aimed to assess bowel habits and their relationship with the severity of DD according to Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) classification, Combined Overview on Diverticular Assessment (CODA) score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Methods: An international, multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 43 centers. A 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of constipation and diarrhea. The association of constipation and diarrhea with DICA classification, CODA score, and basal FC was tested using non-parametric tests. Survival methods for censored observations were applied to test the association of constipation and diarrhea with the incidence of acute diverticulitis over a 3-year follow-up. Results: Of 871 patients with DD were included in the study. Of these, 208 (23.9%) and 199 (22.9%) reported a VAS score for constipation and diarrhea at least 3 at baseline, respectively. Higher constipation and diarrhea scores were associated with increasing DICA classification, CODA score and basal FC (P< 0.001). Constipation and diarrhea scores were independently associated with an increased hazard of developing acute diverticulitis (hazard ratio [HR]constipation = 1.15 per 1-VAS point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.27; P=0.004; and HRdiarrhea =1.14; 95% CI, 1.03–1.26; P=0.014, respectively). Conclusions In newly diagnosed patients with DD, higher endoscopic and combined scores of DD severity were associated with higher scores of constipation and diarrhea at baseline. Both constipation and diarrhea were independent prognostic factors of acute diverticulitis.

Background/Aims: Patients with diverticular disease (DD) frequently have abnormal bowel movements. However, it is unknown whether the entity of these alterations is associated with the severity of DD. We aimed to assess bowel habits and their relationship with the severity of DD according to Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) classification, Combined Overview on Diverticular Assessment (CODA) score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Methods: An international, multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 43 centers. A 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of constipation and diarrhea. The association of constipation and diarrhea with DICA classification, CODA score, and basal FC was tested using non-parametric tests. Survival methods for censored observations were applied to test the association of constipation and diarrhea with the incidence of acute diverticulitis over a 3-year follow-up. Results: Of 871 patients with DD were included in the study. Of these, 208 (23.9%) and 199 (22.9%) reported a VAS score for constipation and diarrhea at least 3 at baseline, respectively. Higher constipation and diarrhea scores were associated with increasing DICA classification, CODA score and basal FC (P< 0.001). Constipation and diarrhea scores were independently associated with an increased hazard of developing acute diverticulitis (hazard ratio [HR]constipation = 1.15 per 1-VAS point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.27; P=0.004; and HRdiarrhea =1.14; 95% CI, 1.03–1.26; P=0.014, respectively). Conclusions In newly diagnosed patients with DD, higher endoscopic and combined scores of DD severity were associated with higher scores of constipation and diarrhea at baseline. Both constipation and diarrhea were independent prognostic factors of acute diverticulitis.

Background/Aims: Patients with diverticular disease (DD) frequently have abnormal bowel movements. However, it is unknown whether the entity of these alterations is associated with the severity of DD. We aimed to assess bowel habits and their relationship with the severity of DD according to Diverticular Inflammation and Complication Assessment (DICA) classification, Combined Overview on Diverticular Assessment (CODA) score, and fecal calprotectin (FC). Methods: An international, multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 43 centers. A 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of constipation and diarrhea. The association of constipation and diarrhea with DICA classification, CODA score, and basal FC was tested using non-parametric tests. Survival methods for censored observations were applied to test the association of constipation and diarrhea with the incidence of acute diverticulitis over a 3-year follow-up. Results: Of 871 patients with DD were included in the study. Of these, 208 (23.9%) and 199 (22.9%) reported a VAS score for constipation and diarrhea at least 3 at baseline, respectively. Higher constipation and diarrhea scores were associated with increasing DICA classification, CODA score and basal FC (P< 0.001). Constipation and diarrhea scores were independently associated with an increased hazard of developing acute diverticulitis (hazard ratio [HR]constipation = 1.15 per 1-VAS point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.27; P=0.004; and HRdiarrhea =1.14; 95% CI, 1.03–1.26; P=0.014, respectively). Conclusions In newly diagnosed patients with DD, higher endoscopic and combined scores of DD severity were associated with higher scores of constipation and diarrhea at baseline. Both constipation and diarrhea were independent prognostic factors of acute diverticulitis.