2.First-time anterior shoulder dislocations: should they be arthroscopically stabilised?
Sedeek Mohamed SEDEEK ; Gerard W W EE ; Andrew H C TAN
Singapore medical journal 2014;55(10):511-quiz 516
The glenohumeral joint is inherently unstable because the large humeral head articulates with the small shadow glenoid fossa. Traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder is a relatively common athletic injury, and the high frequency of recurrent instability in young athletes after shoulder dislocation is discouraging to both the patient and the treating physician. Management of primary traumatic shoulder dislocation remains controversial. Traditionally, treatment involves initial immobilisation for 4-6 weeks, followed by functional rehabilitation. However, in view of the high recurrence rates associated with this traditional approach, there has been an escalating interest in determining whether immediate surgical intervention can lower the rate of recurrent shoulder dislocation, improving the patient's quality of life. This review article aims to provide an overview of the nature and pathogenesis of first-time primary anterior shoulder dislocations, the widely accepted management modalities, and the efficacy of primary surgical intervention in first-time primary anterior shoulder dislocations.
Arthroscopy
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Shoulder Dislocation
;
etiology
;
surgery
;
Shoulder Joint
;
pathology
;
surgery
3.Genetic polymorphisms in NAT1, NAT2, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to colorectal cancer among Filipinos
Eva Maria C. Cutiongco-de la Paz ; Corazon A. Ngelangel ; Virgilio P. Bañ ; ez ; Francisco T. Roxas ; Catherine Lynn T. Silao ; Jose B. Nevado Jr. ; Alberto B. Roxas ; Oliver G. , Florendo ; Ma. Cecilia M. Sison ; Orlino Bisquera, Jr ; Luminardo M. Ramos ; Elizabeth A. Nuqui ; Arnold Joseph M. Fernandez ; Maria Constancia O. Carrillo ; Beatriz J. Tiangco ; Aileen D. Wang ; Rosalyn H. Sebastian ; Richmond B. Ceniza ; Leander Linus Philip P. Simpao ; Lakan U. Beratio ; Eleanor A. Dominguez ; Albert B. Albay Jr. ; Alfredo Y. Pontejos Jr. ; Nathaniel W. Yang ; Arsenio A. Cabungcal ; Rey A. Desales ; Nelia S. Tan-Liu ; Sullian S. Naval ; Roberto M. Montevirge ; Catalina de Siena E. Gonda-Dimayacyac ; Pedrito Y. Tagayuna ; John A. Coloma ; Gil M. Vicente ; Higinio T. Mappala ; Alex C. Tapia ; Emmanuel F. Montana Jr. ; Jonathan M. Asprer ; Reynaldo O. Joson ; Sergio P. Paguio ; Tristan T. Chipongian ; Joselito F. David ; Florentino C. Doble ; Maria Noemi G. Pato ; Benito B. Bionat Jr ; Hans Francis D. Ferraris ; Adonis A. Guancia ; Eriberto R. Layda ; Andrew D. Dimacali ; Conrado C. Cajucom ; Richard C. Tia ; Mark U. Javelosa ; Regie Lyn P. Santos-Cortez ; Frances Maureen C. Rocamora ; Roemel Jeusep Bueno ; Carmencita D. Padilla
Acta Medica Philippina 2017;51(3):216-222
Objectives. Polymorphisms in metabolic genes which alter rates of bioactivation and detoxification have been shown to modulate susceptibility to colorectal cancer. This study sought to evaluate the colorectal cancer risk from environmental factors and to do polymorphism studies on genes that code for Phase I and II xenobiotic metabolic enzymes among Filipino colorectal cancer patients and matched controls. Methods. A total of 224 colorectal cancer cases and 276 controls from the Filipino population were genotyped for selected polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, NAT1 and NAT2. Medical and diet histories, occupational exposure and demographic data were also collected for all subject participants.Results. Univariate logistic regression of non-genetic factors identified exposure to UV (sunlight) (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.16-3.39) and wood dust (OR 2.66, 95% CI: 1.21-5.83) and moldy food exposure (OR 1.61, 95% CI:1.11-2.35) as risk factors; while the NAT2*6B allele (recessive model OR 1.51, 95% CI :1.06-2.16; dominant model OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.05-3.33) and homozygous genotype (OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.19-4.03) were found to be significant among the genetic factors. After multivariate logistic regression of both environmental and genetic factors, only UV radiation exposure (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.21-3.58) and wood dust exposure (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 0.95-5.30) remained to be significantly associated with increasing colorectal cancer risk in the study population.Conclusion. This study demonstrated that UV sunlight and wood dust exposure play a greater role in influencing colorectal cancer susceptibility than genotype status from genetic polymorphisms of the GST and the NAT` genes.
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Polymorphism, Genetic