1.The intravenously administered palonosetron does not affect the spinal anesthesia.
Myoung Hun KIM ; Seunghee KI ; Kwangrae CHO ; Wonjin LEE ; Sang Min SIN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S51-S52
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
2.Paroxysmal pain during spinal anesthesia.
Cheon Hee PARK ; Hong Chan PARK ; Yong Seok LIM ; Dae Il PARK ; Hyung Jin KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2014;67(Suppl):S56-S57
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
3.Paroxysmal pain during spinal anesthesia.
Cheon Hee PARK ; Hong Chan PARK ; Yong Seok LIM ; Dae Il PARK ; Hyung Jin KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2014;67(Suppl):S56-S57
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
4.Predictive factors for a difficult spinal anesthesia: a prospective study
Ronquillo Maria Paz ; Lim Lucille
Philippine Journal of Anesthesiology 2008;20(2):39-45
To determine whether there is any combination of patient characteristics that would be useful in predicting a difficult neuraxial block.
Human
;
ANESTHESIA, SPINAL
;
SPINAL PUNCTURE
;
ANESTHESIA
5.The Infiniti Plus ultrasound needle guidance system improves needle visualization during the placement of spinal anesthesia.
Hesham ELSHARKAWY ; Rovnat BABAZADE ; Sree KOLLI ; Hari KALAGARA ; Mounir L SOLIMAN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2016;69(4):417-419
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Needles*
;
Ultrasonography*
6.Comparing the percentage of headache following spinal anesthesia with Whitacre needle and Quincke needle
Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Information 2005;0(12):22-25
A prospective study was conducted on 380 patients at age of 16 to 65 who were operated at The Anaesthetic and Recuperative Department of Vietnam-Sec Hospital from Jun 2003 to April 2005. The patients were divided randomly into two groups: Group I using the needle anesthesia Whitacre 25G and Group II using the needle anesthesia Quincke 25G. Results: the pulses of both groups before and after anesthesia were different (p>0.05), the arterial pressure 30 minutes after anesthesia of both groups reduced (p>0.05) the rate of respiratory before and after anesthesia of both groups were different, no case with side effect on respiratory which needed intervention. Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric Marcain 0.5% (dose 0.2mg/kg) at L3-L4 interspaces causes completely anesthesia for lower extremities operations, side effects were negligible
Anesthesia, Spinal Headache
7.A cardiovascular collapse following vigorous cough during spinal anesthesia.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S49-S50
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Cough*
8.Propriospinal Myoclonus following Spinal Anesthesia: Two Cases.
Byoung Soo SHIN ; Man Wook SEO ; Young Hyun KIM
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2002;20(2):208-210
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Myoclonus*
9.Effect of Loss of Epidural Negative Pressure on Spinal Sensory Blokade Level of Spinal Anesthesia.
Bong Il KIM ; Woon Seok RHO ; Kun Hee LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1997;33(5):908-911
BACKGROUND: We postulated that loss of epidural negative pressure might affect on the sensory blockade level of spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty nine patients were involved in our study; group 1, spinal anesthsia with 23G spinal needle (n=20): group 2, spinal anesthesia with 27G spinal needle through the 18G Weiss epidural needle (n=19). Sensory blockade level was checked by pinprick test at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 60 and 90 minutes after spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no difference of sensory blockade level between group 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: From above result, there was no evidence of loss of epidural negative pressure affecting on the spinal sensory blockade level.
Anesthesia, Spinal*
;
Humans
;
Needles
10.A Case of Intrinsic Spinal Cord Lesions Complicating Epidural Anesthesia.
Joon Sung AHN ; Sang Jin KIM ; Eung Gyu KIM
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2006;24(2):181-183
No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Epidural*
;
Spinal Cord*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail