OBJECTIVETo assess the effect of preoperative long course radiotherapy (RT) on anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection(LAR) for rectal cancer.

METHODSMedline, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure,the Cochrane Library databases and other databases were searched for relevant studies. Correlation between preoperative long course RT and AL after LAR for rectal cancer was examined. Review Manager 5.2 software was used to pool raw data and test the heterogeneity of existing studies and to calculate the incorporated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Finally, forest plots and funnel plots were created to allow for visual comparison of the results or the effect of publication bias.

RESULTSA total of 881 studies were identified and 10 studies (n=7829) were eligible for the meta-analysis, including 2581 cases of preoperative RT, and 5248 cases of surgery alone without RT. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage rate between the two groups (OR:1.17, 95%CI:0.98-1.39, P=0.09).

CONCLUSIONSPreoperative long course RT did not increase the risk of postoperative AL after LAR in patients with rectal cancer.

Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Preoperative Care ; Radiography ; Rectal Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery

In order to prevent and reduce the severity of anastomotic leakage after low rectal cancer surgery, prophylactic ileostomy is often performed by the clinician simultaneously. There are many controversies about prophylactic ileostomy in medicine, such as ileostomy indications, ileostomy complications, ileostomy reversal time, ileostomy reversal method and technique. Based on relevant literature and our own experience, we discussed the timing, method and complications of ileostomy reversal in this article to improve the diagnosis and treatment of ileostomy reversal as well as the life quality of the patients after ileostomy reversal.
Humans ; Ileostomy/methods* ; Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Rectum/surgery*

OBJECTIVETo study the efficacy, safety and reliability of colonic sac duct for first-stage repair of colorectal anastomotic leakage.

METHODSAn animal model of colon anastomotic leakage was established in 30 Tibet miniature pigs, which were randomly divided into treatment group and control group (n=15). Colon anastomotic leakage in the treatment group was repaired using the colonic sac duct, while the control group received conventional surgical repair. At 7, 14, and 21 days after the surgery, the healing of the anastomotic leakage was evaluated by examining the bursting pressure, tissue microvessel density and hydroxyproline content at the anastomosis.

RESULTSUsing the colonic sac duct, the anastomotic leakage was successfully repaired without death of the pigs or the occurrence of intestinal stenosis or necrosis. At 7 and 14 days after the surgery, the bursting pressure, hydroxyproline contents, and microvessel density in the treatment groups were higher than those in the control group, but such difference was not found at 21 days.

CONCLUSIONColonic sac duct allows effective repair of colon anastomotic leakage, and is especially useful for leakage lasting for 48-72 h complicated by severe abdominal infection.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; surgery ; Animals ; Colon ; surgery ; Female ; Male ; Rectum ; surgery ; Swine ; Swine, Miniature

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the necessity of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer below peritoneal reflection.

METHODSThe databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang and CNKI were searched. The eligible studies were identified for pooled analyses.

RESULTSSix randomized controlled trials with 648 cases(332 patients with defunctioning stoma and 316 without stoma) and 25 retrospective controlled trials with 10,722 cases(4,470 patients with defunctioning stoma and 6,252 without stoma) were included. Combined analyses showed that defunctioning stoma was effective for decreasing risk of postoperative anastomotic leakage (RR=0.33 and 95% CI:0.21-0.53 for RCTs, OR=0.60 and 95% CI:0.42-0.85 for retrospective studies), reoperation (RR=0.30, 95% CI:0.16-0.53 for RCTs, OR=0.26 and 95% CI:0.21-0.32 for retrospective studies) and mortality(OR=0.41, 95% CI:0.27-0.62 for retrospective studies).

CONCLUSIONDefunctioning stoma should be routinely performed in low anterior resection for high-risk patients.

Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Enterostomy ; methods ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo explore the association between the score of preoperative Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) and anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for the rectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 641 patients with rectal cancer undergoing anterior resection in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University between January 2003 and July 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using NRS 2002. Association of clinicopathologic characteristics with postoperative anastomotic leakage was examined using univariate χ(2) and Logistic regression model.

RESULTSAmong the 641 patients, postoperative anastomotic leakage occurred in 26 (4.1%) cases. The proportion of anastomotic leakage in patients with the NRS 2002 score ≥3 was significantly higher than that in patients with the score <3 (6.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.002). After the adjustment of factors as age, distance of anastomosis above the anal margin, and pathological staging, NRS 2002 score ≥3 was identified as an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer (OR=3.198, 95%CI:1.324-7.722, P=0.010).

CONCLUSIONThe use of the NRS 2002 for preoperative evaluation on patient's nutritional status may help to predict the occurrence of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer, which may be involved in the indication of protecting ileostomy in clinical practice.

Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nutritional Status ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

The rate of sphincter-preserving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer is increasing, but anastomotic leakage remains to be one of the common serious complications after operation. How to reduce the morbility and mortality of anastomotic leakage is always a hot and difficult point in colorectal surgery. Protective ostomy is a common method to deal with the above problems in clinical practice. However, some problems such as inappropriate stoma and stoma-related complications etc. become the current clinical challenges. The purpose of this consensus focusing on indication of ostomy, clinical value, ostomy skills, prevention of stoma complications, reversion of stoma and stoma nursing aims to provide guidance for the clinical practice of protective ostomy in the operation of mid-low rectal cancer in China.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Consensus ; Humans ; Ostomy/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Surgical Stomas

Defunctioning stoma is an effective method to reduce symptomatic anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. It is of concern that about 1 in 5 defunctioning stomas will not be restored, that is, becoming permanent. And that is usually beyond expectation by physicians and patients, which deserves enough attention. The causes are complex, including anastomotic complications, tumor progression, perioperative death, poor anal function and patient willingness. Possible risk factors include symptomatic anastomotic leakage, age, tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, anal function, TNM stage, ASA score, hospital factors, etc. Those factors may occur in various stages of patient referral such as before neoadjuvant therapy, prior to surgery, intra or post-operative period, and follow-up. Adequate physician-patient communication and shared decision-making, comprehensive tumor and patient function assessment, rational treatment strategy, careful manipulation during operation and good quality control, and meticulous perioperative management are important steps to reduce the permanent stoma. When shared decision-making, patients' needs should be fully considered while unnecessary expectations of anal preservation should be avoided. The risk of perpetuation of defunctioning stoma should be fully informed. Safe operation, especially anastomosis, is the key to avoid permanent stoma. And attention should be paid to the early detection and intervention of postoperative anastomotic stenosis.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*

Anastomotic leakage (AL) has always been a persistent issue for colorectal surgeons. It is still difficult to reduce the incidence of AL despite the advances in technology and equipment. With the development of evidence-based medicine, increasing high-risk factors for AL have been identified. How to efficiently and systematically combine and quantify these isolated risk factors to provide a scientific early warning of AL in clinical practices and help surgeons in choosing the optimal prophylactic strategies, is of great significance for reducing the incidence of AL. There are generally two types of AL prediction models in colorectal surgery, including prognostic models (for preoperative and intraoperative AL prediction) and diagnostic models (for early warning and improving the early diagnosis rate of AL). Prophylactic strategies for AL include stabilizing the underlying diseases, improving anemia and hypoalbuminemia, choosing an appropriate operative time window, and emphasizing and improving anastomotic techniques (including choosing an appropriate size of stapler). However, a prophylactic ostomy is still the most common method for surgeons. However, how to reduce the morbidity of complications following prophylactic ostomy and how to avoid the conversion of the prophylactic stoma to permanent stoma need further study.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects* ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods* ; Risk Factors

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) surgery increases the rate of anal sphincter preservation in patients with ultra-low rectal cancers. However, the anastomotic site of ISR surgery is at risk for structural healing complications such as anastomotic leakage, anastomotic dehiscence, secondary anastomotic stenosis, chronic presacral sinus, rectovaginal fistula, and rectourethral fistula, which can lead to a persistent defunctioning ostomy or a secondary permanent colostomy. This article systematically describes the preoperative high-risk factors and characteristics of anastomotic site structural healing complications after ISR surgery, as well as the management of the anastomotic site during various stages including hospitalization, from discharge to one month after surgery, from one month after surgery to before stoma reversal, and after stoma reversal. This is to provide a clearer understanding of the risks associated with the anastomotic site at different stages of the healing process and to timely detect and actively manage related complications, thereby reducing the rate of permanent colostomy and truly achieving the dual goals of "survival benefit" and "quality of life improvement" in ISR surgery.
Female ; Humans ; Anal Canal/surgery* ; Quality of Life ; Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of transanal drainage tube (TDT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leak following anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies published from inception to October 2022 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. The primary outcomes included total incidence of anastomotic leak, grade B and C anastomotic leak rates, reoperation rate, anastomotic bleeding rate, and overall complication rate. Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 1115 patients (559 patients in the TDT group and 556 in the non-TDT group) were included. Meta-analysis showed that the total incidences of anastomotic leak and of grade B anastomotic leak were 5.5% (31/559) and 4.5% (25/559), respectively, in the TDT group and 7.9% (44/556) and 3.8% (21/556), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.120, P=0.560, respectively). Compared with the non-TDT group, the TDT group had a lower incidence of grade C anastomotic leak (1.6% [7/559] vs. 4.5% [25/556]) and reoperation rate (0.9% [5/559] vs. 4.3% [24/556]), but a higher incidence of anastomotic bleeding (8.2% [23/279] vs. 3.6% [10/276]). These differences were statistically significant (P=0.003, P=0.001, P=0.030, respectively). The overall complication rate was 26.5%(74/279) in the TDT group and 27.2% (75/276) in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.860). Conclusions: TDT did not significantly reduce the total incidence of anastomotic leak but may have potential clinical benefits in preventing grade C anastomotic leak. Notably, placement of TDT may increase the anastomotic bleeding rate.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Rectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Drainage ; Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Reoperation/adverse effects* ; Hemorrhage ; Retrospective Studies